Load Monitoring With Consumer Wearables in Amateur Endurance Athletes: Signal, Noise and Behaviour Change
Description
Consumer wearable devices are now used routinely by amateur endurance athletes to estimate training
load through step counts, heart rate, energy expenditure, and GPS-derived pace and distance, yet
validation studies consistently find measurement error that varies substantially by metric, device, and
exercise intensity, with wrist-worn optical heart-rate accuracy in particular degrading markedly during
high-intensity effort. A separate and distinct evidence base addresses whether wearable feedback actually
changes training behaviour, generally finding a modest short-term increase in physical activity that
attenuates over months of continued use. This review synthesises the device-validation and
behaviour-change literature relevant to consumer wearable load monitoring in amateur endurance
athletes, distinguishing genuine physiological signal from measurement noise and situating both within
the separate question of whether wearable data sustainably changes training behaviour.
Files
JSMPM_V5_2024_006_LoadMonitoringConsumerWearablesAmateurEndurance.pdf
Additional details
Identifiers
- ISSN
- 2766-9599
Related works
- Is documented by
- Journal article: 2766-9599 (ISSN)
Dates
- Accepted
-
2024-06-06
Software
References
- Duking P, Hotho A, Holmberg HC, Fuss FK, Sperlich B. "Comparison of non-invasive individual monitoring of the training and health of athletes with commercially available wearable technologies". Front Physiol 7(2016):71. 2. Halson SL. "Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes". Sports Med 44(2014):S139-S147. 3. Bourdon PC, Cardinale M, Murray A, et al. "Monitoring athlete training loads: consensus statement". Int J Sports Physiol Perform 12(2017):S2161-S2170. 4. Gabbett TJ. "The training-injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder?". Br J Sports Med 50(2016):273-280. 5. Fuller D, Colwell E, Low J, et al. "Reliability and validity of commercially available wearable devices for measuring steps, energy expenditure, and heart rate: systematic review". JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8(2020):e18694. 6. Evenson KR, Goto MM, Furberg RD. "Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers". Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 12(2015):159. 7. Peake JM, Kerr G, Sullivan JP. "A critical review of consumer wearables, mobile applications, and equipment for