Published September 30, 2026 | Version 1.0

The Enterprise Coherence Maturity Model (ECMM): A Five-Level Framework for Assessing and Developing Organisational Coherence

  • 1. Therapia Consult Ltd

Description

Organisations routinely measure financial, operational, and risk performance, yet they rarely assess how coherently their purpose, priorities, governance, behaviour, and operating model function together as one system. This paper introduces the Enterprise Coherence Maturity Model (ECMM), a framework that treats enterprise coherence as a dynamic, measurable system property. Drawing on the maturity-model tradition and organisational alignment research, the ECMM defines five maturity levels (Fragmented, Emerging, Operational, Integrated, and Coherence Intelligence) and assesses coherence across five dimensions: Strategy, Structure, Processes, Capabilities, and Behaviour. The model adds four stability indicators (entropy, propagation velocity, recovery pathways, and resilience), five coherence failure modes, and a coherence trajectory that captures whether coherence is strengthening or degrading independently of maturity level. An assessment methodology combining data collection, interviews, document review, and radar and heatmap scoring feeds a weighted Composite Coherence Score, in which behaviour carries the largest indicative weight as the proposed leading indicator of coherence. Four maturity-aligned transformation pathways (Stabilise, Align, Integrate, and Optimise) link assessment results to intervention sequencing. The paper discusses the model's contributions and limitations and sets out an agenda for calibrating and validating its indicative parameters.

Files

Files (497.3 kB)

Name Size
md5:7036d60a980bd6f524a2da5bfcc72806
497.3 kB Download

Additional details

Related works

Is supplemented by
Working paper: 10.5281/zenodo.23054540 (DOI)

Dates

Created
2026-09-30

References

  • Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., & Pöppelbuß, J. (2009). Developing maturity models for IT management. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(3), 213–222.
  • CMMI Product Team. (2010). CMMI for Development, Version 1.3 (CMU/SEI-2010-TR-033). Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
  • de Bruin, T., Freeze, R., Kulkarni, U., & Rosemann, M. (2005). Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model. ACIS 2005 Proceedings, 109.
  • Galbraith, J. R. (2002). Designing organizations: An executive guide to strategy, structure, and process (New and revised ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  • Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 4–16.
  • Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1980). A model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 9(2), 35–51.
  • Pöppelbuß, J., & Röglinger, M. (2011). What makes a useful maturity model? A framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management. ECIS 2011 Proceedings, 28.
  • Waterman, R. H., Peters, T. J., & Phillips, J. R. (1980). Structure is not organization. Business Horizons, 23(3), 14–26.