Published June 16, 2026 | Version v1

Paracremonium laticis R. F. Xu, K. D. Hyde & Tibpromma 2026, sp. nov.

  • 1. Center for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization, College of Biology and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing 655099, China & Key Laboratory of Yunnan Provincial Department of Education of the Deep-Time Evolution on Biodiversity from the Origin of the Pearl River, Qujing Normal University, Qujing, Yunnan Province, 655011, China & School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand & Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand
  • 2. Center for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization, College of Biology and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing 655099, China & Key Laboratory of Yunnan Provincial Department of Education of the Deep-Time Evolution on Biodiversity from the Origin of the Pearl River, Qujing Normal University, Qujing, Yunnan Province, 655011, China
  • 3. Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand
  • 4. Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand & Department Microbial Drugs, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), Inhoffenstrasse 7, 38124, Braunschweig, Germany
  • 5. CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Laboratory of Botany, Phytochemistry and Mycology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Montpellier, France
  • 6. Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
  • 7. College of Agronomy and Biological Science, Yuxi Normal University, Yuxi, Yunnan 653100, China
  • 8. School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand & Microbial Products and Innovations Research Group, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand & Advanced Microbial Metabolites and Phytochemical Technology, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100 Thailand

Description

Paracremonium laticis R. F. Xu, K. D. Hyde & Tibpromma sp. nov.

Fig. 11

Etymology.

Refers to the isolated source “rubber latex.”

Holotype.

GMB-W 1264.

Description.

Associated with contaminated rubber latex. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Fruiting bodies observed on the PDA plate covered with a natural rubber disc. Mycelium 3–7 μm wide, hyaline, septate, granulate. Conidiophores borne on aerial mycelium, slightly tapering upward, micronematous, mononematous, erect, simple, straight or slightly flexuous, smooth-walled, thin-walled, hyaline, sometimes reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells formed singly or integrated within hyphae, mostly enteroblastic, phialidic, arising laterally or terminally from hyphae, hyaline, smooth-walled, cylindrical to subcylindrical, occasionally slightly swollen at the base, tapering towards the apex, producing conidia successively. Conidiogenous loci are inconspicuous, without conspicuous collarettes. Conidia 5–10 × 3–6 μm (x – = 7.2 × 4.5, n = 50), solitary, hyaline, ellipsoidal to ovoid, sometimes slightly oblong, straight, smooth-walled, aseptate, typically rounded at both ends, slightly broader at the center with granular or guttulate.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies on PDA at room temperature (20–25 ° C), covering the whole plate within one week (6 cm diameter Petri dish), white, circular, rough, raised, entire margin; reverse white. Sporulation occurred after prolonged incubation on PDA covered with natural rubber discs.

Material examined.

China, • Yunnan Province, Lincang City, contaminated rubber latex, 28 July 2022, Rui-Fang Xu, L-25 (GMB-W 1264), living culture GMBCC 2520.

Notes.

In this study, a multi-gene phylogenetic analysis based on the ITS, LSU, and TUB 2 gene regions revealed that strain GMBCC 2520 belongs to Paracremonium and forms an independent branch sister to P. binnewijzendii (Fig. 7). Pairwise nucleotide comparison of ITS, LSU, and TUB 2 showed that P. laticis (GMBCC 2520) differs from P. binnewijzendii (CBS 143277, ex-type) by 45 / 531 bp (8.47 %, 9 gaps), 15 / 774 bp (1.94 %, 0 gaps), and 33 / 338 bp (9.76 %, 9 gaps), respectively (Jeewon and Hyde 2016). Morphologically, this collection (GMB-W 1264) can be distinguished from P. binnewijzendii (CBS H-23246, holotype) by its shorter and mostly integrated conidiogenous cells, which are cylindrical to subcylindrical, occasionally swollen at the base, and lack conspicuous collarettes, whereas P. binnewijzendii (CBS H-23246, holotype) possesses erect, unbranched, slightly tapering phialides with a visible collarette. Moreover, P. laticis (GMB-W 1264) produces broader conidia (3–6 μm vs. (1.5 –) 2.5–3.5 (– 4.5) μm) that are ellipsoidal to ovoid, smooth-walled, and typically formed singly, while P. binnewijzendii forms narrower, ellipsoidal to fusoid conidia in slimy heads at the phialide apices (Crous et al. 2017). Therefore, strain GMBCC 2520 (P. laticis) is introduced as a new species based on molecular and morphological analyses. The species was isolated from deteriorated rubber latex collected from a container near a rubber tree in Yunnan Province, China, and was associated with detectable surface alterations and oxidative modification signals on natural rubber during laboratory incubation.

Notes

Published as part of Xu, Rui-Fang, Karunarathna, Samantha C., Hyde, Kevin D., Phukhamsakda, Chayanard, Rapior, Sylvie, Dai, Dong-Qin, Wang, Mei-Mei, Ali, Sajad, Yang, Jing-Ya, Kakumyan, Pattana & Tibpromma, Saowaluck, 2026, Screening and identification of fungal species associated with early-stage deterioration of natural rubber, pp. 119-156 in MycoKeys 134 on pages 119-156, DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.134.195079

Files

Files (4.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e0c6a3e4a505a6c98fa7f8ce428bbbec
4.0 kB Download

System files (21.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:f54fb7e3e58583a9519e2c29ceaab36d
21.3 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Collection code
GMBCC
Material sample ID
GMB-W 1264, GMBCC 2520
Event date
2022-07-28
Verbatim event date
2022-07-28
Scientific name authorship
R. F. Xu, K. D. Hyde & Tibpromma
Kingdom
Fungi
Phylum
Ascomycota
Order
Hypocreales
Family
Nectriaceae
Genus
Paracremonium
Species
laticis
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic status
sp. nov.
Type status
holotype
Taxonomic concept label
Paracremonium laticis Xu, Hyde & Tibpromma, 2026

References

  • Jeewon R, Hyde KD (2016) Establishing species boundaries and new taxa among fungi: recommendations to resolve taxonomic ambiguities. Mycosphere 7: 1669–1677. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/7/11/4
  • Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Burgess TI, Carnegie AJ, Hardy GESJ, Smith D, Summerell BA, Cano-Lira JF, Guarro J, Houbraken J, Lombard L, Martín MP, Sandoval-Denis M, Alexandrova AV, Barnes CW, Baseia IG, Bezerra JDP, Guarnaccia V, May TW, Hernández-Restrepo M, Stchigel AM, Miller AN, Ordoñez ME, Abreu VP, Accioly T, Agnello C, Colmán AA, Albuquerque CC, Alfredo DS, Alvarado P, Araújo-Magalhães GR, Arauzo S, Atkinson T, Barili A, Barreto RW, Bezerra JL, Cabral TS, Rodríguez FC, Cruz R, Daniëls PP, Silva B da, Almeida D de, Júnior AC de, Decock CA, Delgat L, Denman S, Dimitrov RA, Edwards J, Fedosova AG, Ferreira RJ, Firmino AL, Flores JA, García D, Gené J, Giraldo A, Góis JS, Gomes AAM, Gonçalves CM, Gouliamova DE, Groenewald M, Guéorguiev BV, Guevara-Suarez M, Gusmão LFP, Hosaka K, Hubka V, Huhndorf SM, Jadan M, Jurjević Ž, Kraak B, Kučera V, Kumar TKA, Kušan I, Lacerda SR, Lamlertthon S, Lisboa WS, Loizides M, Luangsa-ard JJ, Lysková P, Cormack WM, Macedo DM, Machado AR, Malysheva EF, Marinho P, Matočec N, Meijer M, Mešić A, Mongkolsamrit S, Moreira KA, Morozova OV, Nair KU, Nakamura N, Noisripoom W, Olariaga I, Oliveira RJV, Paiva LM, Pawar P, Pereira OL, Peterson SW, Prieto M, Rodríguez-Andrade E (2017) Fungal Planet description sheets: 625–715. Persoonia 39: 270–467. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2017.39.11