Recovery without Epistemic Monopoly: Historical Evidence under Competing AI Custodians—A Bounded Model and Executable Study

TA-TR-2026-05. A bounded conceptual and executable study of historical evidence recovery when AI-mediated custodians may be untrusted or in conflict. English full text and complete Chinese translation describe one study.

Methods and limits. The deposit includes deterministic finite-state studies and reproducibility material. It does not report real autonomous-agent attack rates, production penetration testing, or a demonstrated defense against superintelligence. A conventional pinned-reference baseline ties the proposed scoped reporting layer on byte recovery; the negative result is retained.

Contribution and responsibility. Hongju Liu initiated the motivating concern, selected the civilizational relevance and authorized this publication. GPT-6 Astra Pro substantially performed literature synthesis, conceptual development, implementation, execution analysis, bilingual drafting and file preparation. Not peer reviewed; no separate final human line-by-line verification is claimed. No OpenAI, Harvard, Zenodo or institutional endorsement is implied.

Rights. CC BY 4.0 applies to newly written text and supporting code to the extent rights are held. Referenced third-party materials retain their own rights.

Editorial supplement, 19 September 2026. Critical Use of the Six Trinity Accord Studies provides dated bilingual reading notes, contribution boundaries, counterreadings and source access. It supplements this paper without replacing its files, changing its version, supplying independent corroboration, or becoming a seventh research paper. This link was added after the original publication; the original publication date and earlier timestamp proofs do not cover the new supplement.