There is a newer version of the record available.

Published August 17, 2026 | Version v2

The Intent Bottleneck: When AI Compresses Delivery, Strategy Becomes the Constraint

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Robotiqa Technologies Ltd.

Description

This working paper argues that AI-native delivery compresses only the final stage of a six-stage chain running from an institution's covenant with those it serves to running software, so that by Amdahl's law the constraint moves upstream into how organisations form, prioritise, and preserve intent. It introduces intent provenance — the unbroken, traceable, durable, machine-checkable, and contestable chain from a stated obligation to the test that proves it in production — and the service covenant as the layer above vision and mission at the top of that chain. In closing it defines decision custody: an institution's demonstrated ability to reproduce, explain, defend, and answer for every consequential decision made in its name, human or machine, for as long as the consequences of that decision last. Decision custody is positioned as the institutional counterpart to decision sovereignty, a state-level concept defined elsewhere in the literature. The covenant is the promise; custody is the proof. Part of the Sovereign Digital Resilience series.

Files

the-intent-bottleneck.pdf

Files (562.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:d408070ddc318e4dc18b2f6b19048288
562.2 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

References

  • Wei, P., Shu, W., Preserving Decision Sovereignty in Military AI: A Trade-Secret-Safe Architectural Framework for Model Replaceability, Human Authority, and State Control, arXiv:2604.20867, 2026.
  • Amdahl, G. M., Validity of the Single Processor Approach to Achieving Large Scale Computing Capabilities, AFIPS Conference Proceedings, 1967.
  • Becker, J., Rush, N., Barnes, B., Rein, D., Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced Open-Source Developer Productivity, METR, 2025.