There is a newer version of the record available.

Published October 25, 2026 | Version Version 1.0
Preprint Open

無窮遠點不是我的規律:從分層搬返到全息的玩具模型

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Independent Researcher

Description

【中文摘要 / Chinese Abstract】

本文從「一圈一洞」的直觀出發,建立一個分層搬返模型:上維可見,下維隱藏,投影會漏資訊,搬返才能見全相。用這個模型,本文批評霍奇猜想、BSD 猜想、Tate 猜想、黎曼猜想、P vs NP 依賴「不可見結構」,而這些結構不是肉眼可見的規律。本文進一步把模型推廣到橢圓曲線、Jacobian、模形式、Hecke 算子、L-函數、Galois 表示、範疇論與全息原理。本文不是數學證明,而是數學哲學與概念模型。本文的立場是:可見的直觀是根,不可見的補充不是根。

【English Abstract】

I start from a simple intuition: a torus has one hole. This hole is visible. It does not depend on projective space, compactness, or points at infinity. The Hodge Conjecture, the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture, the Tate Conjecture, the Riemann Hypothesis, and the P vs NP problem all depend on invisible structures. In this paper, I argue that these invisible structures are not visible rules; they are added later to make formal theories work. I build a toy framework called the layered return model consisting of an upper layer, a lower layer, a projection, and a return mapping. Projection loses information; return restores it. I test this framework at a toy level on elliptic curves, Jacobians, modular forms, Hecke operators, L-functions, Galois representations, category theory, and holography. This is not a mathematical proof, but a philosophical critique and a conceptual framework. The unwavering position of this paper is: the visible intuition is the foundation; the invisible addition is not.

Files

Infinity Is Not My Rule_(Chi).pdf

Files (1.9 MB)

Name Size
md5:160416cb3a163e2e72f30ee22c7321ba
1.2 MB Preview Download
md5:611695fdc2283cbdae00c153a2624811
776.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Additional titles

Translated title (English)
Infinity Is Not My Rule: A Toy Framework from Layered Return to Holography

Dates

Other
2026-10-25

References

  • P. Deligne, "The Hodge conjecture," Clay Mathematics Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA, Millennium Prize Problems Description, 2000.
  • L. E. J. Brouwer, "Intuitionism and formalism," Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 81–96, Nov. 1913.
  • A. Wiles, "Modular elliptic curves and Fermat's last theorem," Ann. Math., vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 443–551, May 1995.
  • A. Wiles, "The Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture," Clay Mathematics Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA, Millennium Prize Problems Description, 2000
  • Tate, "Algebraic cycles and poles of zeta functions," in Arithmetical Algebraic Geometry, New York, NY, USA: Harper & Row, 1965, pp. 93–110
  • E. Bombieri, "The Riemann hypothesis," Clay Mathematics Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA, Millennium Prize Problems Description, 2000.
  • S. Cook, "The P versus NP problem," Clay Mathematics Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA, Millennium Prize Problems Description, 2000
  • S. Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag, 1971.
  • J. M. Maldacena, "The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity," Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 231–252, 1998
  • S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, "Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT," Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 96, no. 18, p. 181602, May 2006