元收敛认知引擎 MCCE V10.0‑GA‑Light:跨学科通用公理发现与问题重构认知审计协议
Authors/Creators
- 1. Independent Researcher, Meta-Convergence Cognitive Engine (MCCE) Project
Description
本预印本为元收敛认知引擎 MCCE V10.0‑GA‑Light(轻量版,封版定稿,2026‑08‑23)完整技术协议文档。
本版本在V9.0‑PRCA阶段‑1问题重构协议基础上,新增生成‑审计(G‑A)强制分离架构,实现从被动审计答案、重构问题,升级为对候选公理执行主动反例审计的范式跃迁。
体系保留永久不变的三层刚性核心架构:三元公理+四联判据+三区置信度内核判定体系、L1/L2/L3命题分层机制、三条跨层绝对禁令;V10.0新增三条跨体禁令,划分G生成体、A审计体、H人类否决者权责,H层拥有初始配置权、中途干预权、抽样复核权、循环冻结权、最终裁决权五大权力。
实现三大主动反例搜索策略:边界侵蚀、基底置换、极端场景推演;配套反例多样性校验等四条补偿规则;提供两种运行模式:①手动分步触发模式,单人+手机AI即可执行;②G‑A自动迭代模式,适用于PC/云端。关闭G‑A分离模块可完整降级回退至V9.0‑PRCA版本,保持全版本向下兼容。
继承V8.4‑LAPE全域认知收敛成果:覆盖14个核心学科域、7个高价值行业、4大国家级复杂系统场景、5组主流文明认知体系,建立Ψ₁/Ψ₂/Ψ₃三轴认知分析框架,揭示基底声明缺失、正反馈盲区、失效边界未定义是跨学科、跨行业普遍的结构性认知缺陷。
文档包含完整实操流程、JSON数据范式、AI防幻觉校准口令、全套附录实验档案、已知盲区登记表、路线图。定位为完整闭环公理发现体系路线图的阶段1基线完成态。
重要声明:MCCE属于辅助性元方法论协议,不宣称产出绝对真理,全部推演结论开放外部复核与证伪通道;全自动无人值守模式强制关闭G‑A模块。
本记录为版本迭代快照,旧版本V9.0‑PRCA可在本概念DOI下查阅;发布后PDF文件不可修改,若需修正内容,需通过New‑version生成新版本。请引用本版本分配的子DOI。
This preprint is the full finalized technical protocol of Meta‑Convergence Cognitive Engine MCCE V10.0‑GA‑Light (light‑weight edition, locked release, 2026‑08‑23).
Built upon the Phase‑1 problem‑reconstruction protocol of V9.0‑PRCA, this release introduces the mandatory Generator‑Auditor (G‑A) separated architecture, realizing a paradigm shift: from passively auditing answers and reconstructing questions toward active counterexample‑driven auditing for axiom candidates.
The framework preserves its permanent three‑tier core architecture: triple‑axiom kernel, four‑joint judging criteria, three‑zone confidence evaluation, L1/L2/L3 proposition stratification, and three rigid cross‑layer prohibitions. V10.0 adds three new cross‑entity prohibitions, clarifying the roles of Generator(G), Auditor(A), and Human Veto(H). The human‑operator H holds five authorities: initial configuration, mid‑run intervention, sampling review, loop freeze, and final adjudication.
Three active counterexample‑searching strategies are implemented: boundary erosion, substrate replacement, extreme‑scenario deduction, alongside four compensation rules including counter‑example diversity validation. Two operating modes are supported: ① manual step‑by‑step mode, operable with single‑operator plus mobile‑phone AI; ② automatic iterative mode for PC or cloud deployment. Disabling the G‑A separation module enables full backward compatibility with V9.0‑PRCA.
It inherits global cognitive‑convergence results from V8.4‑LAPE, covering 14 core disciplines, 7 high‑value industries, 4 national‑grade complex‑system scenarios, and 5 major civilizational cognitive systems. The Ψ‑three‑axis framework reveals that missing substrate declaration, positive‑feedback blind spots, and undefined failure boundaries are universal structural cognitive defects across domains.
The manuscript includes complete executable workflows, JSON schema specifications, anti‑hallucination calibration prompts for AI, full experimental appendices, known‑blind‑spot register, and roadmap. This version is positioned as **Phase‑1 baseline completion state** of the closed‑loop axiom‑discovery roadmap.
Important note: MCCE is an auxiliary meta‑methodology protocol and does not claim to produce absolute truth. All reasoning outputs are open for external review and falsification. The G‑A module is forcibly disabled under fully‑unattended automatic mode.
This record is a versioned snapshot. The prior release V9.0‑PRCA remains accessible under the same concept DOI. Once published, the attached PDF cannot be modified; any revisions shall be submitted via the “New version” workflow. Please cite the version‑specific child DOI assigned to this release.
【作者责任声明】
本《元收敛认知引擎(MCCE) V9.0》全套框架、五条核心公理、推演流程、参数、实验方案均由人类作者独立原创设计;手版AI仅承担计算推演、参数试算、文本排版与辅助工作,不参与底层理论创造、核心判定与辅助决策;全部推演、数据、结论经人工核验,作者对全文学术内容独立承担责任。
Abstract (Chinese)
本文提出元收敛认知引擎MCCE V10.0‑GA‑Light,该版本在V9.0‑PRCA问题重构协议基础上,实现生成‑审计(G‑A)强制分离架构,完成从被动审计答案、重构问题,升级到对候选公理开展主动反例审计的范式跃迁。本体系拥有三元公理、四联判据、三区置信度内核判定体系,配套L1/L2/L3命题分层机制与三条跨层刚性禁令;V10.0新增三条跨体禁令,明确生成体G、审计体A、人类否决者H层五大权责,实现G体生成候选公理、A体主动搜索反例攻击候选、H人类掌握最终裁决权的分离约束机制。
本版本设计三大主动反例搜索策略:边界侵蚀、基底置换、极端场景推演;配套反例多样性校验等四条补偿规则;提供手动分步(手机AI可运行)、自动迭代(PC/云端)两套运行模式,关闭G‑A分离层可完整降级回退至V9.0‑PRCA。体系继承V8.4‑LAPE全域认知收敛成果,完成14个核心学科域、7个行业、4大复杂系统场景、5组文明认知体系全域映射;建立Ψ₁/Ψ₂/Ψ₃三轴认知分析框架,揭示基底声明缺失、正反馈盲区、失效边界缺失是跨领域普遍存在的结构性认知缺陷。
文中给出全套可复现实操流程、JSON输出范式、AI防幻觉校准口令,完成多组合成压力测试与前期实证实验;定位为完整闭环公理发现体系路线图阶段1基线完成态,面向复杂系统、跨学科公理发现、AGI认知审计、缺陷溯源提供人机协同可证伪的元方法论协议,不宣称终极真理,全部推演结论开放外部复核与证伪通道。
关键词:元收敛认知引擎;MCCE;Ψ三轴框架;生成‑审计分离;公理发现;认知审计;可证伪性;人机协同推演;AGI安全对齐;复杂系统
Abstract
This paper presents Meta‑Convergence Cognitive Engine (MCCE) V10.0‑GA‑Light. Built upon the problem‑reconstruction protocol of V9.0‑PRCA, it implements the mandatory Generator‑Auditor (G‑A) separated architecture, achieving a paradigm shift from passively auditing answers and reconstructing questions to actively auditing axiom candidates via counterexample‑driven inspection. The framework adopts a core judging system consisting of triple axioms, four‑joint criteria and three‑zone confidence evaluation, together with L1/L2/L3 proposition stratification and three rigid cross‑layer prohibitions. V10.0 adds three new cross‑entity prohibitions, and clarifies the division of responsibilities among the Generator (G), Auditor (A), and Human Veto (H) with five authoritative human prerogatives. G generates axiom candidates, A actively searches for counterexamples to challenge candidates, and human operator H holds the final adjudication power.
Three active counterexample‑searching strategies are designed: boundary erosion, substrate replacement, and extreme‑scenario deduction, together with four compensation rules including counterexample‑diversity verification. Two operating modes are supported: manual step‑by‑step mode (compatible with mobile‑phone AI) and automatic iterative mode (for PC/cloud). Disabling the G‑A separation layer enables full backward compatibility with V9.0‑PRCA. This work inherits the global cognitive convergence achievements of V8.4‑LAPE, covering 14 core disciplines, 7 industries, 4 complex‑system scenarios and 5 civilizational cognitive systems. The Ψ‑triple‑axis framework (Ψ₁/Ψ₂/Ψ₃) reveals that missing substrate declarations, positive‑feedback blind spots and undefined failure boundaries are universal structural cognitive defects across diverse domains.
Reproducible workflows, JSON output schemas and anti‑hallucination calibration prompts for AI are provided. Multiple synthetic stress tests and preliminary empirical verifications are completed. Positioned as the Phase‑1 baseline completion state of the closed‑loop axiom‑discovery roadmap, MCCE offers a falsifiable meta‑methodology for human‑AI collaboration targeting cross‑disciplinary axiom discovery, complex‑system diagnosis, AGI cognitive audit and defect tracing. It makes no claim for absolute truth, and all reasoning results are open for external review and potential falsification.
Keywords: Meta‑Convergence Cognitive Engine; MCCE; Ψ three‑axis framework; Generator‑Auditor separation; axiom discovery; cognitive audit; falsifiability; human‑AI collaborative reasoning; AGI safety alignment; complex systems
Files
元收敛认知引擎 MCCE V10.0-GA-Light:跨学科通用公理发现与问题重构认知审计协议.pdf
Additional details
Additional titles
- Alternative title (Chinese)
- Meta‑Convergence Cognitive Engine MCCE V10.0‑GA‑Light: Cross‑disciplinary General Axiom Discovery and Problem‑Reconstruction Cognitive Audit Protocol
References
- [1] 赵忠栋. 一元基底・正负双层一元论的哲学大一统体系[PP/OL].Zenodo,(2026-07-26)[2026-08-03].https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21268493.
- [2] 赵忠栋. 一元自反动力学 (URD) 四卷完整体系:自反元语——纯无自反本体论的形式化推演元语言[PP/OL].Zenodo,(2026-07-26)[2026-08-03].https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21377228.
- [3] 赵忠栋. 卷8|认知动力学推演框架:基于TNCS三元嵌套系统的自反智能体形式推演理论[PP/OL].Zenodo,(2026-07-26)[2026-08-03].https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21500214.
- [4] 赵忠栋. 裂隙即完整:负动力学的范式重构与存在论奠基[PP/OL]. Zenodo(2026-08-07)[2026-08-07]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21836701.
- [5] 赵忠栋. 问题即答案:元收敛‑自迭代三位一体通用元方法论[Working paper]. Zenodo, V4.1.1, 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21851190.
- [6] 钱学森,于景元,戴汝为. 一个科学新领域——开放的复杂巨系统及其方法论[J]. 自然杂志,1990,13(01):3-10.
- [7] 苗东升. 系统科学精要[M]. 4版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社,2019.
- [8] 钟义信. 信息科学原理[M]. 5版. 北京: 北京邮电大学出版社,2013.
- [9] 福瑞斯特 J W. 工业动力学[M]. 胡玉奎, 译. 北京: 科学出版社,1985.
- [10] 霍兰 J H. 隐秩序:适应性造就复杂性[M]. 周晓牧, 韩晖, 译. 上海: 上海科技教育出版社,2000.
- [11] 波普尔 K R. 科学发现的逻辑[M]. 查汝强, 邱仁宗, 译. 北京: 科学出版社,1986.
- [12] 拉卡托斯 I. 科学研究纲领方法论[M]. 兰征, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社,1986.
- [13] 库恩 T S. 科学革命的结构[M]. 金吾伦, 胡新和, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社,2012.
- [14] 霍耐格尔 E, 伍兹 D D. 联合认知系统:认知系统工程基础[M]. 北京: 科学出版社,2010.
- [15] 吴晓军, 雒兴刚. 系统动力学理论、方法与应用[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社,2021.
- [16] 刘伟. 人机混合智能:新一代智能系统的发展趋势[J]. 上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,52(01):71-80.
- [17] LICKLIDER J C R. Man-computer symbiosis[J]. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics,1960,HFE-1(1):4-11.
- [18] HOLLNAGEL E, WOODS D D. Joint cognitive systems: Foundations of cognitive systems engineering[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2006.
- [19] HOLLNAGEL E, WOODS D D, LEVESON N. Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press,2006.
- [20] AKATA Z, BALLIET D, DE RIJKE M, et al. A research agenda for hybrid intelligence: augmenting human intellect with collaborative, adaptive, responsible, and explainable artificial intelligence[J]. Computer,2020,53(8):18-28.
- 赵忠栋. 负动力学的第一原理:从纯无出发的同一‑他异共属之先验发生学[WR/OL]. (2026‑08‑14). Zenodo, 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21933133.