Published November 4, 2026 | Version v1

Invariant-Core Expressive Realization Theory (ICERT): A Formal Framework for Core-Preserving Expression Generation, Cardinality, Structural Diversity and Functional Invariance

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Independent Researcher

Description

This paper specifies the Invariant-Core Expressive Realization Theory (ICERT), a formal framework for investigating how many distinct expressions can represent a specified semantic or functional core while preserving designated properties. Its motivating case contrasts the positive-attitude expression "I like the subject" with the negated negative-attitude expression "I do not dislike the subject." The two forms may be compatible in a given context, but they do not generally express identical commitments.
ICERT separates the specification of an invariant core from candidate generation, admissibility testing, equivalence classification, expression counting, structural-diversity measurement and empirical validation. Its principal counting object is a constrained realization set, whose cardinality is defined relative to a declared grammar, vocabulary, context, feature selection and admissibility policy. The framework distinguishes the number of admissible surface forms from the number of semantic equivalence classes and distinguishes exact core preservation from approximate similarity.
Under explicit assumptions, the paper establishes results concerning equivalence relations, cardinality bounds, monotonicity under nested constraints, finite-state counting, normalized discrepancy scores, entropy bounds, transformation composition and the correctness of finite enumeration algorithms. It also identifies the conditions under which these results do not imply a universal count or guarantee accurate interpretation in unrestricted natural language.
The resulting architecture connects formal semantics, logic, set theory, formal-language theory, computational linguistics, information theory and system-theoretic modelling without treating their distinct notions of equivalence as interchangeable. The paper is a formal theoretical specification and proof dossier rather than a report of completed empirical experiments. A research protocol for implementation, human annotation, metric validation, falsification, reproducibility and subsequent publication is provided.
**Keywords:** semantic invariance; expression realization; constrained enumeration; formal semantics; paraphrase; equivalence relations; finite automata; information theory; functional preservation; ICERT.

Files

INVARIANT_CORE_EXPRESSIVE_REALIZATION_THEORY__ICERT_.pdf

Files (425.8 kB)

Name Size
md5:815fe0eb2e68619877c6a929d0c1c01f
425.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • [1] Sweta Agrawal and Marine Carpuat. Do Text Simplification Systems Preserve Meaning? A Human Evaluation via Reading Comprehension. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 12:432-448, 2024. DOI: 10.1162/tacl_a_00653. Available at: https://aclanthology.org/2024.tacl-1.24/. [2] Jacob Cohen. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1):37-46, 1960. DOI: 10.1177/001316446002000104. [3] John E. Hopcroft, Rajeev Motwani, and Jeffrey D. Ullman. Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. 3rd edition. Pearson/Addison-Wesley, 2006. [4] Klaus Krippendorff. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 4th edition. SAGE Publications, 2018. [5] Remi Mir, Bjarke Felbo, Nick Obradovich, and Iyad Rahwan. Evaluating Style Transfer for Text. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 495-504, 2019. DOI: 10.18653/v1/N19-1049. Available at: https://aclanthology.org/N19-1049/. [6] Sourabrata Mukherjee, Atul Kr. Ojha, John P. McCrae, and Ondrej Dusek. Evaluating Text Style Transfer Evaluation: Are There Any Reliable Metrics? In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 4: Student Research Workshop, pages 418-434, 2025. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-srw.41. Available at: https://aclanthology.org/2025.naacl-srw.41/. [7] Amalie Brogaard Pauli, Isabelle Augenstein, and Ira Assent. Mind the Style Gap: Meta-Evaluation of Style and Attribute Transfer Metrics. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025, pages 21550-21564, 2025. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.1175. Available at: https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-emnlp.1175/. [8] Claude E. Shannon. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3):379-423, 1948. DOI: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x. [9] Afonso Sousa and Henrique Lopes Cardoso. PAM: Paraphrase AMR-Centric Evaluation Metric. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025, pages 17106-17121, 2025. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.879. Available at: https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-acl.879/.