Contemporary Issues in Islamic Jurisprudence

Jurisprudence is one of the most valuable disciplines since it enablesone to comprehend God Almighty's discourse as well as learn His mandatesand prohibitions. Because jurisprudence is the understanding and knowledgeof practical Shari'a rulings deduced from detailed evidence, and because theincidents to which Islamic jurisprudence refers are renewed and change overtime, Islamic jurisprudence is also renewed, because Shari'a rulings are alwaysvalid and places.As a result, Fiqh Nawâzil (Contemporary Issues Jurisprudence) hasexisted since the Prophet's (SAW) time. When the Companions (RA) faced aproblem, they would turn to the Messenger of God for a fatwa and questionsregarding the rulings, and the revelation would come to him explaining,interpreting, and clarifying their decisions.Following the Prophet's (SAW) death, the Companions made attemptsto cope with tragedies for which they could not find a judgment in the Quranand Sunnah, and these efforts continued to clarify the Sharia ruling andachieve the aim that God desired in His discourse.With the rapid development of life and the growth of lifestyles, it wasimportant for Fiqh Nawâzil to evolve in such a way that the believerunderstood the outcome of Fiqh Nawâzil.Fiqh Nawâzil is a science concerned with explaining verdicts on currentand emergent facts and concerns that demand sharia rules.Fiqh Nawâzil gained popularity as people's lives progressed, eventuallybecoming one of the most important areas of Islamic law. It has been given avariety of names and titles, including contemporary issues, jurisprudence ofmodern issues, etc., and others, all of which fall under the chosen definition.The majority of books on fatwas are Fiqh Nawâzil books, and theliterature on fatwas and Fiqh Nawâzil has changed as these issues have beenrepeated or changed. We have a collection of these contemporary issues in ourhands, so we decided to gather them with Sharia rules on various topical topicsas well as clarify the jurists' perspectives on them.This book is not an effort to give a ruling on new issues (Ijtihad)because ijtihad had a very specific technical meaning relating to the activityof an appropriately qualified jurist (a mujtahid) in producing or justifying alegal judgement (hukm sharʿi) but rather a collection of the jurisprudence andopinions of jurists on various contemporary issues.It is collecting and arranging, which is one of the foundations ofcontemporary scientific research methods. Our work on it is to arrange and7evaluate it in a way that makes it easy for the researchers of knowledge toreach the ruling on that issue along with its evidence for Quaran and Sunnah,and it is beneficial for students and researchers. We made its title “Issues inthe Jurisprudence of Calamities” to indicate that they are separate issues andnot in one chapter of Islamic jurisprudence, and that in the jurisprudence ofsome contemporary issues that occurred with the change in people’s lifestyles.Finally, we express gratitude to researchers and scientific forums fortheir contributions to this work, aiming to renew Islamic jurisprudence, andenabl knowledge-seeking students to study these rulings