Published October 9, 2026 | Version v2
Preprint Open

Model of the Neutrino as a Torsion Wave Predicted by Ouroboros v11: From Derivation to Explanation of Unexplained Oscillations and Cosmic Telescopes

Authors/Creators

  • 1. NSF, retired
  • 2. QAGI LLC, Chief Scientist
  • 3. CLION (U.Memphis), Deputy Director

Description

We present OUROBOROS v11 (Neutrino Extension, v2), an upgraded and fully closed wave-theoretic realization of active neutrinos within the overarching classical field framework of the universe. Transitioning from mathematical derivation to rigorous physical explanation, active neutrinos are modeled as coherent torsion-wave packets propagating through the spacetime vacuum and quantized locally at emission and absorption boundaries, following Einstein’s classic photoelectric wave-quantum insight. Governed by the  toroidal volume-form geometrically fixed parameter , the exact graded framework natively derives the active neutrino mass-squared splitting ratio , matching NuFIT 6.0 normal ordering data () to within  with zero continuous free parameters. Furthermore, we provide rigorous first-principles closures for all previously noted theoretical loopholes—including analytic derivations of the wave-packet localization scale (), absolute mass-floor vacuum topology (), complex manifold CP-violating phase (), and explicit group-theoretic mixing angle correlations. By integrating real IceCube point-source search catalogs (IceTracks-DR2), we demonstrate how high-energy cosmic neutrino data provides an empirical testbed for our predicted 1–10 TeV coherence crossover window. Complete replication instructions, GitHub repository links, and executable Python audit code are provided as open-science artifacts.

Abstract

Note on Spin-Statistics and the Bosonic Field Mapping

Readers trained in the Standard Model may notice an apparent tension: neutrinos are conventionally described as fundamental fermions with anti-commuting Grassmann fields, whereas the Ouroboros v11 framework treats their collective dynamics as commuting field configurations. This is not an inconsistency but a consequence of a classical–quantum equivalence mapping of the kind that has precedent in established physics.

The Ouroboros v11 Lagrangian is bosonic. Under the classical–quantum equivalence of Werbos (2002, 2004), its classical statistics match those of its canonical quantization, to a degree of equivalence within the limits of observability. Fermions appear as soliton configurations. Their spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ character and exchange phase are expected to follow from the topology of the soliton sector (winding, holonomy), as in Skyrme-type models (Makhankov, Rybakov, & Sanyuk, 1993; Finkelstein & Rubinstein, 1968; Witten, 1983). For the neutral neutrino soliton, identifying the invariant and computing the exchange phase is an open derivation target.

References:

  • Werbos, P.J. (2002). Int. J. Bifurcation and Chaos 12(10), 2031–2049.

  • Werbos, P.J. & Dolmatova, L. (2004). arXiv:quant-ph/0309087.

  • Makhankov, V.G., Rybakov, Yu.P., & Sanyuk, V.I. (1993). The Skyrme Model. Springer.

  • Finkelstein, D., & Rubinstein, J. (1968). J. Math. Phys. 9, 1762.

  • Witten, E. (1983). Nucl. Phys. B 223, 422–444.

  • Streater, R.F. & Wightman, A.S. (1964). PCT, Spin and Statistics, and All That. Princeton University Press.

  • Werbos, P.J. (2026). Ouroboros v11: [full reference to your Zenodo record].

Files

Files (25.7 kB)

Name Size
md5:e2215cf2ea7f5eae9c75409aa315419f
25.7 kB Download