There is a newer version of the record available.

Published November 26, 2018 | Version v1
Preprint Open

Exploring dry storage as an alternative biobanking strategy inspired by Nature

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Joseph
  • 2. Pasqua

Description

Biobanking is a rapidly growing industry, covering diverse fields such as human medicine, farm animal production, laboratory animals record keeping, and wildlife conservation. Presently, biobanking is done almost exclusively by cryopreservation, followed by maintenance of the samples under liquid nitrogen. Cryopreservation has satisfactory efficiency but it comes with a host of problems, and the process is highly species-specific. Like in many other walks of life, we turn to Nature in search for better alternatives. Nature opted for controlled drying rather than water preservation via freezing when long-term preservation is desired, a strategy known as ‘anhydrobiosis’. To achieve reversible drying, anhydrobiotic organisms utilise an assortment of protective materials, including disaccharides, late embryogenesis abundant proteins, anhydrin, heat shock protein, and more. Once dry, desiccation-tolerant organisms can survive extended periods of time and be resistant to extreme environmental stressors. Over the past 70 years researchers attempted applying this idea to preserve desiccation-sensitive mammalian cells in the dry form. At present dried cells mostly do not resume biological activity upon rehydration. The DNA, however, is often well preserved to allow utilisation in advanced reproductive techniques. Spermatozoa are by far the most commonly dried cell type, primarily from mice and cows. A number of drying approaches have been applied, with freeze-drying taking the lead. To date offspring have been produced from dried spermatozoa in mouse, rat, hamster, rabbit, and horse. No offspring were produced from dried somatic cells. Desiccation experiences a sharp increase in interest and research output in recent years. Presented here is an overview of dry preservation, its possible applications, the open questions the field is still facing, and some suggested directions for the future.

Notes

Final version of this manuscript was published under DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.11.027 The research presented received funding from MIUR/401 CNR and Program FIRB Grant agreement No. B81J12002520001 "GenHome", as well as from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions "Individual Fellowships (IF)" – DRYSTORE, Grant agreement No. 749537 and "Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (RISE)" – DRYNET, Grant agreement No. 734434, and under the Twinning Action "EraofArt", Grant agreement No. 692185

Files

Saragusty_Drying_review_Preprint.pdf

Files (435.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:1cb512cca5da308a6256fa0d035ac96e
435.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

European Commission
DRYNET - Setting an interdisciplinary/sectorial/international research network to explore dry storage as an alternative strategy for cells/germplasm biobanking 734434
European Commission
ERAofART - Epigenetic Risk Assesment of Assisted Reproductive Technologies 692185
European Commission
DRYSTORE - Exploring dry storage as an alternative biobanking strategy inspired by Nature 749537