Published October 19, 2026 | Version v1.31

Generative Structural Theory v1.31 — Bidirected K4 Subdivisions: Exact Counting and Minimality

Authors/Creators

  • 1. SD Lab LLC

Description

The parent relation is K_4 with each of its six edges replaced by a path of length l_ij >= 1, inner nodes not shared, every pair present (bidirected); for its spanning sub-relations this manuscript counts the strongly connected ones (s), the inclusion-minimal ones (mu) and the least number of pairs of one (mc). A sub-relation is strongly connected iff on every path it is in one of four states (every forward pair and at least one backward pair missing; every backward pair and at least one forward pair missing; all pairs; or exactly one empty edge with every other edge two-way) and its projection to the four branch nodes is strongly connected; for a path of length l the states number 2^l - 1, 2^l - 1, 1 and l. Hence s is a weighted sum over the strongly connected relations on the four branch nodes, and cut inclusion-exclusion with the preorder grouping of v1.30 gives it as a sum over chain forests, the coefficients of v1.30 being unchanged by the weights. A member is minimal iff every path is a pure directed path, the full two-way path or a state with one empty edge, and every pair of the projection coming from a two-way path or from a path of length 1 is essential in the projection; the pairs of a pure directed path of length at least 2 can never be removed, so the projection of a minimal member need not be minimal. mu is a weighted count of such projections, and mc the least cost over the strongly connected projections (2l, l or 2(l - 1) per path); a 4-cycle construction gives an upper bound, which is not claimed to be the least value. For all lengths 1 the formulas reduce to the values of v1.30 (1606, 58, 4); with one path of length 2 and the other five of length 1, s = 3402 (by two arrangements), mu = 82, mc = 5; with all lengths 2, s = 140367, mu = 344, mc = 12. Minimally strongly connected digraphs and the counting of strongly connected digraphs are studied in the literature; no novelty is claimed. The proofs and counts are presented as symbolic arguments, without machine enumeration or numerical computation on the relations studied. AI assistance was used in drafting and review, as detailed in the disclosures. Parent relations with one-way edges and other subdivided graphs are not treated.

Files

GST_v1.31_paper.pdf

Files (306.2 kB)

Name Size
md5:9b1de73a08b0ca94a0058645d0be415b
263 Bytes Download
md5:6959abd0c8e376eb50f28f9bfeac730a
123.1 kB Preview Download
md5:9b57ee63cf7b6557ff3d877d14fb8a79
55.9 kB Preview Download
md5:0368d8524a020851d6530c520339bc9f
127.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References