Published November 2025 | Version v2

Responsiveness of Cyber Security Operation Center of the Philippine National Police to Data Breaches: Basis for Enhancement

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Philippine College of Criminology

Description

The study titled “Responsiveness of the Cyber Security Operation Center of the Philippine National Police to Data Breaches: Basis for Enhancement” evaluated how effectively the PNP CSOC addresses data breaches, the challenges it faces, and areas for improvement. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, the researchers gathered data from 45 PNP personnel through surveys and interviewed 5 CSOC staff. The investigation covered four major domains: Detection and Analysis; Mitigation, Isolation, and Recovery; Post-Incident Activity; and Prevention and Monitoring. Results showed that while real-time monitoring and machine-learning tools supported effective detection, issues such as high data volume, alert fatigue, complex threats, limited system visibility, and inadequate training remained. Mitigation and recovery protocols worked well for familiar threats but were less effective for emerging attacks, with delays in restoring systems and insufficient automation. Post-incident procedures lacked consistency due to missing standardized templates and limited time, though sharing insights and lessons learned was practiced. Prevention and monitoring strategies functioned adequately but required more advanced detection tools, regular updates, and stronger threat intelligence integration. Overall, the study found that although the PNP CSOC has a solid foundation, improvements in technology, training, policy development, procedures, and inter-agency cooperation are essential. Recommendations focused on upgrading cybersecurity tools, enhancing continuous training, formalizing protocols, strengthening threat intelligence sharing, and increasing resources.

Files

9 - Sanico - Responsiveness of PNP Cyber Security Operation Center.docx.pdf

Files (365.0 kB)

Additional details

References

  • Alqudhaibi A., Deshpande S., Jagtap S., & Salonitis K. (2023). Towards a sustainable future: developing a cybersecurity framework for manufacturing. Technological Sustainability, 2(4), 372–387. https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/server/api/core/bitstreams/1
  • Backman, S. B. (2015). Organising National Cybersecurity Centres. Information & Security: An International Journal, 32, 3206-1 to 3206-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.11610/isij.3206
  • Booc, N.B.B. (2024). Cybersecurity Awareness, and Cybersecurity Behavior of High School Students in Davao City: A Mediation Role of Perceived Behavioral Control. European Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology, 2(3), 4–9.
  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Department of Homeland Security (DHS). (2022). Federal Cybersecurity Operations Center Framework. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Department of Science and Technology (DOST). (2023). Philippine Science and Technology Cybersecurity Report. Quezon City: DOST.
  • European Union. (2019). Cybersecurity Act. Brussels: EU Publications.
  • European Union. (2022). Digital Services Act. Brussels: EU Publications.
  • European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA). (2020). Incident response best practices. Athens: ENISA Publications.
  • Ethical Research Guide. (2019). Guidelines for research involving human participants. [Publisher details].
  • Godoy, C.H., Lerit, J.C., Jehru, N., Diego, R., & Costales, J.A. (2022, July). Cybersecurity Scientometric Analysis: Mapping of Scientific Articles using Scopus API for Data Mining and Webscrapping. 2022 5th International Conference on Data Science and Information Technology (DSIT 2022). China.
  • Hawamleh, H., Alqudhaibi, A., & Saeed, M. (2020). Qualitative approaches in cybersecurity research. Journal of Information Security Studies, 15(2), 45–60.
  • International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Singapore, Singapore. https://index.ieomsociety.org/index.cfm/article/view/ID/1122
  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2023). ISO/IEC 27035: Information security incident management. Geneva: ISO.
  • International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2023). Global Cybersecurity Index 2023. Geneva: ITU
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2012). Computer Security Incident Handling Guide (SP 800- 61). Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2023). Cybersecurity workforce book: Building and sustaining the cybersecurity workforce. U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/search?q=https://www.nist.gov/cybersecurity-workforce-book-latest-edition
  • National Cybersecurity Plan 2022. (2016, December 8). DICT. https://dict.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/NCSP2022.pdf
  • National Cybersecurity Plan 2023-2028. (2024, February). DICT.https://dict.gov.ph/national-cyber-security-plan
  • National Privacy Commission (NPC). (2022). Annual Report on Data Breaches in the Philippines. Quezon City: NPC.
  • Norona, M. I., & Aquino, F. A. (2021, March 7–11). Enhancing Cyber Security in the Philippine Academe: A Risk-Based IT Project Assessment Approach. 11th Annual
  • Pahi, D., et al. (2017). Exploring operational challenges in cybersecurity centers. International Journal of Information Security Studies, 9(3), 112–125.
  • Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ). (2021). Cybersecurity and data breach cases in the Philippines. Manila: PCIJ.
  • Philippine National Police (PNP). (2023). Cyber Security Operations Center (CSOC) Operational Framework. Quezon City: Directorate for ICT Management.
  • PNP DICTM. (2021). Directorate for Information and Communication Technology Management Administrative and Operations Manual. PNP DICTM, Camp Crame, Quezon City, Philippines.
  • Republic Act No. 10175 Implementing Rules and Regulations. (2015). DOJ Office of Cybercrime. https://cybercrime.doj.gov.ph/irr/
  • Purposive Sampling Guide. (2016). Principles of purposive sampling in qualitative research. [Publisher details].
  • Qualitative Methods Text. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Foundations and applications. [Publisher details].
  • Sahagun, J. C. (2024, March 10). Cybersecurity Threat: The Hacking of Websites of Owwa & Philippine Coast Guard. Metro Manila, Philippines. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378853142
  • Scarfone, K., Benigni, D. and Grance, T. (2009), Cyber Security Standards, Wiley Handbook of Science and Technology for Homeland Security, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ. https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=152153
  • Singapore Cyber Security Agency (CSA Singapore). (2021). National Cybersecurity Strategy. Singapore: CSA.
  • Sy, J. (2020). Data breaches and public trust in Philippine institutions. Philippine Journal of Information Security, 12(1), 33–47.
  • Tuscano, J. (2024, May). Cybersecurity Awareness Among Senior High School Students in District of Tanza: Basis for Cyber Education Program in Schools. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381021932
  • World Economic Forum (WEF). (2024). Global Risks Report 2024. Geneva: WEF.