Published September 2, 2026
| Version v1
Journal article
Open
Deepfakes, Electoral Integrity, and Constitutional Democracy: Rethinking Freedom of Expression in the Digital Era
Description
Preservation copy of an article published in International Journal of Law, Politics and Governance. Read the full article: https://ioro.org/ijlpg/article/875488491920/875488491920.
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence has enabled the creation and dissemination of highly realistic deepfake content, creating significant challenges for electoral integrity and constitutional democracy. This paper critically examines the impact of deepfakes on democratic elections, with particular emphasis on the constitutional tension between safeguarding electoral processes and protecting freedom of expression. Adopting a qualitative, interpretivist and inductive approach, the research relies on secondary data comprising academic literature, legislation, judicial decisions, governmental reports and policy documents, analysed through thematic analysis. The paper finds that deepfakes can facilitate political misinformation, voter manipulation, identity impersonation and declining public trust, while existing legal frameworks remain insufficiently specific to address election-related synthetic media. A comparative assessment of India, the European Union, the United Kingdom and the United States demonstrates significant differences in legislative clarity, platform accountability and election-specific regulation. The research further establishes that excessive regulation may suppress legitimate political expression, whereas inadequate regulation may undermine informed democratic participation. It therefore advocates a proportionate constitutional approach based on clear and dedicated deepfake election legislation, stronger platform accountability and transparency, technological detection, digital literacy, judicial oversight and international regulatory cooperation. Such measures can strengthen electoral integrity while preserving the fundamental democratic value of freedom of expression in the digital era.
Notes
© 2026 The Author(s). Published by IORO Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited, a link to the license is provided, and any changes are indicated.
Files
875488491920.pdf
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.64823/ijlpg.2601010
- ISSN
- 3143-7028
Related works
- Is identical to
- https://ioro.org/ijlpg/article/875488491920/875488491920 (URL)
References
- Aagaard, P., & Marthedal, S. (2023). Political microtargeting: Towards a pragmatic approach. Internet Policy Review, 12(1), 1-22. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/271329.
- Ali, M., Sapiezynski, P., Korolova, A., Mislove, A., & Rieke, A. (2021, March). Ad delivery algorithms: The hidden arbiters of political messaging. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on web search and data mining (pp. 13-21). https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3437963.3441801
- Basol, M., Roozenbeek, J., Berriche, M., Uenal, F., McClanahan, W. P., & Linden, S. V. D. (2021). Towards psychological herd immunity: Cross-cultural evidence for two prebunking interventions against COVID-19 misinformation. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 20539517211013868. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/20539517211013868
- Bassini, M. (2025). Speech without a speaker: Constitutional coverage for generative AI output?. European Constitutional Law Review, 21(3), 375-411. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-constitutional-law-review/article/speech-without-a-speaker-constitutional-coverage-for-generative-ai-output/68F18876ED0C4C34B0D301ADE52CD821
- Brashier, N. M., Pennycook, G., Berinsky, A. J., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Timing matters when correcting fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(5), e2020043118. https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2020043118
- Cavaliere, P. (2024). Freedom of expression after disinformation: Towards a new paradigm for the right to receive information. Journal of Media Law, 16(1), 28-37. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17577632.2024.2362482
- Chawki, M. (2025). AI moderation and legal frameworks in child-centric social media: a case study of Roblox. Laws, 14(3), 29. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/14/3/29
- Chen, Z., Ye, J., Tsai, B., Ferrara, E., & Luceri, L. (2025, September). Synthetic politics: Prevalence, spreaders, and emotional reception of AI-generated political images on X. In Proceedings of the 36th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (pp. 11-21). https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3720553.3746675
- Chung, M., & Kim, N. (2021). When I learn the news is false: How fact-checking information stems the spread of fake news via third-person perception. Human Communication Research, 47(1), 1-24. https://academic.oup.com/hcr/article-abstract/47/1/1/5917727
- Cotter, K., Medeiros, M., Pak, C., & Thorson, K. (2021). "Reach the right people": The politics of "interests" in Facebook's classification system for ad targeting. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 2053951721996046. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2053951721996046
- Dame Adjin-Tettey, T. (2022). Combating fake news, disinformation, and misinformation: Experimental evidence for media literacy education. Cogent arts & humanities, 9(1), 2037229. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23311983.2022.2037229
- De Gregorio, G., & Pollicino, O. (2025). The European constitutional way to address disinformation in the age of artificial intelligence. German Law Journal, 26(3), 449-470. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/german-law-journal/article/european-constitutional-way-to-address-disinformation-in-the-age-of-artificial-intelligence/548C4C0592757ADC0D250EF8C4C3D434
- Douek, E. (2021). The limits of international law in content moderation. UC Irvine J. Int'l Transnat'l & Comp. L., 6, 37. https://access.heinonline.com/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/ucivjtoml6§ion=6
- Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., ... & Amazeen, M. A. (2022). The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nature reviews psychology, 1(1), 13-29. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-021-00006-y
- Ecker, U. K., O'Reilly, Z., Reid, J. S., & Chang, E. P. (2020). The effectiveness of short‐format refutational fact‐checks. British journal of psychology, 111(1), 36-54. https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjop.12383
- Ferrara, E. (2024). Charting the landscape of nefarious uses of generative artificial intelligence for online election interference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.01862. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01862
- Gillespie, T. (2022). Do not recommend? Reduction as a form of content moderation. Social Media+ Society, 8(3), 20563051221117552. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/20563051221117552
- Gonçalves, J., Weber, I., Masullo, G. M., Torres da Silva, M., & Hofhuis, J. (2023). Common sense or censorship: How algorithmic moderators and message type influence perceptions of online content deletion. new media & society, 25(10), 2595-2617. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/14614448211032310
- Guay, B., Berinsky, A. J., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. (2023). How to think about whether misinformation interventions work. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(8), 1231-1233. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01667-w
- Guerrero-Sierra, H. F., Palacio Puerta, M., & Garavito Rincón, D. F. (2025). Threats and regulatory challenges of non-consensual pornographic deepfakes: an analysis of the colombian case. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1), 2552342. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23311886.2025.2552342
- Haenschen, K. (2023). The conditional effects of microtargeted facebook advertisements on voter turnout. Political Behavior, 45(4), 1661-1681. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11109-022-09781-7
- Haimson, O. L., Delmonaco, D., Nie, P., & Wegner, A. (2021). Disproportionate removals and differing content moderation experiences for conservative, transgender, and black social media users: Marginalization and moderation gray areas. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1-35. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3479610
- Heseltine, M., & Clemm von Hohenberg, B. (2024). Large language models as a substitute for human experts in annotating political text. Research & Politics, 11(1), 20531680241236239. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/20531680241236239
- Kruikemeier, S., Schäfer, S., Hamilton, A., Guldemond, P., Vrielink, J., Dymanus, C., ... & Boerman, S. C. (2026). AI meets politics: Examining the effects of different targeting strategies across 15 countries. New Media & Society, 28(7), 2932-2960. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/14614448261445063
- Lavigne, M. (2021). Strengthening ties: The influence of microtargeting on partisan attitudes and the vote. Party Politics, 27(5), 965-976. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1354068820918387
- Lee, D. K. L., & Ramazan, O. (2021). Fact-checking of health information: The effect of media literacy, metacognition and health information exposure. Journal of Health Communication, 26(7), 491-500. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10810730.2021.1955312
- Lee, S., Xiong, A., Seo, H., & Lee, D. (2023). "Fact-checking" fact checkers: A data-driven approach. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/fact-checking-fact-checkers-a-data-driven-approach/
- Lewandowsky, S., & Pomerantsev, P. (2022). Technology and democracy: A paradox wrapped in a contradiction inside an irony. Memory, mind & media, 1, e5. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/memory-mind-and-media/article/technology-and-democracy-a-paradox-wrapped-in-a-contradiction-inside-an-irony/F904B05B7ECCC05A844E8E4EA7F86DC0
- Lewandowsky, S., & Van Der Linden, S. (2021). Countering misinformation and fake news through inoculation and prebunking. European review of social psychology, 32(2), 348-384. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10463283.2021.1876983
- Minici, M., Luceri, L., Cinus, F., & Ferrara, E. (2024). Uncovering coordinated cross-platform information operations threatening the integrity of the 2024 US presidential election online discussion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.15402. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15402
- Nguyen, D., Astrid, M., Kacem, A., Ghorbel, E., & Aouada, D. (2025, October). Vulnerability-aware spatio-temporal learning for generalizable deepfake video detection. In 2025 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (pp. 10786-10796). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/11445285/
- Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, Q. V. H., Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, D. T., Huynh-The, T., Nahavandi, S., ... & Nguyen, C. M. (2022). Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 223, 103525. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077314222001114
- Nyhan, B., Porter, E., Reifler, J., & Wood, T. J. (2020). Taking fact-checks literally but not seriously? The effects of journalistic fact-checking on factual beliefs and candidate favorability. Political behavior, 42(3), 939-960. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11109-019-09528-x
- Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in cognitive sciences, 25(5), 388-402. https://www.cell.com/trends/cognitivesciences/fulltext/S1364-6613(21)00051-6
- Porter, E., & Wood, T. J. (2021). The global effectiveness of fact-checking: Evidence from simultaneous experiments in Argentina, Nigeria, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(37), e2104235118. https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2104235118
- Radesky, J., Bridgewater, E., Black, S., O'Neil, A., Sun, Y., Schaller, A., ... & Campbell, S. W. (2024). Algorithmic content recommendations on a video-sharing platform used by children. JAMA Network Open, 7(5), e2413855. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/article-abstract/2819134
- Rana, M. S., Nobi, M. N., Murali, B., & Sung, A. H. (2022). Deepfake detection: A systematic literature review. IEEE access, 10, 25494-25513. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9721302/
- Roozenbeek, J., Maertens, R., McClanahan, W., & Van Der Linden, S. (2021). Disentangling item and testing effects in inoculation research on online misinformation: Solomon revisited. Educational and psychological measurement, 81(2), 340-362. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0013164420940378
- Simchon, A., Edwards, M., Lewandowsky, S., & Ognyanova, K. (2024). The persuasive effects of political microtargeting in the age of generative artificial intelligence. PNAS nexus, 3(2), pgae035. https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae035
- Umbach, R., Henry, N., Beard, G. F., & Berryessa, C. M. (2024, May). Non-consensual synthetic intimate imagery: Prevalence, attitudes, and knowledge in 10 countries. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-20). https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3613904.3642382
- Walter, N., Cohen, J., Holbert, R. L., & Morag, Y. (2020). Fact-checking: A meta-analysis of what works and for whom. Political communication, 37(3), 350-375. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10584609.2019.1668894
Subjects
- Social Sciences & Humanities
- https://ioro.org/subjects/social-sciences-humanities