The Euro as a Monetary Cascade Attractor: Cross-Jurisdictional Residue, Reversal-Resistance, and the Accountability of Monetary Choice
Description
This paper applies the structural supranational criterion to Economic and Monetary Union and the single currency. The supranational criterion holds that an entity is a supranational cascade attractor when its binding residue density spans jurisdictions so that no single jurisdiction's reversal dissolves the network, and it reads density as a multiplicative product of extent, depth, and interconnection in which a necessary component at near-zero nullifies the whole. The Euro is classified by outcome-independent markers. A single legal-tender currency that replaces the national currencies, the exclusive competence of the European Central Bank over euro-area monetary policy, and the absence of any provision for leaving the single currency supply maximal monetary depth. The Euro area supplies extent. The single settlement system, the banking union, and the stability mechanism supply interconnection. The combination is a high-density monetary attractor. The binding residue is monetary, while the fiscal rules are a low-depth layer whose repeated breach does not dissolve the monetary union, so the attractor does not rest on the fiscal component. Reversal-resistance is tested within case against the sovereign-debt crisis, the prospect of a member's exit, and the national-court challenges to the crisis instruments, all of which the monetary union absorbed, and the supranational criterion discriminates against a voluntary monetary-coordination contrast that retained reversal-flexibility. The same residue density that makes the Euro reversal-resistant attenuates the capacity of a national electorate to reverse its monetary conditions through a vote, so the constraint on monetary sovereignty is read as the accountability-face of reversal-resistance. The reading is structural and is offered alongside the existing debate, not as a verdict within it.
Files
The_Euro_as_Monetary_Cascade_Attractor_Preprint_Final.pdf
Files
(246.3 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:cba304d3ab365990ae26ff76bb1cc486
|
246.3 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Baldwin, R., & Giavazzi, F. (Eds.). (2015). The eurozone crisis: A consensus view of the causes and a few possible solutions. CEPR Press.
- Cecchetti, S. G., McCauley, R. N., & McGuire, P. M. (2012). Interpreting TARGET2 balances (BIS Working Papers No. 393). Bank for International Settlements.
- Cohen, B. J. (2011). The future of global currency: The euro versus the dollar. Routledge.
- Committee for the Study of Economic and Monetary Union. (1989). Report on economic and monetary union in the European Community. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
- Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Article 125 and Articles 127-133, and Protocol (No 4) on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank.
- De Grauwe, P. (2012). The governance of a fragile eurozone. Australian Economic Review, 45(3), 255-268.
- Eichengreen, B. (2010). The breakup of the euro area. In A. Alesina & F. Giavazzi (Eds.), Europe and the euro (pp. 11-51). University of Chicago Press.
- Gauweiler and Others, Case C-62/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:400 (Court of Justice of the European Union, June 16, 2015).
- German Federal Constitutional Court, PSPP judgment, 2 BvR 859/15, BVerfGE 154, 17 (May 5, 2020).
- Juncker, J.-C., Tusk, D., Dijsselbloem, J., Draghi, M., & Schulz, M. (2015). Completing Europe's Economic and Monetary Union [Five Presidents' Report]. European Commission.
- Kenen, P. B. (1969). The theory of optimum currency areas: An eclectic view. In R. A. Mundell & A. K. Swoboda (Eds.), Monetary problems of the international economy (pp. 41-60). University of Chicago Press.
- Kydland, F. E., & Prescott, E. C. (1977). Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy, 85(3), 473-491.
- McKinnon, R. I. (1963). Optimum currency areas. American Economic Review, 53(4), 717-725.
- Mehrhoff, P. (2026). Global cascade attractors: Power endogeneity, the public-private supranational spectrum, and cross-jurisdictional cascade dynamics. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20748830
- Mehrhoff, P. (2026). Integrated Action-Driver Theory (IADT): A general theory of human decision-making under complexity. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19085221
- Mehrhoff, P. (2026). Power endogeneity and cross-jurisdictional cascade dynamics: A foundational extension of the Unified Cascade Theory (UCT). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20732206
- Mehrhoff, P. (2026). The European Union as a legislative cascade attractor: Cross-jurisdictional residue, reversal-resistance, and the accountability spectrum. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20761129
- Mehrhoff, P. (2026). The structural supranational criterion: Extending the Unified Cascade Theory (UCT) beyond the legal taxonomy. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20733777
- Mehrhoff, P. (2026). Unified Cascade Theory (UCT): A macro-level framework for understanding how individual decisions produce institutional and systemic outcomes. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19178313
- Moravcsik, A. (1998). The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Cornell University Press.
- Mundell, R. A. (1961). A theory of optimum currency areas. American Economic Review, 51(4), 657-665.
- Obstfeld, M., Shambaugh, J. C., & Taylor, A. M. (2005). The trilemma in history: Tradeoffs among exchange rates, monetary policies, and capital mobility. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(3), 423-438.
- Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251-267.
- Pringle v Government of Ireland, Case C-370/12, ECLI:EU:C:2012:756 (Court of Justice of the European Union, November 27, 2012).
- Rogoff, K. (1985). The optimal degree of commitment to an intermediate monetary target. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100(4), 1169-1189.
- Scharpf, F. W. (2011). Monetary union, fiscal crisis and the preemption of democracy (MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/11). Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
- Sinn, H.-W., & Wollmershäuser, T. (2012). Target loans, current account balances and capital flows: The ECB's rescue facility. International Tax and Public Finance, 19(4), 468-508.
- Swiss National Bank. (2015, January 15). Swiss National Bank discontinues minimum exchange rate and lowers interest rate to –0.75% [Press release].
- Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union (2012).
- Weiss and Others, Case C-493/17, ECLI:EU:C:2018:1000 (Court of Justice of the European Union, December 11, 2018).
- Whelan, K. (2014). TARGET2 and central bank balance sheets. Economic Policy, 29(77), 79–137.
- Willis, H. P. (1901). A history of the Latin Monetary Union: A study of international monetary action. University of Chicago Press.