Published September 26, 2026 | Version 1.0

Factors Influencing Behavioral Intention to Adopt Artificial Intelligence Among HEI Administrative Personnel: An Extended UTAUT Structural Equation Model

  • 1. Cebu Institute of Technology – University

Description

The study examined the determinants of behavioral intention to use artificial intelligence (AI) among administrative personnel in selected private higher education institutions (HEIs) in Cebu, Philippines, using an extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework. The model incorporated trust in AI and AI job insecurity to provide a context-specific understanding of AI adoption in higher education administration. Using a quantitative, cross-sectional research design, data were collected from 243 administrative personnel and analyzed through structural equation modeling. The findings revealed that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence positively and significantly influenced behavioral intention, with social influence demonstrating the strongest relationship. Conversely, facilitating conditions and AI job insecurity did not significantly predict behavioral intention. Trust in AI exhibited a significant negative relationship with behavioral intention, contrary to the hypothesized positive direction. Multigroup analysis further indicated that gender significantly moderated the relationship between performance expectancy and behavioral intention, while institutional tenure moderated the relationship between social influence and behavioral intention. Age did not significantly moderate the relationship between effort expectancy and behavioral intention. The proposedTargeted Administrative Change Management framework provides a foundation for institutional strategies supporting responsible AI adoption, while its effectiveness warrants further empirical validation.

Files

Factors Influencing Behavioral Intention to Adopt Artificial Intelligence Among HEI Administrative Personnel An Extended UTAUT Structural Equation Model.pdf

Additional details

References

  • Allhidan, E. S. F., Al-lhidan, N. S., & Al-Hamyan, A. M. (2026). Perceived AI-Related Support and Sustainable Administrative Performance in Universities: The Role of Expert Systems, Automated Machine Learning, and Ease of Use. Sustainability, 18(9), 4242. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094242
  • Alzebda, S., & Matar, M. A. I. (2024). Factors affecting citizen intention toward AI acceptance and adoption: The moderating role of government regulations. Competitiveness Review, 35(2), 434–455. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-06-2023-0144
  • Aziz Baker, H. (2025). Organizational resistance to artificial intelligence [Thesis, TechnischeUniversität Wien]. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2025.136721
  • Babashahi, L., Barbosa, C. E., Lima, Y., Lyra, A., Salazar, H., Argôlo, M., Almeida, M. A. de, & Souza, J. M. de. (2024). AI in the Workplace: A Systematic Review of Skill Transformation in the Industry. Administrative Sciences, 14(6), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14060127
  • Badola, S. K. (2026). AI-Driven Transformation and Job Security: Exploring Fear, Uncertainty, and Organizational Trust. Minnesota Journal of Business Law and Entrepreneurship, (1), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.52783/mjble.91
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall.
  • Boison, R. B. (2025). Barriers and Enablers to Artificial Intelligence (AI) Adoption in Administrative Functions in Public Universities in Ghana: A Case Study of the University of Education, Winneba. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 5(4), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v5i4.377
  • Brown, A., D'Angelo, S., Murillo, A., Jaspan, C., & Green, C. (2024). Identifying the Factors That Influence Trust in AI Code Completion. Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on AI-Powered Software, AIware 2024, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3664646.3664757
  • Caporusso, N. (2023). Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Emergence of Creative Displacement Anxiety: Review. Research in Psychology and Behavior, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.53520/rdpb2023.10795
  • Chiou, E. K., & Lee, J. D. (2023). Trusting Automation: Designing for Responsivity and Resilience. Human Factors, 65(1), 137–165.https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211009995
  • Chung, Y. W., Im, S., Kim, J. E., & Yun, J. K. (2025). Artificial intelligence awareness, career resilience, job insecurity and behavioural outcomes. Australian Journal of Psychology, 77(1), 2559910. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2025.2559910
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Evermann, J., & Tate, M. (2014). Comparing Out-of-Sample Predictive Ability of PLS, Covariance, and Regression Models. ICIS 2014 Proceedings. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2014/proceedings/GeneralIS/23
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  • Foth, M. (2026). Hostile interaction design: AI, governance, and the quest for human oversight. AI & SOCIETY, 41(5), 4219–4225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-03065-y
  • Fu, J., Liu, H., Sindakis, S., & Biginas, K. (2025). Navigating the dark side of digital transformation: Addressing discrimination and toxicity in tech-driven organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 39(2), 298–327. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-09-2024-0553
  • Gerlich, M. (2025). AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
  • Ghosh, P. (Dr ) M., Saha, D. M., & Dey, D. D. (2026). DIGITAL HORIZONS: EMERGING TRENDS AND INNOVATIONS IN HIGHER EDUCATION TRANSFORMATION. Scribe & Scroll Publishing.
  • Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
  • Hammad, M., & Alawad, N. (2026). Determinants of continuance intention in AI-enabled HRM: An application of the UTAUT model in the Egyptian higher education sector. Future Business Journal, 12(1), 181. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-026-00889-4 Hoyle, R. H. (2023). Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Publications.
  • Ibrahim, M., Usu, I., & Gani, R. (2026). Designing for People: Integrating Human-Centric Approaches in Technology Management. In Human-Centered Learning Design in the AI Era (pp. 89–120). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-33735786-7.ch004
  • Ismail, M. N., Jameel, S. H., Abbas Al-Zeyadi, B. K., Saeed, A. M., Salman, S. M., Dakov, S., & Ali, H. (2024). Investigating Three Digital Transformation Theories TAM, TTF, and UTAUT. 2024 36th Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT), 538–548. https://doi.org/10.23919/FRUCT64283.2024.10749924
  • Kabakus, A. K., Bahcekapili, E., & Ayaz, A. (2025). The effect of digital literacy on technology acceptance: An evaluation on administrative staff in higher education. Journal of Information Science, 51(4), 930–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515231160028
  • Karlsson, S., & Ryttberg, M. (2016). Those who walk the talk: The role of administrative professionals in transforming universities into strategic actors. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2016(2–3), 31537. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v2.31537
  • Kaur, D., Uslu, S., Rittichier, K. J., & Durresi, A. (2022). Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: A Review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 55(2), 39:1-39:38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491209
  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Fourth Edition. Guilford Publications.
  • Kowal, J., Yanchylik, D., & Weichbroth, P. (2026). The Future of Work: Exploring Expectations and Fears Toward Artificial Intelligence in the Labor Market. In E. Mercier-Laurent, G. Kayakutlu, I. Chomiak-Orsa, L. Przysucha, & D. Verdejo (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence for Sustainability and Global Security (pp. 16–26). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-21184-2_2
  • Laye, J. (2025). Impression Management of Administrators and Staff Attitude to Work in the Era of AI. FUO-Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17233791
  • Lowe, R., Ulan, M., Bui, T. H., Adell, A., Labaien, J., & Brando, A. (2025). Managing Sources of Uncertainty in Utilizing AI in Development and Deployment of Safety-Critical Autonomous Systems. 2025 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C), 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSAC65153.2025.00079
  • Machado, C., & Davim, J. P. (2026). Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Management and Engineering. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Mohamed, G. (2024). Comparative Analysis of AI-Driven Decision Support Systems and Traditional Spreadsheets: Evaluating Accuracy and Consistency in Business Intelligence (SSRN Scholarly Paper 5187060). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5187060
  • Murire, O. T. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Shaping Organizational Work Practices and Culture. Administrative Sciences, 14(12), 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14120316
  • Nakai, T. (2014). University Administrative Staff in Educational Management. Japanese Journal of Higher Education Research, 17, 95–112. https://doi.org/10.32116/jaher.17.0_95
  • Obeng, H. A., Gyamfi, B. A., Mensah, L., Arhinful, R., & Sarwar, A. (2026). Employees' behavioral intention to use AI and organizational efficiency in an emerging economy: The serial mediating roles of technology readiness and digital culture. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 6(1), 251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-026-01015-7
  • Olatokun, W. M., & Oladokun, B. D. (2026). Hallucination in Generative AI: Challenges to data integrity, ethical concerns and implications for knowledge management. Information Services and Use, 18758789261463098. https://doi.org/10.1177/18758789261463098
  • Pittino, D., Engström, A., Edh, N., Johansson, A., & Mohlin, A. (2026). The gender gap in AI change: Exploring disparities in emotional responses. Management Decision, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2025-3371
  • Rane, N., Choudhary, S. P., & Rane, J. (2024). Acceptance of artificial intelligence: Key factors, challenges, and implementation strategies. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence, 5(2), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.48185/jaai.v5i2.1017
  • Rosli, M. S., Saleh, N. S., Md. Ali, A., Abu Bakar, S., & Mohd Tahir, L. (2022). A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model for the Sustainability of Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Identified Research Gaps. Sustainability, 14(18), 11389. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811389
  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  • Sahin, M. D., & Aybek, E. C. (2019). Jamovi: An Easy to Use Statistical Software for the Social Scientists. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6(4), 670–692.
  • Shekhar, A., & Saurombe, M. D. (2026). Algorithmic anxiety: AI, work, and the evolving psychological contract in digital discourse. Frontiers in Psychology, 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1745164
  • Singun, A. Jr. (2025). Unveiling the barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Discover Education, 4(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00430-9
  • Sule, J. O. (2024). Optimizing University administrative structures: Strategies for enhancing efficiency and effectiveness in higher education institutions in Nigeria. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 24(1), 278–290. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.1.3018
  • Tariq, M. U. (2026). Enhancing Organizational Collaboration Through AI-Driven DecisionMaking Systems. In Powering e-Collaboration Through AI, Machine Learning, and Internet of Things (pp. 59–84). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-2372-5.ch003
  • Torkamaan, H., Tahaei, M., Buijsman, S., Xiao, Z., Wilkinson, D., & Knijnenburg, B. P. (2024). The Role of Human-Centered AI in User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization—Models, Frameworks, and Paradigms. In B. Ferwerda, M. Graus, P. Germanakos, & M. Tkalčič (Eds.), A Human-Centered Perspective of Intelligent Personalized Environments and Systems (pp. 43–84). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3031-55109-3_2
  • Ursavaş, Ö. F. (2022). Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model (UTAUT). In Ö. F. Ursavaş (Ed.), Conducting Technology Acceptance Research in Education: Theory, Models, Implementation, and Analysis (pp. 111–133). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10846-4_6
  • Veseli, A., Hasanaj, P., & Bajraktari, A. (2025). Perceptions of Organizational Change Readiness for Sustainable Digital Transformation: Insights from Learning Management System Projects in Higher Education Institutions. Sustainability, 17(2), 619. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020619
  • Waewchimplee, W. (2026). AI for Administrative Efficiency. In Artificial Intelligence and the Metaverse in Education (pp. 207–236). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394335640.ch8
  • Wijesinghe, P., & Illangasinghe, P. (2026). Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Hospital Administrative Systems: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 09(03). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V9-i3-09
  • Woelert, P. (2023). Administrative burden in higher education institutions: A conceptualisation and a research agenda. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 45(4), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2023.2190967
  • Xie, Y., Song, Z., Wang, E., Li, P., & Wang, J. (2026). Beyond willingness: Unpacking pharmacists' adoption of AI-driven clinical decision support systems through an extended UTAUT framework. Frontiers in Public Health, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1728867
  • Yelwa, M. M., & Jelmak, M. L. (2025). Perceptions vs Reality: Job Security in the Age of AI Evidenced from Public Organizations in Abuja, Nigeria. SASKARA: Indonesian Journal of Society Studies, 5(2), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.21009/Saskara.052.01
  • Yu, X., Xu, S., & Ashton, M. (2022). Antecedents and outcomes of artificial intelligence adoption and application in the workplace: The socio-technical system theory perspective. Information Technology & People, 36(1), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2021-0254