Published August 25, 2020 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Growing in the city: urban evolutionary ecology of avian growth rates.

  • 1. University of Warsaw
  • 2. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences

Description

Rapid environmental change driven by urbanisation offers a unique insight into the adaptive potential of wildlife as it can induce distinct selective pressures on urban dwelling organisms. Despite mounting evidence for urban-driven phenotypic differentiation across taxa, knowledge of the impact of urbanisation on vertebrate developmental rates and subsequent survival is very limited. Importantly, the role of selection on urban-driven body mass divergence in juvenile organisms remains poorly understood. We studied nestling development in a gradient of urbanisation set in Warsaw, Poland, in two nestbox breeding passerine species: great tits (Parus major) and blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus). Each nestbox in the study system was assessed for surrounding percentage of Impervious Surface Area (ISA). Within these nestboxes, weight measurements of individual nestlings were collected during three breeding seasons and at regular intervals after hatching. Although asymptotic mass and growth rate were not directly affected by ISA in a subset of frequently measured nestlings, the age of fastest growth (inflection point) was delayed in blue tit nests surrounded by greater ISA. Across the entire dataset, nestling body mass was negatively affected by increasing ISA at days 5 and 10 after hatching for great tits, and at days 10 and 15 for blue tits, respectively. Concomitantly, offspring survival at days 5 and 10 decreased with increasing ISA for both species. An analysis of selection differentials performed for two contrasting levels of imperviousness (low and high ISA) revealed a significant positive association between mass at day 2 and survival at fledging. Importantly, the strength of selection for heavier nestlings at hatching was greater for great tits in the more transformed, high ISA environment. This study confirms the considerable impact of imperviousness -a proxy for urbanisation level- on offspring development, body mass and survival, and highlights increased selection on avian birth weight in a high ISA environment.

Notes

Data used for this publication include two main files:

1) GrowthParam2016_EvoApp2019_FlexParamCurve: contains the data used to test the effect of ISA on great tits and blue tits growth curve parameters. Statistical methods are described in detail in Section 2.6.1.

2) Survival_EvoApp2016_2017_2018: contains the data used to test the effect of ISA on great tit and blue tit nestling body mass (Section 2.6.2), survival (Section 2.6.3), and selection differentials (Section 2.6.4). 

Additional files were used to generate figures in R (ggplot):

3) CurvePlot_EvoApp_Corsini2020: data used to generate Figure 2.

4) selection_differential_coefficients_BT and selection_differential_coefficients_GT: combined data used to generate Figure 3.

 

Legend and specific information on each dataset are listed below:

 

dataset: GrowthParam2016_EvoApp2019_FlexParamCurve:
Station ID climatic station, Waw = within Warsaw city borders, Leg = outside Warsaw city borders (PAL and KPN)
NestboxID nestbox ID
Ring Ring number
DateGr Date expressed as dd/mm/yyyy
JDateGr Julian date (1st of April as 1)
Asym Asymptotic mass (in g)
k growth rate
Infl Inflaction point (in days)
M shape of the curve
Species GT= great tit, BT= blue tit
Sex F= female, M= male
HatN total number of hatched nestlings
Fledged 1= fledged, 0 = not fledged
CurveTest included for growth curve analyses, 1= yes, 0= no
EDM earliest date of measurement (at which age - expressed in days - a nestling was measured for the first time)
LayD when the first egg was laid (Julian date, 1st of April = 1)
HatDJ when the first chick hatched in a brood (Julian date, 1st of April = 1)
MeanT15 Mean temperature (in C) across the 15 or 16 days of each nestling growth
ISA impervious surface area (expressed as a percentage)
CS clutch size 
D2 body mass (in g) at day 2 (hatching date =  day 1)
D10 body mass (in g) at day 10 (hatching date =  day 1)
D15 body mass (in g) at day 15 (hatching date =  day 1)
D16 body mass (in g) at day 16 (hatching date =  day 1)

Note: only one year of data (2016 - high resoluted measurements)

 

dataset: Survival_EvoApp2016_2017_2018:

Sheet: Nestlings_EvoApp2019

Year 2016, 2017, 2018  
Site Study site abbreviation (8 sites) POL (urban park), KPN (National park - forest), UNI (Office area), MUR (Residential area I ), OLO (Residential area II), CMZ (Urban woodland I), LOL (Urban woodland II), PAL (Suburban village)
Species BT: blue tit, GT: great tit  
Sex_ch M: male, F: female nestling sex
LayD Laying date (1st of April as 1) comment: Only first broods considered
HatD Hatching date (1st of April as 1)  
ChickID NestboxID_Ring unique id per single nestling
CS Clutch size (Number of eggs)  
d2 nestling mass at day 2 (in g) comment: hatching date taken as Day 1
d5 nestling mass at day 5 (in g) comment: hatching date taken as Day 1
d10 nestling mass at day 10 (in g) comment: hatching date taken as Day 1
d15 Nestling mass at day 15 (in g) comment: chicks were ringed at Day 15
     
sur2 1: survived, 0: not survived nestling survived between Day 0 and Day 2 
sur5 1: survived, 0: not survived nestling survived between Day 2 and Day 5
sur10 1: survived, 0: not survived nestling survived between Day 5 and Day 10
sur15 1: survived, 0: not survived nestling survived between Day 10 and Day 15
Fledged 1: fledged; 0:not fledged to infer fledging success, nests were checked 25 days after hatching (D25). Hatching date taken as D1. Nestlings survived between Day 15 and Fledging (day 25)
ISA Impervious surface in % Comment: built up area in % (buldings, paved roads, etc), calculated on 100m radius at the nestbox level. TIFF file obtained from Copernicus.
Note: missing data = NA  
     
sur2old 1: survived, 0: not survived nestling survived until Day 2 
sur5old 1: survived, 0: not survived nestling survived until Day 5
sur10old 1: survived, 0: not survived nestling survived until Day 10
sur15old 1: survived, 0: not survived nestling survived until Day 15
Fledgedold 1: fledged; 0:not fledged to infer fledging success, nests were checked 25 days after hatching (D25). Hatching date taken as D1.
broodID unique brood ID unique brood ID created specifying Year_NestboxID

Sheet: Broods_EvoApp2019

Year 2016, 2017, 2018  
Site Study site abbreviation (8 sites) POL (urban park), KPN (National park - forest), UNI (Office area), MUR (Residential area I ), OLO (Residential area II), CMZ (Urban woodland I), LOL (Urban woodland II), PAL (Suburban village)
Species BT: blue tit, GT: great tit  
CS Clutch size (Number of eggs)  
HatD Hatching date (1st of April as 1)  
HatN Total number of hatched nestlings  
     
Nr_D2 Number of alive nestlings at day 2  
Nr_D5 number of alive nestlings at day 5  
Nr_D10 number of alive nestlings at day 10  
Nr_D15 number of alive nestlings at day 15  
Nr_Fledged total number of fledged chicks  
ISA Impervious surface in % Comment: built up area in % (buldings, paved roads, etc), calculated on 100m radius at the nestbox level. TIFF file obtained from Copernicus.
BroodID_unique unique brood ID unique brood ID created specifying  NestboxID, Species and Year

Note: empty cells are missing data

Daily temperature (in C) (from 2 meteorological stations: Warsaw and Legionowo. Legionowo data used for KPN and PAL).

T1_2 averaged daily temp between day 1 and day 2 (included) for body mass and survival at day 2 
T2_5 averaged daily temp between day 2 and day 5 (included) for body mass and survival at day 5
T5_10 averaged daily temp between day 5 and day 10 (included) for body mass and survival at day 10
T10_15 averaged daily temp between day 10 and day 15 (included) for body mass and survival at day 15
T15_25 averaged daily temp between day 15 and day 25 (included) for survival at fledging
T1_25 averaged daily temp between day 1 and day 25 (included) for selection analyses

Station: Climatic station (Waw = within Warsaw city borders, Leg = outside Warsaw city borders, KPN and PAL)

 

dataset: CurvePlot_EvoApp_Corsini2020

Sheet: Data

NestboxID Nestbox id.
Species GT= great tit, BT = blue tit.
Day brood age expressed in days (hatching date = day 1).
BrMass Mass average at the brood level (in g).
ISA Impervious Surface Area (in %).
newISAcat ISA category (as low or high).

Note: the plot shows growth inferred at the brood level for 1 year of data (2016) and across 3 study sites (POL, CMZ and KPN).

Funding provided by: Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004281
Award Number: 2017/25/N/NZ8/02852

Funding provided by: Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004281
Award Number: 2014/14/E/NZ8/00386

Funding provided by: Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004281
Award Number: 2016/21/B/NZ8/03082

Funding provided by: Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004281
Award Number: 2015/19/P/NZ8/02992

Files

Files (553.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:8d73d350ced6f16176bc546c7898f1b7
20.8 kB Download
md5:f7daf462d386dc612b9c3bbf72e4154d
54.6 kB Download
md5:c5879e61eb514b7d8c58515e988d8846
9.0 kB Download
md5:4ca5fecd08bcf464ae62a55025840059
8.6 kB Download
md5:b0640e7b7310e29d32652091bb23922d
460.4 kB Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
10.1111/eva.13081 (DOI)