Published March 28, 2020
| Version v1
Dataset
Open
Supplementary material 2 from: Chapman AD, Belbin L, Zermoglio PF, Wieczorek J, Morris PJ, Nicholls M, Rees ER, Veiga AK, Thompson A, Saraiva AM, James SA, Gendreau C, Benson A, Schigel D (2020) Developing Standards for Improved Data Quality and for Selecting Fit for Use Biodiversity Data. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 4: e50889. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.4.50889
Authors/Creators
- 1. Australian Biodiversity Information Services, Ballan, Australia
- 2. The Atlas of Living Australia, Carlton, Australia
- 3. VertNet, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- 4. Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, United States of America
- 5. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
- 6. Atlas of Living Australia, Canberra, Australia
- 7. University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- 8. iDigBio, Gainesville, United States of America
- 9. Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Western Australian Herbarium, Kensington, WA, Australia
- 10. Global Biodiversity Information Facility - Secretariat, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
- 11. U.S. Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO, United States of America
Description
Use cases were collected using a number of methods to maximise responses. Lead authors of papers published using data accessed via the Atlas of Living Australia (ALA) were contacted and asked to contribute their research data use cases, and a number of papers describing fitness for use determination were sent to the ALA Data Quality group. Fitness for use and quality check information from these papers were extracted and transferred to the use case library. These are the results of those surveys.
Files
Files
(333.5 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:d8d0b3dde2fce7d440007e56bfd54ad1
|
333.5 kB | Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is supplement to
- Journal article: 10.3897/biss.4.50889 (DOI)