Published October 8, 2026 | Version v1
Journal article Open

THE ANCIENT GENEALOGY OF FEMALE GENDER DISCRIMINATION: A PHILOSOPHICAL EXPLORATION

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Department of Classics, University of Ibadan, Nigeria

Description

Female gender discrimination is frequently treated as an ancient inheritance whose origins lie in the recognition of biological differences. However, such an approach risks reducing antiquity to a homogeneous history of female oppression. Therefore, this study challenges that assumption through a philosophical genealogy of gender hierarchy across selected ancient societies. Drawing on Mesopotamian law, ancient Egyptian evidence, Greek poetry and philosophy, the study argues that discrimination emerged not from the recognition of sexual difference but from the process by which difference was classified, naturalised institutionalised and reproduced. Aristotle provides the clearest philosophical example of this process when biological distinctions between men and women are connected to political authority relations. By contrast, Plato offers an important counter-genealogy by arguing that sexual difference does not necessarily determine civic function or educational capacity. Egyptian legal evidence and the recovery of ancient women philosophers further demonstrate that antiquity cannot be reduced to a uniform history of female subordination. This study proposes a six-stage genealogical model—difference, classification, naturalisation, hierarchy, institutionalisation and reproduction- and argues that its central philosophical significance lies in exposing the invalid movement from descriptive difference to normative inequality. By reconstructing these intellectual and institutional genealogies, this study illuminates the historical formation of patriarchal assumptions and their enduring significance for contemporary philosophical debates on gender equality, justice, and human dignity.

Files

THE_ANCIENT_GENEALOGY_OF_FEMALE_GENDER_DISCRIMINATION_A_PHILOSOPHICAL_EXPLORATION_1.pdf

Files (836.8 kB)

Additional details

Related works

Is part of
2997-1470 (ISSN)

References

  • Adebowale, B. A. (2015). Legislative ideology as a feminist trope in Homeric and Nigeria societies. Nigeria and the Classics, Vol. 29, 94-117.
  • Adebowale, B. A. (2017). Oedipus' moral responsibility in Sophocles' Oedipus Tyrannus. The International Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, Vol.5, Issue 9, 44-52 (www.theijhss.com).
  • Adebowale, B. A., & Akinboye, G. A. (2017). Between the margins and the mainstream: The odyssey of women in Greek and Yoruba thoughts. Journal of Communication and Language Arts (JCLA), Vol. 8, No. 1: 7-25
  • Adebowale, B. A. (2024). The dark side of Olympus: Rape culture and male dominance in ancient Greek mythology Ibadan Journal of Theatre Arts (IJOTA): Vol.16/17: 165-183.
  • Akinboye, G. A., & Adebowale, B. A. (2017). The three faces of Greek and Aristotelian rhetoric. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 4, 15-24
  • Aristotle. (1984). Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation (J. Barnes, Ed.). Princeton University Press.
  • Aristotle. (1998). Politics (C. D. C. Reeve, Trans.). Hackett Publishing.
  • Aristotle. (1999). Generation of animals (A. L. Peck, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
  • Beauvoir, S. de. (2011). The second sex (C. Borde & S. Malovany-Chevallier, Trans.). Vintage.
  • Butler, J. (2006). Gender trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
  • Calvert, B. (1975). Plato and the equality of women. Phoenix, Vol.29 (3), 231-243.
  • Connell, S. M. (2021). Aristotle on women: Physiology, psychology, and politics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Denicol, K. A., & Bittencourt, P. J. S. (2019). The legal status of woman in ancient Mesopotamia: Codes of Ur-Nammu and Hammurabi. Revista Internacional CONSINTER de Direito, Vol. 9, 73-90.
  • Deretic, I. (2015). Why does a woman's deliberative faculty have no authority? Aristotle on the political role of women. Filozofija I drustvo, Vol. 26 (4), 902-916
  • Deslauriers, M. (2022). Aristotle on sexual difference: Metaphysics, biology, politics. Oxford University Press.
  • Donker van Heel, K. (2016). Mrs Naunakhte & Family: The women of Ramesside Deir al-Medina. American University in Cairo Press.
  • Fantham, E., Foley, H. P., Kampen, N. B., & Pomeroy, S. B. (1994). Women in the classical world. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Fedi, S. (2016). Ruled by women: Gynocratic disorder in Aristotle's Sparta. Polity, Vol. 58 (1), 7-33.
  • Foucault, M. (1977). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In D. F. Bouchard (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice (pp. 139–164). New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Fraser, L.-G. (2011). A woman of consequence: Pandora in Hesiod's works and days. Cambridge Classical Journal, 57, 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccj.2011.09.010
  • Harry, C., & Polansky, R. (2016). Plato on women's natural ability: Revisiting Republic V and Timaeus 41e3-44d2 and 86b1-92c3. Apeiron, Vol. 49 (3), 261-280.
  • Hesiod. (2006). Theogony and Works and Days (G. W. Most, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
  • Homer. (1996). The Odyssey (R. Fagles, Trans.). Penguin.
  • Karbowski, J. (2014). Aristotle on the deliberative abilities of women. Apeiron, Vol. 47 (4), 435-460.
  • Kato, I. (2008). Demotic matrimonial property contracts recorded in the s'nh-documents: A re-examination of the term s'nh. Oriet, Vol. 43, 119-149.
  • Lavelle, B. M. (2019). The status of women in ancient Greece. Routledge.
  • Lefkowitz, M. R., & Fant, M. B. (2005). Women's life in Greece and Rome: A source book in translation (3rd Ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy. Oxford University Press.
  • Lohvynenko, I. A., & Lohvynenko, Y. S. (2023). Women in Ancient Egypt: Determination of legal status and peculiarities of marriage and family relations. Law and Safety, 89(2), 87-97. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.2.08
  • Matuszak, J. (2026). Women, Mesopotamian. Oxford Classical Dictionary. Oxford University Press.
  • Mayhew, R. (2004). The female in Aristotle's biology: Reason or rationalization. University of Chicago Press.
  • McAfee, N. (2021). Feminism in ancient philosophy. In The Oxford handbook of feminist philosophy, edited by K. Q. Hall and A. Garry. Oxford University Press.
  • McNeil, D. G. (1967). The code of Hammurabi. American Bar Association Journal, Vol. 53 (5), 444-446.
  • Nietzsche, F. (1994). On the genealogy of morality (C. Diethe, Trans.; K. Ansell-Pearson, Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Onayemi, F., & Adebowale, B. A. (2016). Courageous women in Greek and Nigerian drama: Antigone and Tẹ̀gọ̀nni. Nigeria and the Classics, Vol. 29, 62-77.
  • O'Pry, K. (2012). Social and political roles of women in Athens and Sparta. Saber and Scroll, Vol. 1(2), 7-14.
  • O'Reilly, K. R., & Pellò, C. (Eds.). (2023). Ancient women philosophers: Recovered ideas and new perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
  • Plato. (1997). Complete works (J. M. Cooper & D. S. Hutchinson, Eds.). Hackett.
  • Pomeroy, S. B. (1975). Goddesses, whores, wives, and slaves: Women in classical antiquity. Schocken.
  • Scott, J. W. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. American Historical Review, 91(5), 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahr.1986.10.017
  • Taylor, C. (2025). Women in the ancient Greek world: History and historiography. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 145, 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhes.2025.06.016
  • Urch, E. J. (1929). The law code of Hammurabi. American Bar Association Journal, Vol. 15 (7), 437-441.
  • VerSteeg, R. (2023). Ancient Egypt and laws relating to the status of women. Women & Criminal Justice, Vol. 33 (1) 1-13.
  • Vincent, G. E. (1904). The laws of Hammurabi. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 9 (6), 737-754.
  • Zoller, C. P. (2021). Plato and equality for women across social class. Journal of Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 15 (1), 35-62.