TOPO-2026: The Cognitive Phase Diagram Mapping the Stability-Plasticity Landscape of Biological and Artificial Learning
Description
TOPO-2026: The Cognitive Phase Diagram — Full Summary
Document Overview
-
Title: TOPO-2026: The Cognitive Phase Diagram — Mapping the Stability-Plasticity Landscape of Biological and Artificial Learning
-
Author: Frank Morales Aguilera, BEng, MEng, SMIEEE
-
Affiliation: Sovereign Machine Lab (SOMALA), Montréal, Canada
-
Date: June 2026
-
Deterministic Seed: 1231
Executive Summary
This paper introduces a framework that resolves the 35-year-old catastrophic forgetting problem, reclassifying it from a computational "bug" into a manageable feature of the stability-plasticity trade-off. It identifies that biological learning operates across five distinct "gears."
The Core Discovery: Solving Catastrophic Forgetting
The research demonstrates that catastrophic forgetting can be eliminated, achieving a net improvement in backward transfer rather than data loss.
| Metric | Result |
| Mean Backward Transfer | +1.55% |
| Worst-Case Forgetting | +3.25% |
| Numerical Instability | 0 events |
The Five Cognitive States
The brain moves between discrete states based on the balance between stability (memory retention) and plasticity (new learning).
| Run | Cognitive State | Brain Mode |
| 1 | Elder/Expert | Consolidation-dominant (sleep) |
| 4 | Healthy Adult | Homeostatic balance |
| 0 | Average | Default mode |
| 3 | Young/Student | Encoding-dominant (wake) |
| 2 | Burnout/Overload | Dysregulated stress |
Topological Governance
The framework uses a Topological Governor, a prime-anchored embedding constraint that ensures long-term memory stability.
-
Mathematical Foundation: Using Euler's product, six prime anchors ($2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13$) capture $97.85\%$ of all spectral weight in the embedding space.
-
Mechanism: It utilizes hippocampal-inspired functions such as
take_snapshot()for memory traces andenforce_anchors()for restoration.
Learning Rate Configurations
The ratio between embedding learning rates governs optimization (lr_embed) and classification learning rates (lr_cls). The research finds that optimal balance is achieved when lr_embed ≈ 2 × lr_cls.
| Run | State | Ratio | Result |
| 1 & 4 | Optimal (Expert/Adult) | 2.0 | Stable, high retention |
| 3 | Young/Student | 1.0 | High plasticity, lower stability |
| 2 | Burnout | 5.0 | Pathological, low old-memory retention |
Practical Applications
-
Education: Tailoring learning strategies to age-appropriate states (e.g., maximizing plasticity for children, stability for elders).
-
Mental Health: Identifying patterns such as ADHD or burnout by matching cognitive performance profiles to specific "runs."
-
AI Safety: Deploying "Safe AI" (Run 1) for safety-critical systems, or "Learning AI" (Run 3) for research environments.
Certification Summary
The framework passed all empirical benchmarks for stability and accuracy.
| Metric | Result | Status |
| Task C Accuracy | 92.3% | PASS |
| Combined Forgetting | 1.55% | PASS |
| Anchor Memory | 67.5 KB | PASS |
Resources
-
Model: Hugging Face Repository
-
Code: GitHub Implementation
Catastrophic forgetting is not a bug. It is a feature of the stability-plasticity trade-off. The Cognitive Phase Diagram is the map of the mind.
Seed = 123. The truth is in the cloud.
Files
TOPO-2026-COGNITION.pdf
Files
(381.1 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:c88286e820b7257e6822ecd28f128510
|
381.1 kB | Preview Download |