There is a newer version of the record available.

Published August 25, 2026 | Version v18

Quantum Feed-Forward Diverter Loop

Authors/Creators

Description

This scientific proposal outlines a unique thought experiment combining ultra-cold Rubidium atomic clouds in a negative time dwell state with quantum entanglement triggers. The framework utilizes a quantum feed-forward mechanism to route incoming photon light pulses onto an alternate path, effectively presenting a theoretical layout to bypass temporal grandfather paradoxes without inducing a system-wide wavefunction collapse.

"Update (Version 2): Added Python (Qiskit) simulation script to verify quantum state routing logic."

Implemented a 4-Case Marginal Probability Matrix simulation (Z-basis, X-basis, No-measurement, and Random-basis) to rigorously verify that the system strictly obeys the No-Signaling Theorem and preserves causality under feed-forward routing conditions.

Update (Version 4): Integrated an advanced Time-Symmetric / Post-Selected Diverter Test framework. Successfully verified a 100% quantum state correlation conditioned on future measurement outcomes while strictly preserving the global No-Signaling theorem constraint.

Version 5 Update — Temporal Wavepacket and Effective Negative Group-Delay Model

This version extends the Quantum Feed-Forward Diverter Loop thought experiment by introducing a temporal wavepacket model for the photon and an effective frequency-domain transfer function representing positive and negative group delays.

The photon is modeled as a Gaussian temporal wavepacket. Two alternative pathways are assigned effective delays, with Path-1 represented by a positive delay and Path-2 by an effective negative group delay. The resulting temporal wavepackets are numerically propagated and compared to visualize the corresponding temporal shifts.

The quantum-routing component is then combined with an entangled A–B pair, photon–B interaction, and A-controlled quantum path diversion. The simulation evaluates both the unconditional photon-path distribution and the post-selected correlation between the earlier photon path and the later B measurement outcome.

Using 20,000 simulated shots, the unconditional path probabilities were approximately:

P(Path=0) = 0.5000
P(Path=1) = 0.5000

Post-selection produced perfect conditional correlations in this circuit model:

P(Path=0 | B=0) = 1.0000
P(Path=1 | B=1) = 1.0000

These results demonstrate temporal-wavepacket shifting and strong conditional quantum correlation within the computational model. The effective negative group delay is used as a mathematical transfer-function parameter and is not interpreted as literal backward propagation of a photon or proof of retrocausality.

This version is intended as a theoretical/computational extension of the proposed Quantum Feed-Forward Diverter Loop and does not constitute an experimental demonstration of negative time, retrocausal signalling, or violation of the quantum no-signalling principle.

Version 6 Update — Coupled Temporal–Quantum Counterfactual Test
This version extends the Quantum Feed-Forward Diverter Loop by coupling the temporal wavepacket framework with the quantum A–B diverter model and introducing an explicit future-measurement-choice test.
The photon is represented as a temporal wavepacket, while the two quantum paths are associated with different effective transfer functions. Path-1 is assigned an effective negative group delay. The quantum model includes A–B entanglement, photon–B interaction, and A-controlled path diversion.
The model tests whether changing the future measurement basis of particle B can alter the earlier photon-path marginal distribution without classical communication. Four future measurement conditions were compared: Z basis, X basis, Random basis, and No measurement.
Using 20,000 simulated shots, the earlier-path probabilities were approximately:
P(Earlier Path=0):
Z basis = 0.4992
X basis = 0.4979
Random basis = 0.4979
No measurement = 0.5013
P(Earlier Path=1):
Z basis = 0.5008
X basis = 0.5021
Random basis = 0.5021
No measurement = 0.4986
The results show that the earlier photon-path marginal remains approximately 50:50 across the different future measurement choices. No controllable change in the earlier marginal distribution was observed in this computational model.
Conditional correlations between the photon path and the later B outcome remain present, demonstrating the distinction between quantum correlation and usable retrocausal signalling.
This version therefore provides a counterfactual/no-signalling test of the proposed mechanism. It does not demonstrate literal backward time, retrocausal communication, or a violation of the quantum no-signalling principle.
Important: The negative group delay remains an effective temporal transfer-function parameter and should not be interpreted as literal backward propagation of the photon.
 
Version 7 A coupled computational model combining temporal wavepacket shifts with quantum path control and future-conditioned A–B correlations was implemented. The earlier-path marginal remained approximately 50:50 in the tested configuration, while perfect conditional Path–B correlations were observed.
 
Version 8 Update — Future-Choice / Retrocausal Marginal Test
This version extends the Quantum Feed-Forward Diverter Loop computational model by testing whether an independently selected future measurement basis of qubit B can statistically alter the earlier photon-path marginal distribution.
The model retains the joint temporal-wavepacket and quantum-path framework introduced in Version 7, including:
Path-0 coupled to a positive-delay temporal wavepacket.
Path-1 coupled to an effective negative-delay temporal wavepacket.
Quantum A–B correlations and photon–B interaction.
Earlier photon-path measurement performed before the future B measurement.
Independent variation of the future B measurement choice.
Four future-choice conditions were compared: Z basis, X basis, no measurement, and random basis.
For the principal Z-versus-X comparison, the simulated results were:
P(Path=0 | future B=Z) = 0.498150
P(Path=0 | future B=X) = 0.499450
Difference = −0.001300
Z-score = −0.260001
Two-sided p-value = 0.794863
No statistically significant difference was detected between the earlier-path marginal distributions under the tested future measurement choices.
The simulation therefore provides no evidence of controllable retrocausal signalling within this computational model. Conditional correlations between the earlier path and later B outcomes may still occur, but these correlations do not by themselves demonstrate that a future measurement choice can be used to control an earlier observable.
Important limitation: the negative delay used in this model represents an effective mathematical temporal-transfer-function shift. It does not represent literal backward propagation of a photon in time.
This Version 8 should therefore be interpreted as a computational test of the no-signalling/retrocausal hypothesis, not as an experimental demonstration of backward time propagation or retrocausal communication.
Version 9 - Robustness Test
Version 10- Coupled mathematical model
Version 11 Coupled Temporal Path Quantum Model & Projective Future Measurement Test
Version 13- Mathematical Model Showing no-signalling invariance under the tested future measurement channels
Version 14/15 Computetionl test of the proposed retrocausal/causal hypothesis no controllable retrocausal signalling detected

V16

Full Feed-Forward Mechanism Prototype
Computational prototype of the proposed B → A → Diverter → Photon Path mechanism, including path-dependent positive/negative effective temporal shifts and correlation analysis.

V17

Quantum B–A–Diverter–Photon Path Model
Bell-state quantum model connecting A–B entanglement, A-controlled photon diversion, Path correlations, and future B measurement, with a no-signalling test.

V18

Future B Event: Conditional Correlation vs No-Signalling
Tests whether later B measurement outcomes correlate with the earlier Path while checking whether the unconditional earlier Path marginal remains unchanged.

Version 19 — Explicit Causal Ordering:
Introduced density-matrix tracking, trace-distance, and mutual-information tests. Results confirmed zero accessible information about future random measurement choices in earlier path records, supporting no-signalling and causal ordering within the computational model.

Version 20 — Unified Quantum–Temporal Computational Model:
Integrated Bell-state entanglement, controlled photon diversion, and path-dependent temporal wavepackets with effective positive/negative temporal shifts. The framework enables both future-conditioned correlations and non-selective analysis, while preserving the no-signalling constraint.

Version 21 — Causality & No-Signalling Test

This version computationally tests causal influence in the Quantum Feed-Forward Diverter Loop using entanglement, controlled photon diversion, temporal wavepackets, and effective negative time shifts.

The results distinguish quantum correlation from controllable retrocausal signalling.

The negative temporal shift remains a mathematical model, not literal backward time propagation.

No physical retrocausality or violation of the No-Signalling Theorem is demonstrated.

Version 22

Figure 1 — Path-dependent Temporal Wavepackets

Shows two path-dependent temporal wavepackets with different effective temporal shifts. Path-0 is centered at zero, while Path-1 is shifted to an earlier effective time coordinate.

Figure 2 — Conditional vs Non-selective Temporal Distribution

Compares the temporal distributions conditioned on B=0/Path-0 and B=1/Path-1 with their non-selective average, illustrating conditional temporal correlations without implying physical backward-time propagation.

 

Version 23 presents a computational no-signaling and causality test for the Quantum Feed-Forward Diverter Loop. The model compares unconditional B statistics and non-selective temporal distributions under different A settings. The results show no observable signaling, while conditional correlations remain present. The effective temporal shifts are mathematical model parameters and do not demonstrate physical retrocausality or backward-time propagation.
 
Version 24 presents a robustness and parameter-scan test of the proposed quantum-temporal model. Across 54 combinations of effective temporal shifts and wavepacket widths, the simulated B statistics and non-selective temporal statistics remained invariant. No observable retrocausal signaling was detected within the tested model.
 
V25 extends the quantum-temporal model by introducing finite sampling, detector timing jitter, and measurement noise. The simulations show that apparent differences decrease as the number of events increases, consistent with statistical fluctuations rather than controllable retrocausal signaling.
 

 

Files

New Version Quantum_Code V5.txt

Files (964.7 kB)

Name Size
md5:4dd13ddbf0d28e4c41b0aa5bf2e34da2
8.1 kB Preview Download
md5:e881b5c3fcf6850c2eb2de8788dc5233
2.5 kB Preview Download
md5:6b2bdf895b171777ad1514b31c57e6c0
757 Bytes Preview Download
md5:f7cdd1d7f6a1cec00e5dd5ac49b7bd5a
4.2 kB Preview Download
md5:110a9e0b5fed023f57433f171bc1b31d
2.9 kB Preview Download
md5:18345071650b8f65b6c3fae072a9dd11
18.2 kB Preview Download
md5:de5626a0cdbcb6a15393e86d2e221582
14.5 kB Preview Download
md5:6339954e1bc0dc7629200e3616a59722
16.4 kB Preview Download
md5:7f4d2d9a3953211320a649a192e79a4e
12.4 kB Preview Download
md5:bf748ce5b0bd5a7298391b75d1b08e9a
13.5 kB Preview Download
md5:25c31a8363e3efb6e2d0b510656879b8
10.1 kB Preview Download
md5:c1dba901885879e0fc426dd80b56eaa3
12.1 kB Preview Download
md5:1853453b2225d3807f8edd17679c6966
13.7 kB Preview Download
md5:949e4ee82102e5cb681147d0187dcf2e
12.7 kB Preview Download
md5:052a1522f2ac3e3b4b90af2ef6dcf330
14.8 kB Preview Download
md5:cd5e502f6ba6723cc5ff591e30616fac
16.1 kB Preview Download
md5:2542ac2d97b94ae7988543befe347c33
140.5 kB Preview Download
md5:8ead57a1162d4c1b4cdd5f70611320ab
124.2 kB Preview Download
md5:f4278907356dd8e5b11dda49bf378fa5
10.3 kB Preview Download
md5:905b657bf33418058516879e31bd53bf
10.4 kB Preview Download
md5:b8514cc18f458fefd4312d4a158f5e8f
8.6 kB Preview Download
md5:fdcbfbe2a3cf930b3afe28776d98a889
15.8 kB Preview Download
md5:67972394d2b702984521c341047f31b6
69.7 kB Preview Download
md5:05322ab9d4673f786b7a5fe568546654
135.5 kB Preview Download
md5:bea858f5afef9ee98452d21b2228da2a
114.4 kB Preview Download
md5:b43611717a54cbd560af8aead236b499
162.3 kB Preview Download