Mining and distribution of flint by the tribes of Cucuteni-Trypillian community
Description
Having quite a massive and diverse source of raw materials tribes of Cucuteni-Trypillian community begin its active exploitation and utilization already from the early stages of their existence and continue throughout all their following history. Flint industry of Cucuteni-Trypillian community centers around two main scenarios: extraction – processing – distribution and/or extraction – distribution – processing of flint materials.
There were a few completely different ways of flint extraction. First one (opened) was the simplest, did not require special skills and hard labor, being a simple collection of stones directly on the surface of the ground or in basseting areas (such as screes). Second one (closed) was the most complicated, requiring special tools, skills, hard labor and correspondingly more complicated organization of the community. This way implies flint extraction deep in its deposits that are often invisible from the surface crust. But it proved its value: flint miners obtained excellent high-quality materials for further processing, providing mineral wealth not only for their own communities, but also for close and remote related as well as non-Trypillian communities.
We distinguished ‘close’ and ‘remote’ radiuses of obtained flint materials distribution. First term describes self-sustainment of separate communities with raw materials and products of its` processing that were necessary for functioning of these collectives. Second term refers to directed massive production (extraction, processing) not only for internal needs, but mainly for exportation of obtained raw materials or finished wares, made of these materials.
Also a question was raised regarding massive supply of regions that had no qualitative mineral wealth (Bug and Dnipro regions, Bug–Dnieper interfluve area) with flint from the proximate microregion in the Velyka Vys’ basin in contradiction to widespread belief about a more remote ‘donator’ – Volhyn’ territory. Presence in Cucuteni-Trypillian community of flint-mining shafts, functioning of which required special skills and hard labor, specialized flint-processing workshops, transportation of raw materials and products of cleavage to remote territories became a basis for defining in this community a collective occupation, associated with flint mining and processing. Consequently, questions connected with this occupation, taking into account its` versatility, complexity and scale should be among the basic ones in the complex study of trypillian economics.
Notes
Files
0011VA-2018_Pichkur.pdf
Files
(2.3 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:dfabe1a9f3c93a235bdc517fa5b05c11
|
2.3 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is derived from
- Journal article: http://vitaantiqua.org.ua/en/archives/1640 (URL)
- Is part of
- 2522-9419 (ISSN)
- 2519-4542 (ISSN)
- 10.37098/2519-4542-2018-1-10 (DOI)
- http://vitaantiqua.org.ua/en/archives/8650 (URL)
References
- Bibikov, S.N. (1965). Drevniye kremnevyye vyrabotki na gore Beloy v rayone Kamenets-Podolska. Tezy dopovideiPodilskoiistoryko-kraieznavchoikonferentsii. Khmelnytskyi, 62-64.
- Bibikov, S.N. (1966). Drevniye kremnevyye vyrabotki v Srednem Podnestrovye. Sbornik Narodoveho Muzea v Praze, 20, № 1/2: 3-6.
- Budziszewski, J., (1995). Flint Materials from Cemeteries of the Sofievka Type. Baltic-Pontic Studies, 3: 148-189.
- Chernysh, E.K. (1967). Tripolskiye masterskiye po obrabotke kremnya. Kratkiye soobshcheniya Instituta arkheologii AN SSSR, 111: 60-66.
- Husiev, S.O. (2005). Zv'iazky trypilskykh plemen Serednoho Pobuzhzhia (za materialamy krem'ianoi industrii). Naukovi pratsi Kam'ianets-Podilskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Istorychni nauky, T.14. Kam'ianets-Podilskyi, 59-66.
- Kadrow, S. (2016). Nachalo eneolita na severnykh okrainakh pozdnikh dunayskikh kultur na rubezhe V i IV tysyacheletiy do n.e. STRАTUM Plus, №2: 17-37.
- Konoplia, V. (2006). Skarb krem'ianykh vyrobiv z Ivano-Frankivska. Materialy i doslidzhennia z arkheolohii Prykarpattia i Volyni, Vyp. 10: 201-208.
- Nuzhnyi, D.Yu., Shydlovskyi, P.S. (2009). Industrialna variabelnist hospodarskykh ob'iektiv pershoho zhytla Mezhyritskoho verkhnopaleolitychnoho poselennia. Arkheologicheskiyalmanakh, №20: 203-218.
- Petrun', V.F. (1998). Nyzhnotortonski valuychasti kremenevi porody Podnistrov'ia yak spetsializovana artefaktna syrovyna peredskifskoho chasu. Arkheolohiia, № 3: 91-102.
- Petrun', V.F. (2004). Vykorystannia mineralnoi syrovyny naselenniam trypilskoi kultury. V: Videiko, M.Yu. (red.). Entsyklopediia trypilskoi tsyvilizatsii, T. 1. Kyiv, 199-218.
- Pichkur, Ye.V. (2015). Kremenevi skarby Trypilskoi kultury. Arkheolohiia idavnia istoriia Ukrainy, 3(16): 65-76.
- Pichkur, Ye.V. (2017). Indikatory «importov» v tripolskoy kulture (po materialam «kladov» kremnevykh plastin). VITA ANTIQUA, 9: 206-222.
- Pichkur, Ye.V., Shydlovskyi, P.S. (2003). Kompleks kremeneobrobky na poselenni Pekari II. Trypilski poselennia- hihanty (Materialy mizhnarodnoinaukovoikonferentsii). Kyiv: Korvin Press, 121-129.
- Pichkur, Ye.V., Shydlovskyi, P.S. (2005). Do pytannia pro rol mistsevoho ta importnoho (volynskoho) kremeniu v kremeneobrobtsi trypilskykh plemen Buho-Dniprovskoho mezhyrichchia. V: Skakun N.N. i dr. Bodaki-2005. Arkheologicheskiye issledovaniya tripolskogo poseleniya Bodaki v 2005. Kiev-SPb: Korvin Press. 109-123.
- Popova, T.A. (2003). Mnogosloynoye poseleniye Polivanov Yar. K evolyutsii tripolskoy kultury v Srednem Podnestrovye. SPb.: Kunstkamera.
- Ryzhov, S.M. (2004). Krem'iani vykhody Kanivskoho Prydniprov'ia. Kam'iana doba Ukrainy, Vyp. 5: 112-119.
- Shydlovskyi, P.S. (2005). Vplyv fizychnoho otochennia na formuvannia materialnoi kultury piznopaleolitychnoho naselennia Serednoho Podniprov'ia. Problemy arkheolohii Serednoho Podniprov'ia: Do 15-richchia zasnuvannia Fastivskoho derzhavnoho kraieznavchoho muzeiu. Kyiv-Fastiv: FDKM, 31-39.
- Shydlovskyi, P.S., Pichkur, Ye.V., Chernovol, D.K. (2004). Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia poblyzu s. Apolianka na Umanshchyni. Arkheolohichni vidkryttia v Ukraini 2002-2003 rr., Vyp. 6: 361-365.
- Skakun, N.N. (2005). Bodaki - odin iz tsentrov kremneobrabatyvayushchego proizvodstva na Volyni. V: Skakun N.N. i dr. Bodaki-2005. Arkheologicheskiye issledovaniya tripolskogo poseleniya Bodaki v 2005. Kiev- SPb: Korvin Press, 64-80.
- Skakun, N.N. (2006). Bodaki - krupneyshiy tripolskiy tsentr po obrabotke kremnya v vostochnoy Evrope. Proizvodstvennyye tsentry: istochniki, «dorogi», areal rasprostraneniya: Mat-ly tematicheskoy nauch. konf. SPb, 41-44.
- Tsvek, O.V. (2005). Do pytannia vydilennia vyrobnychykh kultiv u naselennia trypilskoi spilnoty. Kam'iana doba Ukrainy, Vyp. 7: 160-167.
- Tsvek, E.V. (2012). K voprosu ob industrii kremnya u naseleniya tripolskoy obshchnosti. STRАTUM Plus, №2: 211-225.
- Tsvek, E.V., Movchan, I.I. (1997). Novyy proizvodstvennyy kompleks tripolskoy kultury po dobyche i obrabotke kremnya. Razvitiye kultury vkamennom veke. Tez. dokl. mezhdunarod. konf. SPb, 142-144.
- Vasylenko, B.A. (1989). Obrobka i vydobuvannia kremeniu na pravoberezhzhi Podnistrov'ia v eneoliti. Problemy istorii ta arkheolohii davnoho naselennia Ukrainskoi RSR. Kyiv, 38-39.
- Videiko, M.Yu. (2004). Ekonomika trypilskoi kultury. Vydobutok ta obrobka kremeniu. V: Videiko, M.Yu. (eds.). Entsyklopediia trypilskoi tsyvilizatsii, T. 1. Kyiv, 261-273.
- Zaliznyak, L.L., Stepanchuk, V.M., Kukharchuk, Yu.V., Tovkailo, M.T., Matviishyna, Zh.M., Manko, V.O., Vietrov, D.O., Belenko, M.M., Ozerov, P.I., Khoptynets, I.M., Nezdolii, O.I., Doroshkevych, S.P., Sorokun, A.A., Shevchenko, T.O. (2013). Naidavnishe mynule Novomyrhorodshchyny. Kam'iana doba Ukrainy, Vyp. 15. Kyiv: Shliakh.