Published December 22, 2020 | Version v1
Dataset Open

The demographic contributions of connectivity versus local dynamics to population growth of an endangered bird

  • 1. United States Geological Survey
  • 2. University of Florida

Description

1. Conservation and management increasingly focus on connectivity, because connectivity driven by variation in immigration rates across landscapes is thought to be crucial for maintaining local population and metapopulation persistence. Yet, efforts to quantify the relative role of immigration on population growth across the entire range of species and over time have been lacking.

2. We assessed whether immigration limited local and range-wide population growth of the endangered snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis) in Florida, USA, over 18 years using multi-state, reverse-time modeling that accounts for imperfect detection of individuals and unobservable states. Demographic contributions of immigration varied depending on the dynamics and geographic position of the local populations, were scale-dependent, and changed over time.

3. By comparing the relative contributions of immigration versus local demography for periods of significant change in local abundance, we found empirical evidence for a disproportionately large role of immigration in facilitating population growth of a centrally-located population—a connectivity 'hub'. The importance of connectivity changed depending of the spatial scale considered, such that immigration was more important driver of population growth at small versus large spatial scales. Furthermore, the contribution of immigration was much greater during time periods when local population size was small, emphasizing abundance-dependent rescue effects.

4. Our findings suggest that efforts aimed at improving local breeding habitat will likely be most effective at increasing snail kite population growth. More broadly, our results provide much needed information on the role of connectivity for population growth, suggesting that connectivity conservation may have the greatest benefits when efforts focus on centrally located habitat patches and small populations. Furthermore, our results highlight that connectivity is highly dynamic over time and that interpreting the effects of connectivity at local scales may not transfer to region-wide dynamics.

Notes

This is a multi-state reverse-time robust band-resight datset for snail kites covering their entire breeding range in Florida from 2015-1997. "0" = non-detected,  "S" = snail kites resighted as adults (>1 year old) in the southern sub-population (south of Lake Okeechobee),  "R" = snail kites captured and banded as young (<1 year old) in the southern sub-population (south of Lake Okeechobee), "K" = snail kites resighted as adults (>1 year old) in Lake Okeechobee,  "J" = snail kites captured and banded as young (<1 year old) in Lake Okeechobee, "N" = snail kites resighted as adults (>1 year old) in the northern sub-population (north of Lake Okeechobee),  "M" = snail kites captured and banded as young (<1 year old) in the northern sub-population (north of Lake Okeechobee). 

All years have 6 repeat survey efforts, except 2002 and 2003, which have 5 and 4, respectively. 

To assess the role of immigration in maintaining local population growth, we compared the relative contribution of total immigration (adult and juvenile) versus the combined contributions of local adult survival (and fidelity) and local juvenile recruitment for each of the three local populations (northern region, southern region, and Lake Okeechobee).  We tested whether contribution parameters varied over time using AIC to compare the relative fit of a model with time-invariant contribution parameters to that of a model that allowed contributions to vary among years. All models were implemented using Program MARK 8.1 (White & Burnham, 1999), implemented using the R-package, RMark (Laake, 2013).

Funding provided by: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006752
Award Number:

Funding provided by: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006596
Award Number:

Funding provided by: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000202
Award Number:

Funding provided by: St. John's River Water Management District*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: U.S. Geological Survey
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000203
Award Number:

Funding provided by: St. John's River Water Management District
Crossref Funder Registry ID:

Files

revRobust_NKS2015to1997.csv

Files (421.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:43d62331d7c3b3ff668303b7610497fc
421.4 kB Preview Download