Interdisciplinary Research Approach: The Structural Paradox of Constitutional Oaths and Systemic Perjury in Modern State Architecture

My argument is based on the purely legal and factual structure of the German state system, and this factual situation is unequivocal:

•    The Legal Sanctuary (The Protective Sphere):

Through the mechanisms of state liability (Amtshaftung pursuant to Art. 34 of the Basic Law [GG]), parliamentary immunity, and indemnity (Indemnität pursuant to Art. 46 of the Basic Law [GG]), a statutory framework is established that exempts these actors from private civil and financial liability for damages in the core area of their political conduct.

•    Self-Legislation (The Self-Authored Law):

Since the legislature (the members of parliament) enacts the laws themselves within a parliamentary democracy, these politically acting agents naturally determine the very rules of the game by which they can – or cannot – be held accountable in the event of flawed decisions (exemplified by the abolition of sworn testimonies before investigative committees in the Federal Parliament [Bundestag]).

My critique of this system is not based on speculation, but on a real-existing, systemic legal imbalance (the two-tier liability structure):

While every ordinary citizen (the actual guarantors [die Bürgen]), worker, employee, self-employed individual, or corporate director bears the full civil and criminal consequences – up to personal financial ruin – for culpable errors in their professional lives, a state-sponsored safety net has protected political failure and multi-billion-euro miscalculations across generations.

My criminal complaints and formal petitions for prosecution filed with the Federal Public Prosecutor General (Generalbundesanwalt) Jens Rommel attack precisely these factual circumstances, calling upon him to apply the legal standards for breaches of duty, perjury (Meineid, § 154 StGB), and breach of trust (Treuebruch, § 266) to the specific, individually identified natural persons (personae) without the shield of these parliamentary privileges.

Systemic Matrix Update

Verfahrens-Aktenzeichen: AR 27/26, Ihr Schreiben (Amtsrätin Tiebermann) vom 12.02.2026 (anhängig zu Strafanzeige und Strafantrag „Kollektiver Meineid“; Antrag auf Verfahrensverbindung)

Verfahrens-Aktenzeichen: AR 940/22, Ihr Schreiben (Dr. Claudius Weisensee) vom 11.02.2022 Bundesverfassungsgericht (anhängig zu Strafanzeige und Strafantrag „Kollektiver Meineid“; Antrag auf Verfahrensverbindung)

The principal indictment of Collective Perjury against constitutional organs establishes the foundation for this active legal proceeding, which is predicated upon real criminal complaints and documented collapses within the administrative and financial apparatus.

Contents:

I. FORMAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND PETITION FOR INVESTIGATION
on the grounds of suspected collective and systemically institutionalized perjury in office (Section 154 of the German Criminal Code [StGB] in conjunction with Article 56 and Article 64 of the Basic Law [GG]), as well as all applicable constitutional and criminal offenses.

II. Pleading 2026-09-19, Clarification and Supplement to the Criminal Complaint: Deconstruction of the Dogmatic Term "State Action"

III. Pleading 2026-09-22, Extension of the Investigatory Case File / Criminal Complaint and Petition for Prosecution: "Collective Perjury"

IV. Pleading 2026-09-23, Preventive Submission Supplement Dated September 23, 2026 (Part 1)

V. Pleading 2026-09-23, Preventive Submission Supplement Dated September 23, 2026 (Part 2)

VI. Pleading 2026-09-24, Systems Analysis and Dogmatic Legal Representation, September 24, 2026 (Part 1)

VII. Pleading 2026-09-24, Preventive Submission Supplement Dated September 24, 2026 (Part 2)

VIII. Pleading 2026-09-24, Preventive, Subsequent Pleading Supplement Dated September 24, 2026 (Part 3)

IX. Pleading 2026-09-24, Criminal Complaint and Petition for Criminal Prosecution, False Certification 2026-09-24

X. Pleading 2026-09-26, Abuse of Legal Persona / Legal Personality

XI. Pleading 2026-09-26, Forced Displacement

XII. Pleading 2026-09-28, Account Blockade and Execution of Life-Sustaining Measures for Daily Necessities Concluded

XIII. Pleading 2026-09-30, Criminal Complaint and Petition for Prosecution, The acting, employed staff, reception of VR-Bank Mittelfranken Mitte eG concluded

XIV. Pleading 2026-10-06, Criminal Complaint and Petition for Criminal Prosecution, False Certification, 2026-10-06

XV. Pleading 2026-10-09, Emergency Application and Urgent Notification Regarding Absolute Assumption of Liability for Consequential Damages Resulting from the Arbitrary Disruption of the Gas Supply and Endangerment of Life

XVI. Criminal Complaint and Formal Petition for Criminal Prosecution Regarding Suspicion of Collective Perjury in Office, Systemic False Certification in Public Service (§ 348 StGB), and Constitutional Sabotage of the Legal Order (§ 88 StGB / § 120 GVG)

XVII. Application for Extraction from Official Custody and Urgent Notice of Systemic Form Defects

XVIII. Pleading 2026-10-14, Supplementary pleading regarding the complex of offenses of "Collective Breach of Trust and Systemic Perjury within the Economic Area"

XIX. Empirical Case Study, 2026-10-19, Fries Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaft mbB, Family Law

XX. Further additional information, 2026-10-19, Formal clarification and notification

XXI. Pleading Supplement, 2026-10-20, Empirically Documented Encroachment by KSP Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH: The Demoralization of Form and the Activation of Private Liability within Institutional Governance Structures

XXII. Organized Irresponsibility vs. Organized, Systemic Indemnification. Core Theme: The structural analysis of state liability exemptions, parliamentary immunity, and the systemic shifting of financial and civil risks from institutional actors to the public.

XXIII. The Paradox of State Foundation, the 'FRG', and the Legally Enacted Deception of Both Sides (FRG and GDR). Core Theme: The jurisprudential deconstruction of the 1949 and 1990 legal transitions, examining the circular logic of state legitimacy and the boundary definition of territorial jurisdiction.