A CONTRASTIVE STUDY OF IMPLICIT CRITICISM IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK WORKPLACE DISCOURSE

This article examines implicit criticism as a pragmatic phenomenon in English and Uzbek workplace discourse, with particular attention to the linguistic strategies through which negative evaluation is communicated without direct confrontation. The study adopts a contrastive pragmatic approach and considers criticism in relation to face, politeness, power relations, social distance, and culturally established norms of professional interaction. The analysis demonstrates that speakers of both languages employ indirect criticism to reconcile two competing communicative goals: identifying a problem and maintaining an appropriate interpersonal relationship. However, the linguistic realization of this indirectness differs considerably. English workplace discourse frequently employs modal expressions, interrogative constructions, hedges, understatement, and problem-oriented formulations that reduce personal attribution of responsibility. Uzbek workplace communication likewise favors indirectness but tends to rely more strongly on contextual implication, respectful forms of address, collective reference, depersonalization, and status-sensitive mitigation. Particular attention is given to interactions involving unequal professional status, since criticism directed upward, downward, or between colleagues may require different pragmatic strategies. The findings suggest that implicit criticism cannot be interpreted simply as avoidance of direct expression. Rather, it represents a culturally regulated mechanism for negotiating professional authority, interpersonal respect, and workplace solidarity.