Published July 7, 2026 | Version v1

Anadara blanfordi Late Miocene

  • 1. Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Palaeobiology, Box 50007, 10405 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomicrobiology and Environmental Changes, Frontiers Science Center for Deep-time Digital Earth, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China.
  • 3. Department of Geology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, 45137 - 66731, Iran.

Description

Anadara blanfordi (Newton, 1905)

Fig. 5

Arca blanfordi Newton, 1905: 298, pl. 16 fig. 5.

Anadara sp. – Hadi et al. 2024: 12, pl. 5 fig. 5a–c.

Material examined

IRAN – Sistan and Baluchestan • 23 shells; Dar Pahn Unit; GDZU-0314 to GDZU-0337.

Remarks

The specimens reported from “the beach off the Ormara Headland, facing the Mekran or Baluchistan coast, 130 miles west of Karachi” (Newton 1905: 293) are smaller than those reported here (45 mm vs 71 mm in length), but his description of shell outline, inflation, and the number and shape of the ribs leaves no doubt that these specimens belong to the same species.

Similar, but less inflated and smaller is Anadara garoensis Mukerjee, 1939, from the Miocene Garo Hills in the eastern Indian province of Meghalaya (Mukerjee 1939: 26, pl. 22 figs 2–3); it reaches only about a third of the size of A. blanfordi (25.8 mm vs up to 71 mm in length). Also similar is Arca yawensis Noetling, 1901, from the Miocene of Myanmar (Noetling 1901: 144, pl. 6 figs 4–6), which is nearly identical in outline and also very inflated. Noetling reported 29 radial ribs for this species, which falls within the range of the 28–31 present on A. blanfordi. However, the species can be distinguished by the difference in the size of the adductor muscle scars, described as “the posterior one much larger than the anterior one” for A. yawensis, whereas in A. blanfordi they are of subequal size (Fig. 5A–D). The Miocene Anadara gourae Dey, 1961, from Kerala, India, is similar to A. blanfordi especially regarding its outline, but it has more numerous and narrower radial ribs (Dey 1961: pl. 1 figs 4–8). The most similar extant species is Anadara rufescens (Reeve, 1844), an uncommon species that is, however, widely distributed in the Indo-West Pacific Ocean (Mukerjee 1939; Dey 1961).

Notes

Published as part of Kiel, Steffen, Hadi, Mehdi, Ataabadi, Majid Mirzaie & Xi, Dangpeng, 2026, New species and records of Late Miocene mollusks from southeastern Iran, pp. 1-22 in European Journal of Taxonomy 1074 on pages 9-10, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2026.1074.3300, http://zenodo.org/record/21456279

Files

Files (2.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ec71c81ead2af8093d7be8463ba27fe9
2.3 kB Download

System files (22.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:74d7262e205f1a99b6efcc922b5b630c
22.6 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Newton R. B. 1905. An account of some marine fossils contained in limestone nodules found on the Mekran beach, off the Ormara Headland, Baluchistan. Geological Magazine 2: 293-303. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756800124999
  • Hadi M., Ataabadi M. M., Sharifi J., Parandavar M., Castillo-Rodriguez Z. G., Vega-Sandoval F. A. & Vega F. J. 2024. Late Miocene Molluska from the Dar Pahn Unit, Makran, SE Iran. Boletin de la Sociedad Geologica Mexicana 76: A 091223. https://doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2024v76n1a091223
  • Mukerjee P. N. 1939. Fossil fauna from the Tertiary of Garo Hills, Assam. Palaeontologia Indica 28: 1-101.
  • Noetling F. 1901. Fauna of the Miocene beds of Burma. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologia Indica, new series 1: 1-378.
  • Dey A. K. 1961. The Miocene Mollusca from Quilon, Kerala (India). Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologia Indica, new series 36: 1-129.