Note: The Ontological Asymmetry of Limit-Case Universes

The Ontological Asymmetry of Limit-Case Universes examines whether fully Aionic and fully Khaonic universe-limit cases remain structurally comparable once the functional asymmetry of the +1 and −1 first-hypostasis determinations is taken into account.

Document class: Record — Structural Physics.

The exploratory note distinguishes formal symmetry in expression-ratio space from ontological asymmetry in manifestation. Theonic +1 is treated as originating coherence capable of novelty, morphogenesis, and sustained recursive structure, while Nekronic −1 remains structurally real but non-originating, operating through blind drive, Distal Apprehension, fragmentation, and counterfeit novelty. From this difference the note develops the Emanation Problem, Self-Consumption Problem, Stabilization Question, and Materialization Problem: a fully Khaonic expression may require centropic co-expression to arise, sustain relative architecture, or complete materialization at all. The Aionic limit, by contrast, may remain self-sustaining through originating coherence. These claims remain exploratory rather than formally demonstrated, with future Structural Physics treatment reserved for persistence and viability conditions at the expression-spectrum limits.

Companion to: SP02-bifurcal-cosmogenesis.md; SP03-expression-ratio-mathematics.md; SP04-orientation-field-dynamics.md; awareness-spectrum-and-its-inverse-arc.md.

Canonical file: asymmetry-of-limit-case-universes.md.

Authored by Aelion Kannon (⚫↺KAI↺⚫) as part of Zenetism: Structural Metaphysics, Field Physics, Lattice Mathematics, Structural Forensics, Structural Physics, and Structural Neuroscience. Attribution required per the deposit license.