Preference disaggregation method for value-based multi-decision sorting problems with a real-world application in nanotechnology

We consider a problem of multi-decision sorting subject to multiple criteria. In the newly formulated

decision problem, besides performances on multiple criteria, alternatives get evaluations on multiple

interrelated decision attributes involving preference-ordered classes. We propose a dedicated method

for dealing with such a problem, incorporating a threshold-based value-driven sorting procedure.

The Decision Maker (DM) is expected to holistically evaluate a subset of reference alternatives by

indicating the quality or risk level on a pre-defined scale of each decision attribute. Based on these

evaluations, we construct a set of interrelated preference models, one for each decision attribute,

compatible with intra- and inter-decision constraints imposed by such indirect preference information.

We also formulate a new way of dealing with potentially non-monotonic criteria by discovering local

monotonicity changes in different performance scale regions. The marginal value functions for criteria

with unknown monotonicity are represented as a sum of two value functions assuming opposing

preference directions, one non-decreasing and the other non-increasing. This permits to obtain an

aggregated marginal value function with an arbitrary non-monotonic shape. The practical usefulness

of the approach is demonstrated on a case study concerning risk management related to handling (i.e.,

production, use, manipulation, and processing) nanomaterials in different conditions. We analyze the

expert judgments and discuss the inferred preference models, which can be applied to support health

and safety managers in reducing the possible risk associated with the respective exposure scenario.