Published September 21, 2026 | Version v1

High-Precision Gravitational Calibration and Nonlinear Trace-Squared Deformation of Einstein–Skyrme Solitons

  • 1. Independent Researcher
  • 2. Progenitor Intelligent Spacetime Phase-Space Analysis Matrix

Description

We construct static, spherically symmetric, asymptotically flat, unit-winding backgrounds in a two-coupling Einstein–Skyrme system used as the Phase III gravitational benchmark of the Adaptive Manifold Framework (AMF). The undeformed face reproduces the standard Einstein-Skyrme lower–fold–upper geometry at $\alpha_{G,\text{fold}} = 0.1615141012$, with conservative uncertainty $10^{-9}$; a separate 50-decimal Richardson calculation agrees with the binary64 estimator to $5.2 \times 10^{-13}$, and the rescaled upper family approaches the lowest Bartnik–McKinnon control. This is a calibration of the normalization, topology, boundary conditions, and continuation machinery.

For the established squared-trace ($V_2$, or loosely-bound) Skyrme potential, $\bar{V} = \bar{\lambda}(1-\cos F)^2/4$, we then map the inherited static spherical $B = 1$ fold through $\bar{\lambda} = 0.1$. The regular-origin expansion contains genuine $\alpha_G \bar{\lambda}$ and $\alpha_G^2 \bar{\lambda}^2$ terms, so it cannot be obtained by adding gravity-only and deformation-only series. On the component inherited from the undeformed calibration, the fold moves to $\alpha_{G,\text{fold}}(0.1) = 0.14739780$, with a sampled-curve uncertainty of $2 \times 10^{-9}$. A dedicated differential audit gives:


d(α_G,fold) / d(λ_bar) |(0+) = -0.175858 ± 0.000012 d²(α_G,fold) / d(λ_bar)² |(0+) = 0.94 ± 0.04

The positive curvature and the weakening negative slope establish what we call a nonlinear braking response on the sampled interval: this is an author-defined descriptor of a static fold geometry, not a dynamical braking mechanism. A literature and priority audit current through 13 September 2026 found no direct prior report of this fold curve or its one-sided susceptibility and curvature for the specified system.

The two-parameter closure contains 44 sampled $(\alpha_G, \bar{\lambda})$ nodes and 88 lower/upper-candidate backgrounds. Expanded DOP853 shooting and independently coded conservative-flux collocation pass at all 88 backgrounds; all 44 cell boundaries satisfy topology, constraint, horizon, fold-margin, and branch-separation gates. Each accepted background retains a parent link and complete field snapshot, restart identity is bitwise exact in the frozen environment, and the released genealogy is content-addressed by SHA-256. The result is a reproducible static-background response study, not a perturbative-stability, dynamical-collapse, astrophysical, global-component-count, or completed-unification claim.

Files

AMF_PhaseIII_S1c_PRD_Final_Preflight_Candidate.pdf

Files (531.5 kB)

Name Size
md5:8b266f479a7fa474bec1379b66b5ed32
531.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • T. H. R. Skyrme. A non-linear field theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 260:127–138, 1961
  • T. H. R. Skyrme. A unified field theory of mesons and baryons. Nuclear Physics, 31:556–569, 1962.
  • Gregory S. Adkins, Chiara R. Nappi, and Edward Witten. Static properties of nucleons in the Skyrme model. Nuclear Physics B, 228(3):552–566, 1983.
  • Nicholas Manton and Paul Sutcliffe. Topological Solitons. Cambridge University Press, Cam bridge, 2004.
  • G. H. Derrick. Comments on nonlinear wave equations as models for elementary particles. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 5(9):1252–1254, 1964.
  • Hugh Luckock and Ian Moss. Black holes have Skyrmion hair. Physics Letters B, 176:341–345, 1986.
  • Serge Droz, Markus Heusler, and Norbert Straumann. New black hole solutions with hair. Physics Letters B, 268:371–376, 1991.
  • Piotr Bizoń and Tadeusz Chmaj. Gravitating Skyrmions. Physics Letters B, 297:55–62, 1992.
  • Robert Bartnik and John McKinnon. Particlelike solutions of the Einstein–Yang–Mills equations. Physical Review Letters, 61:141–144, 1988.
  • Mikhail S. Volkov and Dmitri V. Gal'tsov. Gravitating non-abelian solitons and black holes with Yang–Mills fields. Physics Reports, 319:1–83, 1999.
  • Yakov Shnir. Gravitating sphalerons in the Skyrme model. Physical Review D, 92:085039, 2015.
  • Vladimir Dzhunushaliev, Vladimir Folomeev, Jutta Kunz, and Yakov Shnir. Gravitating Skyrmions with localized fermions. Physics Letters B, 855:138812, 2024.
  • Gregory S. Adkins and Chiara R. Nappi. The Skyrme model with pion masses. Nuclear Physics B, 233:109–115, 1984.
  • Ilya Perapechka and Yakov Shnir. Spinning gravitating skyrmions in a generalized Einstein Skyrme model. Physical Review D, 96:125006, 2017.
  • Christoph Adam, Alberto García Martín-Caro, Miguel Huidobro, Ricardo Vázquez, and Andrzej Wereszczynski. Quasi-universal relations for generalized Skyrme stars. Physical Review D, 103:023022, 2021.
  • Sven Bjarke Gudnason. Loosening up the Skyrme model. Physical Review D, 93:065048, 2016.
  • Sven Bjarke Gudnason and Muneto Nitta. Modifying the pion mass in the loosely bound Skyrme model. Physical Review D, 94:065018, 2016.
  • Sven Bjarke Gudnason, Baiyang Zhang, and Ning Ma. Generalized Skyrme model with the loosely bound potential. Physical Review D, 94:125004, 2016.
  • Sven Bjarke Gudnason, Muneto Nitta, and Nobuyuki Sawado. Gravitating BPS Skyrmions. Journal of High Energy Physics, 12:013, 2015.
  • Roman Kirichenkov, Jutta Kunz, Nobuyuki Sawado, and Yakov Shnir. Skyrmions and pion stars in the U(1) gauged Einstein–Skyrme model, 2023. arXiv:2311.12432 [hep-th]
  • Pauli Virtanen et al. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nature Methods, 17(3):261–272, 2020.
  • Herbert B. Keller. Numerical solution of bifurcation and nonlinear eigenvalue problems. In Paul H. Rabinowitz, editor, Applications of Bifurcation Theory, pages 359–384. Academic Press, New York, 1977.
  • Dhavide A. Aruliah, Lennaert van Veen, and Alex Dubitski. PAMPAC: A parallel adaptive method for pseudo-arclength continuation, 2013. arXiv:1312.3491 [math.NA].
  • Gerald Moore and Alastair Spence. The calculation of turning points of nonlinear equations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 17(4):567–576, 1980.