Published August 15, 2026 | Version 6.0-beta-0.1
Book Open

Wave Relativity: Unifying Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity Without New Physics

Authors/Creators

Description

Wave Relativity re-derives the classical and semiclassical content of physics, and the architecture of the Standard Model, from one principle: equations for physically-real potentials must be self-consistent. Three structural requirements (frame-independence, index matching, and self-sourcing) are applied to three empirically-grounded starting equations. Maxwell on a physically-real four-potential Aμ yields electromagnetism with special relativity. Newton's law on a physically-real metric potential gμν yields general relativity through a fixed-point equation iterated to all orders. The Davisson-Germer-anchored matter wave ψ, under the same requirements together with Stern-Gerlach, neutron interferometry under 4π rotation, and Pauli exclusion, yields the Dirac equation in curved spacetime as the minimal Lorentz-covariant first-order wave equation whose square is Klein-Gordon.

The three potentials (gμν, Aμ, ψ) then assemble as aspect-content of one Dirac-spinor substrate Ψ. The matter wave is Ψ's WKB amplitude reduction on a single-spin mode; the gauge potential and metric are separate fields sourced by Ψ-built objects through Maxwell's and Einstein's equations, with gauge-class freedom and vacuum-sector solutions retained. The apparent incompatibility of quantum mechanics and general relativity dissolves: it was the artefact of treating gμν and ψ as independent fields requiring separate quantisation. The conventional quantum-gravity programme was quantising the wrong object.

One master equation, the Dirac equation on curved spacetime 𝒞[Ψ], governs the coupled system. Under scale limits (v/c, λdB/L, λdB/ℓP) it reduces to classical mechanics, special relativity, general relativity, and standard quantum mechanics. No new physics is introduced, no quantisation programme is applied to gravity, and all empirical inputs are audited.

A second arc derives the Standard Model's internal-component architecture from Ψ's structure as a Dirac-spinor substrate. The internal directions on which Lorentz-scalar self-consistency closes (overall phase, an internal ℂ3xyz factor anchored by three-constituent baryons and constituent-anticonstituent mesons, and a conversion fiber ℂ2W on the L-projection anchored by charged-current doublet pairings) pick out the Standard Model gauge group with no postulated factors. Spin and chirality emerge as wave-geometric structure on Ψ. The particle spectrum is classified as localised normal-mode classes of Ψ. Hypercharge ratios follow from chiral-anomaly cancellation on the matter-mode trace, and the quark/lepton split follows from singlet stability under self-sourcing. The composite chiral background, Ψ's only L-R, xyz-singlet, SU(2)W-doublet bilinear channel, plays the role of the Higgs without a postulated scalar field; closed-form weak and strong operators and a kernel-coefficient block supply the load-bearing profile coefficients. Tree-level Standard Model phenomenology recovers as a checkpoint, with master-integral residues and gauge-cancellation, UV-finiteness, and hierarchy theorems closing at the bosonic precision frontier.

Earlier editions (v2.0, v3.0) progressively tightened the structural rigor of the multi-particle lift, reduced the bosonic precision-electroweak residue to a bounded master-integral computation, and recovered the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy and Hawking flux as substrate-mode-count identities through the Susskind-Uglum heat-kernel reading; forward-prediction content (matter-wave self-gravity breathing-mode ω = √(4πGρ/3); non-product configurations requiring a connected scaffold) and the projection-validity-boundary treatment of the Schwarzschild and FLRW singularities were set in place. v4.0 carries the v3.0 forward fronts unchanged and lands three new commitments.

v4.0 dark-matter integration. The realised sterile slot NL + νR commits in Ch. 26 §26.6 with the resulting 4×3 rank-three neutral mass matrix forcing one exactly massless active eigenstate and mββ = 0 as a strict-EFT prediction under B-L preservation. Ch. 29 §29.7 reads the heavy mostly-sterile eigenstate as the Conditional CDM Proposition at the spin-resolved PIDM closure curve ms ∼ 1012 GeV through gravitational production. App. A §A.6 catalogues five conditional residues for the dark-matter scenario. The two companion papers (Tan 2026a on the rank-three Dirac extension forcing the massless-active-mass conclusion, Tan 2026b on the dark-matter phenomenology of the heavy mostly-sterile state) carry the paper-level treatments referenced by the body.

v4.0 Yang-Mills mass gap on substrate ontology. Ch. 18 §§18.7-18.8 reframes the Clay Quantum Yang-Mills existence and mass-gap problem on the substrate: pure Yang-Mills is the projection of the WR substrate onto the gauge-only sector, and substrate-level positivity together with the spectral structure of the matter-mode trace deliver a structural mass-gap statement on the projected gauge theory. The companion paper (Tan 2026c) carries the paper-level treatment.

v4.0 Lovelock-anchored closed form of gμν = 𝒞μν[Ψ]. Ch. 20 §20.8 displays the closed form of the metric response functional through Lovelock's theorem: under four-dimensional locality, diffeomorphism invariance, and second-order field-equation structure, the gravitational response of Ψ is forced to Einstein-Hilbert plus a cosmological term, with no remaining freedom in the projection.

Intended for readers with undergraduate-or-first-year-graduate familiarity with special relativity, general relativity, and wave-mechanical quantum mechanics. The book requires comfort with four-vectors, tensor indices, and wave equations; it does not require fibre-bundle language or path integrals.

Files

wave-relativity.pdf

Files (5.5 MB)

Name Size
md5:cd81ecd5275a1ac17f4bd762c0d7a4fa
5.5 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is published in
Book: https://leanpub.com/wave-relativity (URL)

References

  • Aharonov, Y.; Bohm, D. (1959). Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory. Physical Review 115, 485.
  • Tonomura, A. et al. (1986). Evidence for Aharonov-Bohm effect with magnetic field completely shielded from electron wave. Physical Review Letters 56, 792.
  • Davisson, C.; Germer, L. H. (1927). Diffraction of Electrons by a Crystal of Nickel. Physical Review 30, 705.
  • Dirac, P. A. M. (1928). The Quantum Theory of the Electron. Proceedings of the Royal Society A 117, 610.
  • Colella, R.; Overhauser, A. W.; Werner, S. A. (1975). Observation of Gravitationally Induced Quantum Interference. Physical Review Letters 34, 1472.
  • Wu, T. T.; Yang, C. N. (1975). Concept of nonintegrable phase factors and global formulation of gauge fields. Physical Review D 12, 3845.
  • Abbott, B. P. et al. (LIGO/Virgo) (2017). Gravitational Waves and Gamma-Rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A. Astrophysical Journal Letters 848, L13.
  • Yang, C. N.; Mills, R. L. (1954). Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance. Physical Review 96, 191.
  • Feynman, R. P. (1963). Lectures on Gravitation. California Institute of Technology.
  • Ogievetsky, V. I.; Polubarinov, I. V. (1965). Interacting Field of Spin 2 and the Einstein Equations. Annals of Physics 35, 167.
  • Deser, S. (1970). Self-interaction and gauge invariance. General Relativity and Gravitation 1, 9.
  • Wu, C. S. et al. (1957). Experimental Test of Parity Conservation in Beta Decay. Physical Review 105, 1413.
  • Manfredi, G.; Hervieux, P.-A.; Haas, F. (2013). Variational approach to the time-dependent Schrödinger-Newton equations. New Journal of Physics 15, 075004.
  • Großardt, A.; Bera, S.; Kumar, P.; Bose, S. (2016). Optomechanical test of the Schrödinger-Newton equation. Physical Review D 93, 096003.
  • Bekenstein, J. D. (1973). Black holes and entropy. Physical Review D 7, 2333.
  • Hawking, S. W. (1975). Particle creation by black holes. Communications in Mathematical Physics 43, 199.
  • Penrose, R. (1965). Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities. Physical Review Letters 14, 57.
  • Borde, A.; Guth, A. H.; Vilenkin, A. (2003). Inflationary spacetimes are incomplete in past directions. Physical Review Letters 90, 151301.
  • Susskind, L.; Uglum, J. (1994). Black hole entropy in canonical quantum gravity and superstring theory. Physical Review D 50, 2700.
  • Wald, R. M. (1993). Black hole entropy is Noether charge. Physical Review D 48, R3427.
  • Parikh, M. K.; Wilczek, F. (2000). Hawking radiation as tunneling. Physical Review Letters 85, 5042.
  • Dimock, J. (1982). Dirac quantum fields on a manifold. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 269, 133.
  • Bär, C.; Ginoux, N.; Pfäffle, F. (2007). Wave Equations on Lorentzian Manifolds and Quantization. ESI Lectures, European Mathematical Society.
  • Lovelock, D. (1971). The Einstein tensor and its generalizations. Journal of Mathematical Physics 12, 498.
  • Lovelock, D. (1972). The four-dimensionality of space and the Einstein tensor. Journal of Mathematical Physics 13, 874.
  • Tan, D. F. H. (2026a). A minimal Dirac extension of the Standard Model neutrino sector: rank-three structure forces a vanishing lightest active mass. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20150278
  • Tan, D. F. H. (2026b). Dark-matter phenomenology of the heavy mostly-sterile state in the minimal 4×3 Dirac extension of the Standard Model. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20150280
  • Tan, D. F. H. (2026c). Quantum Yang-Mills existence and mass gap from a Dirac matter substrate construction. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20346524