Published October 1, 2026 | Version v1

IPCRF v1.2 Public Historical Back-Test — Case Study 1: NYCT ADA Station Improvements, MTA Project 8356

  • 1. ROR icon Northeastern University

Contributors

Data curator:

Description

This technical case study presents a retrospective public-data historical back-test of the Integrated Project Controls and Risk Forecasting Framework (IPCRF), Version 1.2, using Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) records for the NYCT ADA Station Improvements at the 149 St–Grand Concourse Complex and Tremont Av (MTA Project 8356).
The analysis applies the frozen IPCRF Version 1.2 methodology to contemporaneous historical project records without modifying thresholds, weights, formulas, or action bands after the project outcome became known. The case focuses on the framework’s Finish Slippage indicator. On February 21, 2023, the published forecast completion date had moved 184 days beyond the original July 1, 2023 baseline completion date, producing a Finish Slippage value of 17.29% and a Critical IPCRF score of 100. This signal occurred 130 days before the original baseline completion date. Subsequent public records showed further deterioration, with an estimated completion date of June 30, 2026.


This case provides indicator-level historical evidence for the behavior of the frozen IPCRF schedule-warning logic on a real U.S. transit capital project. It does not establish full six-domain predictive validity, a complete Project Delivery Risk Score (PDRS), Forecast Confidence Score (FCS), calibrated false-positive or false-negative rates, or universal predictive accuracy because the public record does not contain all quantitative inputs required by the full IPCRF methodology.


The repository package includes the technical case-study report, reproducibility workbook, machine-readable analysis dataset, source-provenance register, and README documentation. Only publicly available records are used; unavailable variables are not inferred or fabricated. No MTA, transit-agency, or governmental participation, sponsorship, review, or endorsement is implied.

Files

Case 1 Report.pdf

Files (346.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b4fa2b7a519d1308f3394827230989a7
202.7 kB Preview Download
md5:9ec581e91f0b53dd4eba273e9dfa2a48
135.1 kB Download
md5:f0851ce97a652066b842f0ad1f1e3b06
2.0 kB Preview Download
md5:d01b749aaac0e8be8656e673be8e37f1
1.7 kB Preview Download
md5:a635c218dcb2c323d864c1256dff38be
4.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is derived from
Report: 10.5281/zenodo.23028918 (DOI)
Is part of
Report: 10.5281/zenodo.23089716 (DOI)

Dates

Issued
2026-10-01
DESCRIPTION

References

  • Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), MTA Capital Project Schedules: Beginning 2018; Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), MTA Capital Project Details: Beginning 2015; Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), Capital Program Oversight Committee Report, July 19, 2021; Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), Capital Program Committee Report, January 24, 2022; Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), Capital Program Committee Report, February 21, 2023; Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), Capital Program Committee Report, October 28, 2024.