Published October 26, 2026 | Version v1

Recent Trends and Future Scope of Ultrasonic Machining in Aerospace Applications

Description

Ultrasonic machining (USM) and its derivative processes—rotary ultrasonic machining (RUM), ultrasonic vibration-assisted machining (UVAM), and multi-dimensional (elliptical) vibration machining—have become important enabling technologies for the manufacture of aerospace components made from difficult-to-cut materials such as titanium alloys, nickel-based superalloys, carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers, and particle- and ceramic-matrix composites. This paper reviews recent trends in ultrasonic machining research relevant to aerospace applications, covering process fundamentals, material-specific developments, hybrid energy-field-assisted variants, and reported improvements in cutting force, tool wear, delamination, and surface integrity. Persistent challenges relating to material removal rate, tool and horn design, process modeling, and shop-floor integration are discussed, followed by an outlook on multi-physics modeling, sensor-integrated adaptive control, hybrid manufacturing, and sustainability-driven process development that are expected to shape the future scope of ultrasonic machining in the aerospace sector.

Files

Recent Trends and Future Scope of Ultrasonic.pdf

Files (317.5 kB)

Name Size
md5:f7ee3080c2c6418ec1c9e19feeb6413e
317.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Aamir, M., Tolouei-Rad, M., Giasin, K., & Nosrati, A. (2019). Recent advances in drilling of carbon fiber reinforced polymers for aerospace applications: A review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 105, 2289–2308
  • Chen, J., & Liu, R. (2023). A comprehensive review of advances in ultrasonic vibration machining on SiCp/Al composites. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 25, 1421–1440
  • Chowdhury, M. A. K. (2017). Drilling high precision holes in Ti6Al4V using rotary ultrasonic machining and uncertainties underlying cutting force, tool wear, and production inaccuracies. Micromachines, 8(9), Article 273
  • Guo, P., Ehmann, K. F., & Wang, X. (2017). Study on rotary ultrasonic-assisted drilling of titanium alloys (Ti6Al4V) using 8-facet drill under no cooling condition. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 90, 3399–3411
  • Gupta, M. K., Mia, M., Pimenov, D. Y., et al. (2021). Ultrasonic vibration-assisted machining of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites: A review of process parameters, defects, and future perspectives. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 62, 508–530.
  • Kumar, K., & Agarwal, P. K. (2025). Rotary ultrasonic machining of advance materials: A review. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. Article 109250.
  • Li, S., et al. (2024). Ultrasonic vibration cutting of advanced aerospace materials: A critical review of in-service functional performance. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing and Special Equipment.
  • Li, Z. C., Cai, Y., Pei, Z. J., & Treadwell, C. (2008). Rotary ultrasonic machining of titanium alloy: Effects of tool variables. International Journal of Precision Technology, 1(1), 49–68.
  • M'Saoubi, R., Axinte, D., Soo, S. L., Nobel, C., Attia, H., Kappmeyer, G., Engin, S., & Sim, W.-M. (2015). High performance cutting of advanced aerospace alloys and composite materials. CIRP Annals, 64(2), 557–580.
  • Pei, Z. J., Prabhakar, A., Ferreira, P. M., & Haselkorn, M. (1995). A mechanistic approach to the prediction of material removal rates in rotary ultrasonic machining. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 117(2), 142–151.