Published July 17, 2026 | Version v3

Governed Enterprise AI Memory Beyond RAG: From Vector Retrieval to Permissioned Knowledge Graphs

Authors/Creators

Description

A preprint on governed shared AI memory beyond vector RAG. It separates evidence, claims, active facts, permissions, conflicts, and supersession, using Dense-Mem as an example and evaluation test bench. Version 3 documents relationship-heavy and evidence-ID retrieval attempts on a 1,000-document three-axis seed, then reports a 1,000-document six-axis smoke comparison in which evidence-first ranking with relationships reserved for discovery improved Recall@10, MRR, nDCG@10, and rank-1 rate over a retained chunk-first control.

Files

article.pdf

Files (9.1 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:da4ccee36d016d91f07a27efa9d0b6eb
4.1 MB Preview Download
md5:1aec23bf6a61d19fa913ed7586d84868
84.0 kB Download
md5:f6a42ae8e5600eef0458ff8a8b02e774
5.0 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Software

Repository URL
https://github.com/markhuangai/dense-mem
Programming language
Go , TypeScript
Development Status
Active

References

  • Vaswani et al. (2017). Attention Is All You Need. arXiv:1706.03762.
  • Lewis et al. (2020). Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. arXiv:2005.11401.
  • Liu et al. (2024). Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts. arXiv:2307.03172.
  • Edge et al. (2024). From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarization. arXiv:2404.16130.
  • Hsieh et al. (2024). RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models? arXiv:2404.06654.
  • Han et al. (2025). Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Graphs (GraphRAG). arXiv:2501.00309.
  • Zhu et al. (2025). Knowledge Graph-Guided Retrieval Augmented Generation. NAACL 2025. doi:10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.449.
  • Hong et al. (2025). Context Rot: How Increasing Input Tokens Impacts LLM Performance. Chroma Technical Report.
  • McKinsey & Company (2025). The State of AI in 2025: Agents, Innovation, and Transformation.
  • Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (2026). The 2026 AI Index Report.
  • Rasmussen et al. (2025). Zep: A Temporal Knowledge Graph Architecture for Agent Memory. arXiv:2501.13956.
  • Taheri (2026). Governed Memory: A Production Architecture for Multi-Agent Workflows. arXiv:2603.17787.
  • Chamarty (2026). Context Objects: A Temporal, Provenance-Aware Memory Primitive for Enterprise AI Agents. SSRN. doi:10.2139/ssrn.6775102.
  • Srinivasan (2026). Stateless Decision Memory for Enterprise AI Agents. arXiv:2604.20158.
  • Yu et al. (2025). EKRAG: Benchmark RAG for Enterprise Knowledge Question Answering. ACL Anthology.
  • Cohen et al. (2025). WixQA: A Multi-Dataset Benchmark for Enterprise Retrieval-Augmented Generation. arXiv:2505.08643.
  • Sun et al. (2026). EnterpriseRAG-Bench: A RAG Benchmark for Company Internal Knowledge. arXiv:2605.05253.
  • Huang (2026). AI Memory Beyond RAG. Blog post. https://markhuang.ai/blog/ai-memory-beyond-rag.
  • Huang (2026). Dense-Mem. Software repository. https://github.com/markhuangai/dense-mem.
  • Thakur et al. (2021). BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models. NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks.
  • Wadden et al. (2020). Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims. EMNLP 2020. doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.609.
  • Yang et al. (2018). HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering. EMNLP 2018. doi:10.18653/v1/D18-1259.
  • Bajaj et al. (2016). MS MARCO: A Human Generated Machine Reading Comprehension Dataset. arXiv:1611.09268.
  • Trivedi et al. (2022). MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Composition. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 10. doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00475.
  • Dasigi et al. (2021). A Dataset of Information-Seeking Questions and Answers Anchored in Research Papers. NAACL 2021. doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.365.
  • Wu et al. (2024). LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memory. arXiv:2410.10813.