Published August 3, 2026 | Version v1

Comprehensive Investigation of Mechanical Properties, Durability, and Microstructural Behavior of Geopolymer Concrete Utilizing Industrial By-Products and Recycled Aggregates

Authors/Creators

Description

Global production of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) remains a major contributor to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for roughly 7% to 9% of total global carbon dioxide output. In response to urgent environmental mandates, geopolymer concrete (GPC) has emerged as an innovative, sustainable construction material that completely eliminates or substantially reduces cement by utilizing aluminosilicate industrial by-products such as Class F fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) activated through alkali solutions. This extensive research evaluates the mechanical properties, long-term durability, and microstructural evolution of GPC formulated with varying proportions of fly ash, GGBFS, and 100% replacement of natural coarse aggregates with recycled concrete aggregates (RCA). Rigorous experimental testing protocols analyzed compressive strength, split tensile strength, flexural behavior, water absorption, rapid chloride migration, sulfate attack resistance, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) over curing periods extending up to 90 days. The findings demonstrate that an optimal 70:30 fly ash-to-GGBFS binder ratio combined with tailored sodium silicate-to-hydroxide proportions yields exceptional early-age strength, superior microstructural densification, and robust durability, presenting an advanced framework for sustainable infrastructure development.

 

Files

(44-49)Comprehensive Investigation of Mechanical Properties.pdf

Files (272.4 kB)

Additional details

References

  • 1. Davidovits, J. (1991). Geopolymers: Inorganic polymeric new materials. Journal of Thermal Analysis, 37(8), 1633–1656. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01912193
  • 2. Hardjito, D., Wallah, S. E., Sumajouw, D. M. J., & Rangan, B. V. (2004). On the development of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 101(6), 467–472. https://doi.org/10.14359/13485
  • 3. Palomo, A., Grutzeck, M. W., & Blanco, M. T. (1999). Alkali-activated fly ashes: A cement for the future. Cement and Concrete Research, 29(8), 1323–1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00243-9
  • 4. Poon, C. S., Shui, Z. H., Lam, L., Fok, H., & Kou, S. C. (2004). Influence of microstructure of recycled aggregate on concrete properties. Cement and Concrete Research, 34(4), 705–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.09.025
  • 5. Provis, J. L., & van Deventer, J. S. J. (Eds.). (2009). Geopolymers: Structures, processing, properties and industrial applications. Woodhead Publishing.
  • 6. Nath, P., & Sarker, P. K. (2014). Use of GGBFS to improve geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition. Construction and Building Materials, 66, 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080
  • 7. Duxson, P., Fernández-Jiménez, A., Provis, J. L., Lukey, G. C., Palomo, A., & van Deventer, J. S. J. (2007). Geopolymer technology: The current state of the art. Journal of Materials Science, 42(9), 2917–2933https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z
  • 8. Xiao, J., Li, W., Fan, Y., & Huang, X. (2012). An overview of study on recycled aggregate concrete in China (1996–2011). Construction and Building Materials, 31, 364–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.074
  • 9. Lloyd, R. R., Provis, J. L., & van Deventer, J. S. J. (2009). Microscopy and microanalysis of inorganic polymer cements. 1: Remnant fly ash particles. Journal of Materials Science, 44(2), 608–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-3077-2
  • 10. Fernández-Jiménez, A., & Palomo, A. (2005). Composition and microstructure of alkali activated fly ash binder: Effect of the activator. Cement and Concrete Research, 35(10), 1984–1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.03.003