Published August 30, 2026 | Version CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0

Restoring Worker Subjectivity: Rethinking Dehumanization and the Crisis of HR

  • 1. Falicus Group, Milan, Italy.

Contributors

Contact person:

Researcher:

  • 1. Falicus Group, Milan, Italy.

Description

Abstract: Organizational dehumanization and the growing fragmentation of the human resource (HR) function have been associated with employee stress, turnover, and declining organizational effectiveness. Although these issues have been widely discussed, they are rarely examined within a unified theoretical perspective. This perspective paper aims to conceptually integrate these two organizational phenomena and examine how the recognition of worker subjectivity may contribute to improving employee well-being and organizational performance. The paper argues that neglecting worker subjectivity undermines motivation, psychological resources, and the alignment between individual and organizational needs. It proposes that dehumanization and HR fragmentation are interconnected processes that reinforce one another. The paper discusses how recognizing worker subjectivity can inform HR practices, organizational design, and leadership approaches aimed at fostering sustainable performance, participation, and employee well-being. Future directions include the development of subjectivity-oriented organizational interventions. By integrating organizational dehumanization and HR fragmentation within a common theoretical framework, this paper offers a novel perspective that identifies worker subjectivity as a strategic lever for organizational development and provides a conceptual foundation for future research and management practice.

Files

L189212120826.pdf

Files (447.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:c7531975b95e2297f96f6dc3d007804b
447.2 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.35940/ijmh.L1892.12120826
EISSN
2394-0913

Dates

Accepted
2026-08-15
Manuscript received on 20 July 2026 | First Revised Manuscript received on 27 July 2026 | Second Revised Manuscript received on 04 August 2026 | Manuscript Accepted on 15 August 2026 | Manuscript published on 30 August 2026.

References

  • Yan, T., Ji, F., Bi, M., Wang, H., Cui, X., Liu, B., ... & Ding, X. (2022). Occupational stress and associated risk factors among 13,867 industrial workers in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 945902. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.945902
  • Kachi, Y., Inoue, A., Eguchi, H., et al. (2020). Occupational stress and the risk of turnover: A large prospective cohort study of employees in Japan. BMC Public Health, 20, 174. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-8289-5
  • Fosu, A. (2025). Employee turnover and organizational performance. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 13, 156–169. DOI: 10.4236/jss.2025.1312012
  • Subramanian, K. G., & Mathew, L. (2025). Navigating employee retention challenges: Perspectives from HR professionals. International Journal of Novel Research and Development, 10(4), a164–a175. URL: https://ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2504020.pdf
  • Christof, K. (2014). Dehumanization in organizational settings: Some scientific and ethical considerations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 748. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00748. Works remain significant; see the declaration
  • Vveinhardt, J. (2025). Employee objectification in modern organizations: Who has swept personal dignity under the carpet? Administrative Sciences, 15(11), 447. DOI: 10.3390/admsci15110447
  • Caesens, G., & Stinglhamber, F. (2019). The relationship between organizational dehumanization and outcomes: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 61(9), 699–703. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001638
  • Stinglhamber, F., Ohana, M., & Demoulin, S. (2025). Backfire effect of organizational pressure to behave unethically: The roles of organizational dehumanization and moral attentiveness. Journal of Business Research, 200, 115642. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115642
  • Belmi, P., & Schroeder, J. (2021). Human "resources"? Objectification at work. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(2), 384–417. DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000254
  • Nguyen, N., Besson, T., & Stinglhamber, F. (2022). Emotional labour: The role of organizational dehumanization. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 27(2), 179–194. DOI: 10.1037/ocp0000289
  • Valtorta, R. R., & Monaci, M. G. (2023). When workers feel like objects: A field study on self-objectification and affective organizational commitment. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 19(1), 15–26. DOI: 10.5964/ejop.5549
  • Lagios, C., Restubog, S. L. D., García, P. R. J. M., He, Y., & Caesens, G. (2023). A trickle-out model of organizational dehumanization and displaced aggression. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 141, 103826. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103826
  • Brison, N., & Caesens, G. (2023). The relationship between workplace ostracism and organizational dehumanization: The role of need to belong and its outcomes. Psychologica Belgica, 63(1), 120–137. DOI: 10.5334/pb.1215
  • Sainz, M., Delgado, N., & Moriano, J. A. (2021). The link between authentic leadership, organizational dehumanization and stress at work. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 37(2), 85–92. DOI: 10.5093/JWOP2021A9
  • Haider, A., Fatima, T., & Zia, M. (2024). Organizational Dehumanization and Job Anxiety: Moderating Role of Passion: A Conservation of Resource Theory Perspective. Journal of Innovative Research in Management Sciences, 5(2), 1–21. DOI: 10.62270/jirms.v5i2.71
  • Wu, S. J., & Paluck, E. L. (2025). Having a voice in your group: Increasing productivity through group participation. Behavioural Public Policy, 9(1), 192–211. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2022.9
  • Newman, A., Ferrer, J., Andresen, M., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Human resource management in times of crisis: what have we learnt from the recent pandemic? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(15), 2857–2875. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2023.2229100
  • Negt, P., & Haunschild, A. (2025). Exploring the gap between research and practice in human resource management (HRM): a scoping review and agenda for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 75(1), 837–879. DOI: 10.1007/s11301-023-00397-7
  • Bos-Nehles, A. C., & Meijerink, J. G. (2018). HRM implementation by multiple HRM actors: a social exchange perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(22), 3068–3092. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2018.1443958
  • Bondarouk, T., Harms, R., & Lepak, D. (2017). Does e-HRM lead to better HRM service? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(9), 1332–1362. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2015.1118139
  • Mitrofanova, E. A., Konovalova, V. G., & Mitrofanova, A. E. (2019). Opportunities, problems and limitations of digital transformation of HR management. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 57, 1717–1727. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2019.03.174
  • Linehan, C., & O'Brien, E. (2017). From Tell-Tale Signs to Irreconcilable Struggles: The Value of Emotion in Exploring the Ethical Dilemmas of Human Resource Professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(4), 763–777.DOI: 10.1007/s10551-016-3040-y
  • O'Brien, E., & Linehan, C. (2018). The last taboo? Surfacing and supporting Emotional Labour in HR work. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(4), 683–709. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2016.1184178
  • Paulet, R., Holland, P., & Bratton, A. (2021). Employee voice: the missing factor in sustainable HRM? Sustainability, 13(17). DOI: 10.3390/su13179732
  • Joseph, S., & Shetty, N. (2022). An empirical study on the impact of employee voice and silence on destructive leadership and organizational culture. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 85–109. DOI: 10.1007/s13520-022-00155-0
  • Markey, R., McIvor, J., O'Brien, M., & Wright, C. F. (2019). Reducing carbon emissions through employee participation: Evidence from Australia. Industrial Relations Journal, 50(1), 57–83. DOI: 10.1111/irj.12238
  • Dumont, J., Shen, J., & Deng, X. (2017). Effects of Green HRM Practices on Employee Workplace Green Behaviour: The Role of Psychological Green Climate and Employee Green Values. Human Resource Management, 56(4), 613–627. DOI: 10.1002/hrm.21792
  • Rayner, J., & Morgan, D. (2018). An empirical study of 'green' workplace behaviours: Ability, motivation and opportunity. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 56(1), 56–78. DOI: 10.1111/1744-7941.12151
  • Sanders, M. J. (2018). Older manufacturing workers and adaptation to age-related changes. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(3), 7203205060. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2018.021238
  • Previtali, F., & Spedale, S. (2021). Doing age in the workplace: Exploring age categorisation in performance appraisal. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, 100981. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100981
  • Gut, V., Feer, S., & Baumann, I. (2024). A resource-oriented perspective on the ageing workforce – exploring job resource profiles and their associations with various health indicators. BMC Public Health, 24(1). DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20098-4