Published October 5, 2022 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Reinforcement in the banded darter Etheostoma zonale: the effect of sex and sympatry on preferences

  • 1. University of Maryland, Baltimore County

Description

Reinforcement occurs when selection against hybrid offspring strengthens behavioral isolation between parental species and may be an important factor in speciation. Theoretical models and experimental evidence indicate that both female and male preferences can be strengthened upon secondary contact via reinforcement. However, the question remains whether this process is more likely to affect the preferences of one sex or the other. Males of polygynous species are often predicted to exhibit weaker preferences than females, potentially limiting the ability for reinforcement to shape male preferences. Yet, in darters (Percidae: Etheostoma), male preference for conspecific mates appears to arise before female preferences during the early stages of allopatric speciation, and research suggests that male, but not female, preferences become reinforced upon secondary contact. In the current study, we aimed to determine whether the geographically widespread darter species Etheostoma zonale exhibits a signature of reinforcement, by comparing the strength of preference for conspecific mates between populations that are sympatric and allopatric with respect to a close congener, E. barrenense. We examined the strength of preference for conspecifics for males and females separately to determine if the preferences of one or both sexes have been strengthened by reinforcement. Our results show that both sexes of E. zonale from sympatric populations exhibit stronger conspecific preferences than E. zonale from allopatric populations, but that female preferences appear to be more strongly reinforced than male preferences. Results therefore suggest that reinforcement of female preferences may promote behavioral isolation upon secondary contact, even in a genus that is characterized by pervasive male mate choice.

Notes

Data from the East Fork population for females (SOP) and for East Fork popilation artificial stream assays (I) are from Williams & Mendelson (2010) and data from the East Fork population for males (SOP) is from Roberts & Mendelson (2017).

Funding provided by: Animal Behavior Society
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009702
Award Number: Student Research Grant

Funding provided by: Washington Biologists Field Club
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Files

Rein_data.csv

Files (28.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:3247ece4d884c65336b428327c527a0f
15.2 kB Download
md5:7a72411a52b2ac3746ffae5edc69c858
9.0 kB Preview Download
md5:fb2b09167416e6ba45187f7d3c690adc
2.0 kB Preview Download
md5:73c0faa74bfc5e92ac2038b4edce0224
1.3 kB Preview Download
md5:d64e0b04cf23f57bbbf847696f0c420d
1.4 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works