Published December 30, 2020 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Echinoderes sp. Dujardinii Claparede 1863

  • 1. Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, DK- 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • 2. Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20560, USA.
  • 3. Department of Biological Science, College of Natural and Life Sciences, Daegu University, Gyeongsan 38453, Korea.
  • 4. Crescent International School, Bario, Govindpur, Dhanbad 828109, Jharkhand, India.
  • 5. Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Department of Aquaculture, 32260 Isparta, Turkey.
  • 6. Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, DK- 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • 7. Silifke Vocational School Aquaculture Program, Mersin University, 33940 Mersin, Turkey. Faculty of Arts and Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819 - 0395, Japan.
  • 8. Faculty of Arts and Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819 - 0395, Japan.

Description

Echinoderes sp.

Fig. 25; Table 19

Echinoderes cf. ehlersi – Higgins & Rao 1979: 79–83 (specimens USNM-55393, USNM-55396, USNM-55398 to 55400).

Material examined

INDIA • 1 ♀, 4 ♂♂; Andaman Islands, Havelock Island, East Point; 11°54′ N, 093°03′ E; <1 m b.s.l.; 5 Apr. 1974; G.C. Rao leg.; intertidal black mud with macroalgae; USNM-55393, 55396, and 55398 to 55400. Specimens mounted for LM on Cobb slide in Hoyer’s medium.

The specimens were originally reported as Echinoderes cf. ehlersi (Higgins & Rao 1979). See Table 1 for an overview.

Description

The five specimens were collected together with another five specimens that all together were reported as Echinoderes cf. ehlersi by Higgins & Rao (1979). However, our examinations suggested that the latter five specimens represent a new species. The five specimens, addressed in the following, differ from E. chandrasekharai Sørensen & Chatterjee sp. nov. and as E. ehlersi in some significant points, but since the specimens' condition (e.g., the disability to observe sensory spots consistently) did not provide sufficient information for a complete description and specimens for SEM were not available, we will for now only provide a short description of the observed characters without providing a formal species description.

The examined specimens resemble species like E. kozloffi, E. pacificus and E. sublicarum in general trunk appearance (Fig. 25A) and dimensions (see Table 19). The distribution of glandular cell outlets type 1 (Fig. 25 B–G) is similar to the distribution in E. pacificus also (see Table 8), and so is the distribution of those sensory spots that could be observed. However, the presence or absence of sensory spots could not be confirmed in the following positions: sublateral segment 1, middorsal segment 2, midlateral segment 4 and segment 9. The spine/tube pattern and the approximate dimensions are similar with those of E. kozloffi, i.e., the middorsal spine on segment 8 reaches to a point around the midline of segment 9 (Fig. 25D, F), but never onto segment 10. Glandular cell outlets type 2 are present in midlateral positions, but only on segment 8 (Fig. 25F). Female papillae are present in ventromedial positions on segments 7 (more lateral) and 8 (more medial) (Fig. 25E). The substructures of the papillae on segment 7 are crescentic with a small protuberance in the curved parts of the structures, whereas the substructures on segment 8 form narrow tubes (Fig. 25E). Tergal extensions of terminal segment and shape of lateral terminal spines resemble those in E. kozloffi (Fig. 25G).

Notes

Published as part of Sørensen, Martin V., Goetz, Freya E., Herranz, María, Chang, Cheon Young, Chatterjee, Tapas, Durucan, Furkan, Neves, Ricardo C., Yildiz, N. Özlem, Norenburg, Jon & Yamasaki, Hiroshi, 2020, Description, redescription and revision of sixteen putatively closely related species of Echinoderes (Kinorhyncha: Cyclorhagida), with the proposition of a new species group - the Echinoderes dujardinii group, pp. 1-101 in European Journal of Taxonomy 730 on pages 73-75, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.730.1197, http://zenodo.org/record/4418973

Files

Files (3.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:40af300bddaa22d3091df8facde1569c
3.1 kB Download

System files (31.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:67e312834ba3c96c601c348981c8d041
31.5 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Higgins R. P. & Rao G. C. 1979. Kinorhynchs from the Andaman Islands. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 67: 75 - 85. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1096 - 3642.1979. tb 01106. x