Published October 20, 2026 | Version 1.0

Autonomous Relationship Engine: Persistent Intent, Goal-State Evaluation, and Cognitive Memory for Enterprise Agentic Execution

Description

Enterprise information systems remain strongly organized around persistent entities, CRUD operations, and prede-

fined workflow states. These mechanisms are effective for deterministic transactions, but provide limited architectural

support for interactions whose desired outcome is expressed as an evolving goal over heterogeneous context. Large

Language Model (LLM) agents provide adaptive planning and tool orchestration, yet their probabilistic execution

introduces challenges concerning bounded execution, authorization, state divergence, memory continuity, and au-

ditable control. This paper proposes the Autonomous Relationship Engine (ARE), a Design Science Research (DSR)

artifact centered on a persistent, time-bounded Intent Node as a unit of enterprise agentic execution. An Intent Node

is modeled as I(t) = <G, C, P, M(t), S(t)>, where Gt represents an operational goal specification, Ct hard constraints,

Pt runtime policy, Mt cognitive memory, and St authoritative execution-domain state. ARE distinguishes incoming

intent from an active commitment and defines commitment-scoped action admissibility over the active commitment,

authoritative state, action scope, and deterministic policy decision. Goal satisfaction is evaluated through Φ(Gt , St ),

while candidate actions are generated through probabilistic planning and subjected to a Policy Decision Point (PDP)

expressed through Policy-as-Code (PaC) before controlled execution. A tri-modal memory model provides episodic,

semantic, and procedural context while remaining non-authoritative for authorization. The paper formalizes the

commitment lifecycle, goal-state evaluation, bounded execution, policy enforcement, memory authority boundaries,

and a reproducible experimental protocol, including a falsifiable ablation of commitment-linked cognitive-context re-

construction after interruption, state change, policy update, and session resumption. The contribution is positioned

as an architectural synthesis and formalization rather than a claim of novel individual mechanisms or experimentally

established performance; the proposed evaluation criteria remain hypotheses for subsequent validation.

Files

ARE_Preprint_ARXIV_FINAL_CLEAN.pdf

Files (155.4 kB)

Name Size
md5:4db29624f8a4fe6807bf6f5064e1e396
155.4 kB Preview Download