Published November 6, 2020 | Version v1
Book chapter Open

Comprovisação e Interação Leigo-Músico nas Práticas Criativas Cognitivo-Ecológicas: The Maxwell Demon

  • 1. USP
  • 2. NAP/UFAC

Description

We discuss the contributions of a ubimus-oriented artistic project - Maxwell's Demon (The Maxwell Demon) - highlighting the specific challenges of lay-musician interaction. Using the MoMuPlat environment, we implemented the TMD sound-synthesis tool for portable and fixed devices. Five musicians and three lay people of both sexes participated in the study, targeting improvisational group activities based on simple verbal instructions. Through interviews with participants, on-site observations and analysis of audio and video recordings, we obtained results that indicate advantages and limitations of the knowledge-transfer strategies applied during the activities. The items covered include, on the one hand, problems in the activity-preparation stage; the generation of new materials was encouraged but the reuse of sound resources was low. On the other hand, the participants' body movements served to expand their creative engagement; the layman-musician interaction was effective in establishing a common mechanism for participants with and without specific training. Overall, these results indicate that it is necessary to develop design strategies focused on making the knowledge explicit or supporting the transfer of tacit knowledge necessary to achieve creative group results.

Files

13 Aliel Maxwell Demon.pdf

Files (436.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4f70e12446b91620c69545f8de694a0e
436.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Aliel, L. (2017). Ensaios sobre comprovisações em ecologia sonora: Perspectivas práticas e teóricas. Mestrado em Música São Paulo, SP: Universidade de São Paulo.
  • Aliel, L., Keller, D. & Costa, R. (2018). The Maxwell Demon: a Proposal for Modeling in Ecological Synthesis in Art Practices. Música Hodie 18 (1), 103--116. (Doi: 10.5216/mh.v18i1.53575.)
  • Aliel, L., Keller, D., Costa, R. . Comprovisação Abordagens Desde a Heurística Estética em Ecocomposição. In: SBCM - XV Simpósio Brasileiro de Computação Musical, 2015, Campinas/SP. SBCM - XV Simpósio Brasileiro de Computação Musical, 2015.
  • Barreiro, D. L. & Keller, D. (2010). Composição com modelos sonoros: Fundamentos e aplicações eletroacústicas. In D. Keller & R. Budasz (eds.), Musical creation and technologies: Interdisciplinary theory and practice (pp. 97-126). Goiânia, GO: Editora ANPPOM. http://www.anppom.com.br/editora/
  • Baudrillard, J , 1994 Simulacra and Simulation (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI)
  • Bhagwati, S. (2013). Towards interactive onscreen notations for comprovisation in large ensembles. In Sound & Score: Essays on Sound, Score and Notation (pp. 143-177). Brussels: Leuven University Press.
  • Brown, A. R., Stewart, D., Hansen, A. & Stewart, A. (2014). Making meaningful musical experiences accessible using the iPad. In D. Keller, V. Lazzarini & M. S. Pimenta (eds.), Ubiquitous Music (pp. 65-81). Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer International Publishing. (ISBN: 978-3-319-11151-3.)
  • Burtner, M., Kemper, S. & Topper, D. (2012). Network Socio-Synthesis and Emergence in NOMADS. Organised Sound 17 (1), 45–55. (Doi: 10.1017/S1355771811000501.)
  • Cardew, C. A Scratch Orchestra: Draft Constitution. The Musical Times 110 (1516), 617-619. 125th Anniversary Issue. 1969.
  • Curran, A. and Teitelbaum, R. Musica Elettronica Viva. For MEV, program notes. New York: The Knitting Factory. http://www.alvincurran.com/writings/mev.html. 1989.
  • Dudas, R. Comprovisation: The Various Facets of Composed Improvisation within Interactive Performance Systems, Leonardo Music Journal 20 p. 29-31. 2010.
  • Ferreira, E., Keller, D. & Lima, M. H. (2016). Sonic sketches in ubiquitous music: Educational perspectives (Esboços sonoros em música ubíqua: Perspectivas educacionais). Sonic Ideas 8 (15), 12. http://www.sonicideas.org/mag.php?vol=8&num=15&secc=nuevasacademias
  • Fujak, J. Comprovisación – Notas para la discusión sobre la validez delconcepto, Oro Molido No. 33, Madrid, Spain. 2011.
  • Hannan, M Interrogating Comprovisation as Practice-led Research, in Speculation and Innovation: applying practice led research in the creative industries, Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology,
  • Iglesia. D. The Mobility is the Message: the Development and Uses of Mob Mu plat. In: PdCon16.NYC. 2016. http://www.danieliglesia.com/mobmuplat/Iglesi aMobMuPlatPaper.pdf
  • Keller, D. (2000). Compositional processes from an ecological perspective. Leonardo Music Journal 10 , 55-60. (Doi: 10.1162/096112100570459.)
  • Keller, D. (2014). Characterizing resources in ubimus research: Volatility and rivalry. In Proceedings of the V Workshop in Ubiquitous Music (V UbiMus) . Vitória, ES: Ubiquitous Music Group. Retrieved from http://compmus.ime.usp.br/ubimus2014/.
  • Keller, D. (2018). Challenges for a second decade of ubimus research: Knowledge transfer in ubimus activities. Música Hodie 18 (1), 148--165. (Doi: 10.5216/mh.v18i1.53578.) Retrieved from https://www.revistas.ufg.br/musica/article/download/53578/25698.
  • Keller, D., Barreiro, D. L., Queiroz, M. & Pimenta, M. S. (2010). Anchoring in ubiquitous musical activities. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC 2010) (pp. 319-326). Ann Arbor, MI: MPublishing, University of Michigan Library.
  • Keller, D., Capasso, A. & Tinajero, P. (2019). Knowledge transfer in ecologically grounded approaches to ubimus: InMesh 1.0. Journal of New Music Research 48 (4), 397-411. (Doi: 10.1080/09298215.2019.1642361.)
  • Keller, D. & Lazzarini, V. (2017). Ecologically grounded creative practices in ubiquitous music. Organised Sound 22 (1), 61-72. (Doi: 10.1017/S1355771816000340.)
  • Keller, D., Lazzarini, V. & Pimenta, M. S. (2014). Ubiquitous Music, Vol. XXVIII. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing. (ISBN: 978-3-319-11152-0.)
  • Keller, D. & Lima, M. H. (2016). Supporting everyday creativity in ubiquitous music making. In P. Kostagiolas, K. Martzoukou & C. Lavranos (eds.), Trends in Music Information Seeking, Behavior, and Retrieval for Creativity (pp. 78-99). Vancouver, BC: IGI Global Press.
  • Keller, D., Timoney, J., Costalonga, L., Capasso, A., Tinajero, P., Lazzarini, V., Pimenta, M. S., Lima, M. H. & Johann, M. (2014). Ecologically grounded multimodal design: The Palafito 1.0 study. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC 2014) (pp. 1677-1684). Ann Arbor, MI: MPublishing, University of Michigan Library.
  • Lewis, G. E. (2000). Too many notes: computers, complexity and culture in Voyager. Leonardo Music Journal 10 , 33-39. (Doi: 10.1162/096112100570585.)
  • Lima, M. H., Keller, D., Flores, L. V. & Ferreira, E. (2017). Ubiquitous music research: Everyday musical phenomena and their multidisciplinary implications for creativity and education. Journal of Music, Technology and Education 10 (1), 73-92. (Doi: 10.1386/jmte.10.1.73_1.)
  • Lima, M. H., Keller, D., Pimenta, M. S., Lazzarini, V. & Miletto, E. M. (2012). Creativity-centred design for ubiquitous musical activities: Two case studies. Journal of Music, Technology and Education 5 (2), 195-222. (Doi: 10.1386/jmte.5.2.195_1.)
  • Mannis, J. A. (2014). Processos cognitivos de percepção, análise e síntese atuando no processo criativo: Mímesis de mímesis. In Anais do Encontro Nacional de Composição Musical de Londrina (EnCom 2014) .
  • Messina, M., Aliel, L. Ubiquitous Music, Gelassenheit and the Metaphysics of Presence: Hijacking the Live Score Piece Ntrallazzu 4. In: 4th International Symposium on Computer Music Multidisciplinary Research (CMMR), 2019, Marselha. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on CMMR, 2019. v. v.1. p. 685-95.
  • Puckette, M. Pure Data. Proceedings, International Computer Music Conference. (pp. 269-272.) San Francisco: International Computer Music Association. 1996.
  • Sibertin-Blanc, C., Thérond, O. and Monteil, C., Mazzega, P.: Formal modeling of social- ecological systems. In: European Social Simulation Association Conference, Cemagref 2011.
  • Trueman, D. (2007). Why a laptop orchestra?. Organised Sound 12 (2), 171-179. (Doi: 10.1017/S135577180700180X.)