Published October 19, 2026 | Version v1

Battery Internal-Resistance Misestimation in Student-Built Engineering Education Cell-Test Benches: A Four-Wire Kelvin Probe Evaluation Linking Contact Resistance to State-of-Health Classification Reliability

  • 1. University of Mauritius

Description

Student-built cell-test benches in engineering education frequently report internal resistance from two-wire measurements, yet the contact resistance at the probe-electrode interface is rarely separated from the cell's own ohmic resistance. The model treats the measured resistance as the sum of the cell's true internal resistance and a contact term whose magnitude depends on probe geometry, electrode surface condition and applied force. A sensitivity analysis over plausible bench parameters shows that a contact resistance of 5 mΩ, well within the range reported for student-assembled fixtures, can shift a 50 mΩ cell across a 20% state-of-health threshold when the reference resistance is drawn from a single baseline measurement. The derived reliability bound is expressed as a function of the ratio of contact resistance to cell resistance and the width of the classification band. The contribution is a design rule: a four-wire Kelvin probe with a contact-resistance ceiling of 1 mΩ or less, verified against a calibration shunt before each session, keeps classification error below 5% for cells above 40 mΩ. The analysis is methodological and does not report primary measurements; it specifies the probe geometry, calibration procedure and acceptance criterion that a student bench must satisfy to produce state-of-health labels that are stable under repeated measurement.

Notes

Published in African Journal of Engineering and Technology Education, vol 2, issue 1, pp 71-84. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23470064. A Pan-African Research Journals (PARJ Africa) publication, https://parj.africa

Files

article.pdf

Files (435.6 kB)

Name Size
md5:d5eedbaae4d1f55f56662a9c4be56615
136.2 kB Download
md5:aff1dea15ae9434445dcb0ad672879ae
299.4 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • BIPM. (2019). Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology.
  • Farmann, A., Waag, W., Marongiu, A., & Sauer, D. U. (2015). Critical review of on-board capacity estimation techniques for lithium-ion batteries in electric and hybrid electric vehicles. Journal of Power Sources, 281, 114–130.
  • Holm, R. (1967). Electric contacts: Theory and application (4th ed.). Springer-Verlag.
  • Kelvin, W. T. (1861). On the measurement of electric resistance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 11, 512–515.
  • Keysight Technologies. (2018). Impedance measurement handbook: A guide to measurement technology and techniques (6th ed.). Keysight Technologies.
  • Plett, G. L. (2015). Battery management systems, Volume II: Equivalent-circuit methods. Artech House.
  • Sawada, K., Oji, H., & Takai, K. (2018). Contact resistance variation in spring-loaded probes for lithium-ion cell testing. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 67(9), 2104–2112.
  • Timsit, R. S. (1999). Electrical contact resistance: Properties of stationary interfaces. IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, 22(1), 85–98.
  • Waag, W., Käbitz, S., & Sauer, D. U. (2014). Experimental investigation of the lithium-ion battery impedance characteristic at various conditions and aging states and its influence on the application. Applied Energy, 102, 885–897.