Published October 14, 2026 | Version 1.0

Parakeet vs Whisper Turbo and Distil on CPU

  • 1. Loudness.ai

Description

We evaluated three Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 configurations and two quantized Whisper variants on identical English reading audio using four CPU threads. On a 310.425-second recording, Parakeet FP32 with shorter chunks took 53.58 seconds with 2.81% word error rate (23 edits across 818 reference words) and 2.87 GiB peak process memory. Whisper Turbo INT8 took 343.26 seconds with 2.20% WER; Distil-Whisper INT8 took 279.10 seconds with 2.57% WER. Default Parakeet INT8 chunks omitted substantial speech; shorter chunks reduced WER from 39.12% to 4.65%. These single-request observations favor FP32 Parakeet for this CPU and sample, while the tested Whisper variants made fewer word edits. We publish all 18 completed runs, transcripts, fixture audio, references, checksums and reproduction settings.

Files

LA-RB-2026-001-en.pdf

Files (17.4 MB)

Name Size
md5:a0ddf62aa570e1dfb2a4ea95004c6d7f
27.9 kB Preview Download
md5:adba13fe7f47fe4f52cea6fa5f9679d3
17.4 MB Preview Download