Supplementary material 1 from: Dickey JWE, Cuthbert RN, South J, Britton JR, Caffrey J, Chang X, Crane K, Coughlan NE, Fadaei E, Farnsworth KD, Ismar-Rebitz SMH, Joyce PWS, Julius M, Laverty C, Lucy FE, MacIsaac HJ, McCard M, McGlade CLO, Reid N, Ricciardi A, Wasserman RJ, Weyl OLF, Dick JTA (2020) On the RIP: using Relative Impact Potential to assess the ecological impacts of invasive alien species. NeoBiota 55: 27-60. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.55.49547

Published April 11, 2020 | Version v1

Dataset Open

1. Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
2. South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Makhanda, South Africa|Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
3. Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, United Kingdom
4. INVAS Biosecurity, Dublin, Ireland
5. Yunnan University, Kunming, China
6. Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel, Kiel, Germany
7. Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Denmark
8. Saint Cloud State University, Saint Cloud, United States of America
9. Institute of Technology Sligo, Sligo, Ireland
10. Yunnan University, Kunming, China|University of Windsor, Windsor, Canada
11. McGill University, Montreal, Canada
12. Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Palapye, Botswana|South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Makhanda, South Africa
13. South Africa Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Grahamstown, South Africa
14. Queens University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom

Table S1. Outline of different numerical response proxies available, guidance for their use and the advantages and disadvantages of each

Files

Name	Size	Download all
oo_397268.docx md5:652def9f89a5659ac4c986586d24547b	27.9 kB	Download