Published August 18, 2026 | Version v1.0

Detectability-Aware Screening of Post-Merger Gravitational-Wave Damping Anomalies in Real Detector Noise: A Graph-Spectral Approach with Empirical Null Calibration

Authors/Creators

Description

The post-merger phase of binary neutron star (BNS) coalescences may encode information about matter at extreme densities and could, in principle, be sensitive to non-standard energy-loss channels, including scenarios motivated by dark-sector physics. Deviations in the effective damping time of post-merger oscillations have been proposed as phenomenological proxies for such channels, but identifying short, high-frequency transients in real, non-stationary detector noise remains difficult, and standard statistical assumptions used to calibrate detection thresholds often do not hold in that regime.

We present a two-stage screening framework for a phenomenological damped-sinusoid post-merger proxy, h(t) = A·exp(−t/τ)·sin(2πf_peak·t + φ), injected directly into real LIGO Livingston (L1) background noise. Stage 1 builds a local time-frequency coherence graph from a Constant-Q representation of each whitened candidate window and computes its leading eigenvalue as a detectability statistic, motivated by the detectability-transition logic of spiked random matrices (the Baik–Ben Arous–Péché transition) rather than a closed-form Gaussian-noise assumption. We validate the matched-filter SNR normalization with a synthetic Gaussian-noise control, and separately validate the graph statistic with power-comparison and tile-shuffling tests showing sensitivity to local time-frequency organization beyond total integrated power, with the effect strongest for the shortest, most compact injected transients. Its null distribution is calibrated empirically on real detector noise, since we find directly that real LIGO noise does not satisfy the Gaussian assumptions a closed-form threshold would require. Stage 2 estimates an effective damping time for Stage-1-passing candidates using an interpretable ridge/energy-decay fit and a classical nonlinear least-squares fit, and compares each against a threshold calibrated on the standard damping-time distribution (τ = 5–40 ms).

All thresholds and models are fixed on independent calibration and training data and evaluated once, after the design was frozen, on a held-out real-noise segment untouched during development. The least-squares estimator is the strongest Stage-2 discriminator (AUC = 0.943); the ridge/energy- decay estimator is a secondary, model-light, time-frequency-native alternative with competitive ranking-level separation but lower recall at a matched low-false-positive operating point. A simple total-power baseline is shown to be a real but substantially weaker, direction-sensitive discriminator.

Files

GW_MOOR_Proof (2).pdf

Files (3.4 MB)

Name Size
md5:9637a8ecad651b451a979a16567b6def
3.8 kB Preview Download
md5:0cfadd8c2eca98eb6a736f7382de9d30
905.9 kB Preview Download
md5:db31720d78e515efaa0a1d19017308f8
489.6 kB Preview Download
md5:f44104098089b5a29fa3ea32587211ae
862.9 kB Preview Download
md5:5d0be57c7d820f9091317d1501e34fa4
217.9 kB Preview Download
md5:6b7cbd54a0a87f2d51352a4d6a767c80
418.2 kB Preview Download
md5:236a8f3159c2164af79c76043002e891
168.0 kB Preview Download
md5:01b3d2b2dec2039d23cbe5f77a662c63
184.1 kB Preview Download
md5:b926f3aee511030af29e3490255dfdb5
121.1 kB Preview Download
md5:9f9809a55f96e1f98fb06e0f574cf802
30.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is supplemented by
Workflow: https://github.com/ruslanalas/gw-postmerger-detectability (Other)

Dates

Created
2026-08-18

Software

Repository URL
https://github.com/ruslanalas/gw-postmerger-detectability
Programming language
Python
Development Status
Active

References

  • B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), "Search for Post-merger Gravitational Waves from the Remnant of the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817," The Astrophysical Journal Letters 851, L16 (2017).
  • A. Bauswein, N. Stergioulas, and H.-T. Janka, "Exploring properties of high-density matter through remnants of neutron-star mergers," European Physical Journal A 52, 56 (2016).
  • R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), "Open data from the first and second observing runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo," SoftwareX 13, 100658 (2021).
  • C. Chatterjee, A. Petulante, Y. Hu, R. Lau, S. Deshmukh, H. Fu, T. Hoang, S. C. Zhao, J. Spencer-Smith, and K. Jani, "Pre-trained Audio Transformer as a Foundational AI Tool for Gravitational Waves," arXiv:2412.20789v2 [gr-qc] (2025).
  • W. G. Anderson, P. R. Brady, J. D. E. Creighton, and E. E. Flanagan, "Excess power statistic for detection of burst sources of gravitational radiation," Physical Review D 63, 042003 (2001).
  • S. Klimenko and G. Mitselmakher, "A wavelet method for detection of gravitational wave bursts," Classical and Quantum Gravity 21, S1819 (2004).
  • S. Chatterji, L. Blackburn, G. Martin, and E. Katsavounidis, "Multiresolution techniques for the detection of gravitational-wave bursts," Classical and Quantum Gravity 21, S1809 (2004).
  • D. George and E. A. Huerta, "Deep neural networks to enable real-time multimessenger astrophysics," Physical Review D 97, 044039 (2018).
  • P. Laguarta et al., "Detection of anomalies amongst LIGO's glitch populations with autoencoders," Classical and Quantum Gravity 41, 055004 (2024).
  • T. Whittaker, W. E. East, S. R. Green, L. Lehner, and H. Yang, "Using machine learning to parametrize postmerger signals from binary neutron stars," Physical Review D 105, 124021 (2022).
  • R. Weerasinghe, "Real-Time Multi-Mode Post-Merger Gravitational Wave Detection using Convolutional Neural Networks: Methodology Development for Third-Generation Detectors," arXiv:2601.00985 [astro-ph.IM] (2026).
  • J. Baik, G. Ben Arous, and S. Péché, "Phase transition of the largest eigenvalue for nonnull complex sample covariance matrices," Annals of Probability 33, 1643 (2005).
  • R. R. Nadakuditi and M. E. J. Newman, "Graph spectra and the detectability of community structure in networks," Physical Review Letters 108, 188701 (2012).
  • A. Decelle, F. Krzakala, C. Moore, and L. Zdeborová, "Asymptotic analysis of the stochastic block model for modular networks and its algorithmic applications," Physical Review E 84, 066106 (2011).