Published June 23, 2026 | Version v1

Optimization of CO2 feeding strategy for synthetic biogas upgrading in a three-cell electromethanogenesis stack

Description

Electromethanogenesis (EMG) is a bioelectrochemical carbon capture and utilization technology that can upgrade biogas into biomethane (CH₄) while enabling CO2 recycling and renewable energy storage. So far, most EMG studies focused on electrode materials, applied cathode potential/cell voltage, or microbial community enrichment strategies, while the CO2 feeding strategy received comparatively less attention [1]. In most systems, CO2 or biogas are continuously supplied to the cell without controlling empty bed gas residence time (EBRT) or minimizing the fraction of unreacted CO2 in the outlet gas. However, the CO2 supply strategy can strongly influence its availability at the biocathode, the CH4 production rate and its purity in the outlet gas mixture.

The objective of this study was therefore to optimize the CO2 feeding strategy in a 3-cells EMG stack, to maximize the CO2 conversion efficiency and improve CH₄ production. Three double-chamber cells with stainless-steel wool electrodes (85 cm2 each) were operated at 35ºC and hydraulically connected in parallel to a common catholyte recirculation tank, functioning as a gas-liquid separator. The bioanodes were continuously fed with an acetate-based synthetic wastewater, while the biocathodes were supplied with CO2 as carbon source. The cells were individually controlled using a potentiostat with the anode poised at -0.10 V vs Ag/AgCl. The CO2 feeding was regulated through an automated control system, to adjust the EBRT of CO2 and minimize the amount of unreacted CO2 in the produced gas.

Operation with pure CO2 allowed the identification of the optimal feeding conditions of the EMG stack, based on the semi-continuous CO2 injection at a low flow rate (0.21 mL/min), which increased the specific CH4 content in the produced gas while maintaining its production rate (Table 1). Starting under these baseline conditions, the system was subsequently supplied with synthetic biogas (40:60% CO2:N2) to simulate anaerobic digestion biogas effluent and evaluate the feasibility of EMG for its upgrading. The 3-cell stack allowed the conversion of the residual CO2 present in the synthetic biogas, producing an additional 0.2 m3-CH4/m3cat/d and upgrading the biogas to a final CH4 concentration of 88 ± 1% with a specific energy consumption of 13 ± 7 kWh/m3 of treated gas. These values fall within the range reported for bioelectrochemical biogas upgrading systems, where CH₄ contents typically range between 85 and 98%, depending on reactor configuration and operating conditions [2].  

To further investigate the biological response to the different gas feeding strategies, cathode biofilm samples were analyzed. Metagenomic sequencing together with qPCR quantification of methanogenesis-related genes revealed shifts in microbial community structure and functional gene abundance when switching from pure CO2 to synthetic biogas conditions. The results suggest that the lower CO2 partial pressure in synthetic biogas, compared to pure CO2 operation, may affect the activity of the methanogenic biocathode under the tested conditions.

Overall, this work demonstrates that controlling CO2 supply is a key operational parameter for improving EMG biogas upgrading and provides new insights into the interaction between gas feeding strategy, process performance, and microbial community adaptation in an EMG stack.

 

Table 1. Comparison of reactor performance using pure CO2 and synthetic biogas feeds

Type of feed

CO2 inlet flow (mL/min)

CO2 EBTR (d)

CH4 (%)

CO2 conversion eff. (%)

Specific production rate (m3 -CH4/m3 /d)

Electricity consumption (kWh/m3 treated gas)

Pure CO2

0.21

14

84 ± 3

66 ± 20

0.5 ± 0.2

32 ± 3

Synthetic biogas

0.15

20

88 ± 1

63 ± 15

0.2 ± 0.1

13 ± 7

Files

Fuels-C_ ISMET2026_Poster_A0_MV.pdf

Files (2.6 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:40c95150647a35dd263ff72de4e0b3ae
2.6 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

European Commission
Fuels-C - An integrated platform of novel cost and energy-efficient conversion technologies producing liquid and gaseous bioFUELS from sustainable biogenic residues validated for direct use in fuel Cells 101147442