Published September 27, 2026
| Version v1
Conference paper
Open
Simulation-Based Optimization of Material Use and Personnel Safety in LPS Design
Authors/Creators
Description
External lightning protection systems (LPS) are commonly dimensioned according to standard-based rules that ensure robust protection, but do not quantify the trade-offs between interception, personnel safety, magnetic-field penetration, grounding performance, and material demand. This paper presents a consistent 3D simulation workflow for initial evaluating these aspects. A total of 720 mesh-cage configurations are investigated for three buildings of increasing size, covering lightning protection levels (LPLs) I–IV, one to three ring earth electrodes, five specific soil resistivities, and four frequencies representing different lightning current rise times. In addition, 60 single air-termination rod configurations (hereafter denoted as single-rod configurations) at LPL II, generated using a rolling-sphere algorithm and verified by a numerical protection envelope, are analyzed for comparison. The assessed quantities include grounding impedance, prospective touch and step voltages, magnetic-field penetration, conductor length, normalized material intensity, and a first-order estimate of embodied CO2. Normalized material demand decreases with building size and from LPL I to LPL IV, while additional ring electrodes reduce grounding impedance with diminishing returns. For the same earth-termination system (ETS), the single-rod concept requires approximately 30–40% less conductor than the mesh cage while providing equivalent rolling-sphere interception and comparable grounding performance. Prospective touch and step voltages are comparable for both concepts and are governed mainly by specific soil resistivity and building size. The single-rod concept generally produces higher magnetic-field magnitudes along the investigated injection-to-center path than the mesh cage, particularly at higher frequencies. These results indicate a trade-off between material reduction and magnetic-field penetration, while the implications for the EMC of installed equipment require further investigation.
Files
059_ICOLSE2026_Shulzhenko_ESG_LPS_v3b.pdf
Files
(871.8 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:683534a1753a090a4263fb24a4ec27e0
|
871.8 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Dates
- Accepted
-
2026-09-27
References
- S. Fauveaux and A. Lefort, "Copper based lightning protection: sustainability problems and proposed solutions," in Proc. Int. Conf. Lightning Static Electricity (ICOLSE), Campinas, Brazil, Sep. 2024.
- IEC 62305-3:2024, Protection against lightning – Part 3: Physical damage to structures and life hazard, 2024.
- E. Shulzhenko, K. Costa, and M. Rock, "Optimization approach for the earth-termination system of a large-scale solar power plant with a predetermined air-termination system," in Proc. Int. Conf. Lightning Static Electricity (ICOLSE), Campinas, Brazil, Sep. 2024.
- SINT Ingegneria, "XGSLab: electromagnetic simulation for power, grounding and lightning protection systems," [Online]. Available: http: //www.xgslab.com/. [Accessed: Apr. 2026].
- IEC 62305-1:2024, Protection against lightning – Part 1: General principles, 2024.
- S. Visacro, R. Alipio, M. H. Murta Vale, and C. Pereira, "The response of grounding electrodes to lightning currents: The effect of frequencydependent soil resistivity and permittivity," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 401–406, May 2011.
- E. Shulzhenko, "Blitzstromverteilung und Überspannungsschutz in Windenergieanlagen," Ph.D. dissertation, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany, 2020.
- E. Shulzhenko, K. Yamamoto, and M. Rock, "Modeling lightning current distribution in tower base of wind turbine," in Proc. 35th Int. Conf. Lightning Protection (ICLP) and XVI Int. Symp. Lightning Protection (SIPDA), 2021.
- T. Horchue, W. Tangtheerajaroonwong, S. Wojtas, and M. Woloszyk, "Impulse impedance measurements of lightning protection earthings," in Proc. IEEE PES GTD Grand Int. Conf. Expo. Asia (GTD Asia), Bangkok, Thailand, Mar. 2019, pp. 945–949.
- IEC 62305-2:2024, Protection against lightning – Part 2: Risk management, 2024.
- E. Shulzhenko and J. Birkl, "Evaluation of lightning current distribution in large-scale earth-termination systems," in Proc. Earthing Africa Symp. Exhib., Johannesburg, South Africa, 2017.
- L. Grcev, "Impulse efficiency of ground electrodes," IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 441–451, Jan. 2009.
- CENELEC EN 50522:2022, Earthing of power installations exceeding 1 kV a.c., 2022.
- M. Rock, E. Shulzhenko, K.-P. Müller, and R. Schüngel, "Mesh width of ground grids in shelters with small base areas for low step voltages at lightning currents," in Proc. 34th Int. Conf. Lightning Protection (ICLP), Rzeszów, Poland, Sep. 2018.
- IEC 62305-4:2024, Protection against lightning – Part 4: Electrical and electronic systems within structures, 2024.
- M. Röck, M. R. M. Saade, M. Balouktsi, F. N. Rasmussen, H. Birgisdottir, R. Frischknecht, G. Habert, T. Lützkendorf, and A. Passer, "Embodied GHG emissions of buildings – the hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation," Applied Energy, vol. 258, p. 114107, 2020.