Published October 20, 2026 | Version v1

Why Computational Humanities needs falsifiable theories

Description

Computational humanities has powerful tools and abundant data, but too little research tests

falsifiable theories. We argue for a shift: dedicating a share of research effort to theory-driven

hypothesis testing, coexisting with descriptive scholarship and exploration. We review some past

attempts at building theory-driven research programmes in the humanities and outside of them,

some successful, some not. Successful turns towards theory-driven research do not diminish the

relevance or importance of descriptive work but make it more focused. We show how emerging

theories can supply predictive frameworks usable by computational humanities and outline

practical steps for bridging gaps between theory-driven and descriptive research programmes.

Files

collective-theories-paper.pdf

Files (565.5 kB)

Name Size
md5:04b394cf7afba9097323242b19e0c954
565.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

This work has received support under the Major Research Program of PSL Research University "CultureLab" launched by PSL Research University and implemented by ANR with the reference ANR-10-IDEX-0001.