Published June 16, 2026 | Version v1

HMSPC: A Hybrid Mechanistic-Stochastic Physical-Continuous Model for Battery Dynamics

Description

Battery voltage dynamics are irregularly sampled, noise-corrupted, and strongly regime-dependent, properties that challenge standard sequential models. I propose HMSPC (Hybrid Mechanistic-Stochastic Physical-Continuous Model), a continuous-time latent variable model that addresses these challenges through two key components: a gated input-conditioned latent ODE that explicitly incorporates exogenous observations (current and temperature) into continuous-time state evolution, and a heteroscedastic observation model with uncertainty regularization that produces calibrated predictive variance. Built on the Latent ODE (Rubanova et al., 2019) framework, HMSPC replaces purely autonomous latent dynamics with a learned gating mechanism that adaptively controls how strongly operating conditions influence trajectory evolution at each integration step. Evaluated on the MIT-Stanford dataset (Severson et al., 2019) against Latent ODE and Vanilla Neural ODE (Chen et al., 2018) baselines across 5 seeds, HMSPC achieves a mean RMSE of 32.37 ± 1.34 mV compared to 58.33 ± 4.19 mV for Latent ODE, yielding a 45% reduction, alongside well-calibrated uncertainty estimates (ECE 0.078). Ablation studies confirm that input-conditioned drift and heteroscedastic noise each contribute meaningfully to both accuracy and calibration.

Files

HMSPC.pdf

Files (1.1 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ec2f5c1be659ecbc5b09cdf31c6c4f5b
1.1 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Has part
Peer review: arXiv:1406.1078 (arXiv)
Is derived from
Peer review: arXiv:1907.03907 (arXiv)
Peer review: arXiv:1806.07366 (arXiv)

Software

Repository URL
https://github.com/richardbarlian/HMSPC
Programming language
Python
Development Status
Active

References

  • Rubanova, Y.; Chen, R.T.Q.; Duvenaud, D. Latent ODEs for Irregularly-Sampled Time Series. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2019.
  • Severson, K.A.; Attia, P.M.; Jin, N.; Perkins, N.; Jiang, B.; Yang, Z.; Chen, M.H.; Aykol, M.; Herring, P.K.; Fraggedakis, D.; et al. Data-driven prediction of battery cycle life before capacity degradation. Nature Energy, 4, 383-391, 2019.
  • Chen, R.T.Q.; Rubanova, Y.; Bettencourt, J.; Duvenaud, D. Neural Ordinary Differential Equations. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2018.
  • Cho, K.; van Merrienboer, B.; Gulcehre, C.; Bahdanau, D.; Bougares, F.; Schwenk, H.; Bengio, Y. Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 2014.
  • Glorot, X.; Bengio, Y. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), 2010.
  • Saxe, A.; McClelland, J.; Ganguli, S. Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networks. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2014.
  • Kingma, D.P.; Welling, M. Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2014.
  • Kingma, D.P.; Ba, J. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2015.
  • Guo, C.; Pleiss, G.; Sun, Y.; Weinberger, K.Q. On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2017.