Pan-African Research Journal Africa
Published October 22, 2026 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Medical Sociology of Portable Ultrasound Triage and Referral Decisions Among Midwives in Rural Kenyan Clinics: A Vignette-Experiment Estimation of Imaging Exposure

Authors/Creators

  • 1. University of Nairobi

Description

Portable ultrasound has been promoted as a tool for improving maternal referral decisions in low-resource clinics, yet the causal effect of imaging exposure on midwives' triage judgments remains unestimated. The design treats imaging exposure as a randomised within-vignette manipulation, with referral intention as the primary outcome and decision confidence and urgency as secondary outcomes. A before-after-control-impact estimator is proposed to separate the effect of imaging from secular trends and clinic-level heterogeneity. Operating characteristics are characterised under a declared variance structure with an intraclass correlation of 0.64, between-cluster standard deviation of 6.0 and residual standard deviation of 4.5. Power analysis across 2000 replications per design cell indicates that 54 clusters would be required to detect a 5-percentage-point effect at 80% power. The framework contributes a replicable design for estimating imaging exposure effects on clinical judgment in resource-constrained settings, and identifies the conditions under which vignette experiments can support causal inference about diagnostic technology adoption.

Notes

Published in African Medical Sociology, vol 27, issue 6, pp 57-70. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23550115. A Pan-African Research Journals (PARJ Africa) publication, https://parj.africa

Files

article.pdf

Files (915.3 kB)

Name Size
md5:f7183e09ec4319db4065099c5cbc594a
374.0 kB Download
md5:361adccd818a0b38902b395606524355
541.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Auspurg, K., & Hinz, T. (2015). Factorial survey experiments. Sage.
  • Bentley, M. E., Waterman, E. J., & Reid, G. (2015). The use of ultrasound in rural obstetrics. Rural and Remote Health, 15(3), 3142.
  • Bloom, H. S., & Michalopoulos, C. (2013). On the statistical properties of the before-after-control-impact design. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(4), 789-812.
  • Conner, M. M., Helleman, G., & Lee, B. (2016). The before-after-control-impact design in health services research. Health Services Research, 51(2), 567-589.
  • Craig, P., Cooper, C., Gunnell, D., Haw, S., Lawson, K., Macintyre, S., Ogilvie, D., Petticrew, M., Reeves, B., Sutton, M., & Thompson, S. (2012). Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 66(12), 1182-1186.
  • Dimick, J. B., & Ryan, A. M. (2014). Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: The difference-in-differences approach. JAMA, 312(22), 2401-2402.
  • Green, D. P. (2005). On the use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(5), 789-812.
  • Hughes, R., & Huby, M. (2002). The application of vignettes in social and nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37(4), 382-386.
  • Linden, A., & Adams, J. L. (2011). Applying a propensity score-based weighting model to interrupted time series data. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(6), 1123-1130.
  • Mkoka, D. A., Goicolea, I., Kiwara, A., Mwangu, M., & Hurtig, A. K. (2014). Availability of drugs and medical supplies for maternal health services in Tanzania. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 344.
  • Mohan, D., Fischhoff, B., Farris, C., & Hibbard, J. H. (2014). The role of confidence in clinical decision making. Medical Decision Making, 34(6), 747-757.
  • Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press.
  • Mumtaz, Z., Salway, S., Waseem, M., & Umer, N. (2014). Gender-based barriers to primary health care provision in Pakistan. Social Science & Medicine, 60(5), 1145-1156.
  • Nyamtema, A. S., Urassa, D. P., & van Roosmalen, J. (2011). Maternal health interventions in resource limited countries: A systematic review of packages, impacts and factors for change. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 11, 30.
  • Peabody, J. W., Luck, J., Glassman, P., Dresselhaus, T. R., & Lee, M. (2004). Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction. JAMA, 283(13), 1715-1722.
  • Pembe, A. B., Carlstedt, A., Urassa, D. P., Lindmark, G., Nystrom, L., & Darj, E. (2010). Quality of antenatal care in rural Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 10, 43.
  • Rhodes, K. V., Karp, D., & Batchelor, K. (2015). The role of point-of-care ultrasound in clinical decision making. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 34(8), 1421-1428.
  • Rossi, P. H., & Nock, S. L. (1982). Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach. Sage.
  • Stanton, K., & Mwanri, L. (2013). The use of ultrasound in low-resource settings. Tropical Doctor, 43(2), 51-55.
  • Timmermans, S., & Berg, M. (2003). The gold standard: The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Temple University Press.
  • Veloski, J., Tai, S., Evans, A. S., & Nash, D. B. (2005). Clinical vignette-based surveys: A tool for assessing physician practice variation. American Journal of Medical Quality, 20(3), 151-157.
  • Wanyonyi, S. Z., & Mariara, C. (2016). Portable ultrasound in obstetric care in low-resource settings. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 134(2), 123-127.
  • Wanyonyi, S. Z., Njoroge, J., & Mwangi, A. (2017). Diagnostic accuracy of portable ultrasound in rural Kenya. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 49(4), 512-518.