Published June 11, 2026 | Version v1

Comparison of TALYS and EMPIRE results for 177Lu production yield assessment using Deuteron Particles from compact cyclotron

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen|School of Paramedical, Gerash University of Medical Sciences, Gerash, Iran

Description

Background. The radioisotope lutetium-177 (177Lu) has been suggested for utilizing in radio-immunotherapy. Now, 177Lu is mainly produced by neutron activation through nuclear reactors, although cyclotron-based radioisotope generation may also be assessed.

Methods. In this investigation, the small cyclotron located in Karaj, Iran, with a maximum deuteron energy of 14 MeV, was simulated to generate 177Lu using a 176Yb target with the TALYS and EMPIRE codes. Here, the generation yield of the 176Yb(d,p)177Yb→177Lu reaction was computed via different incident energies.

Results. The estimated cross-section amounts of the reaction (d,p) and its rival reaction (d,x) were compared with other reports. The maximum cross-section amount for the (d,p) interaction was evaluated to be 125 mb at 10.5 MeV and for the (d,x) interaction to be 121 mb at 9.5 MeV. Through Pade fitting, the computed production yields were 315 and 319 MBq/µA.h at 14 MeV deuteron energy from TALYS and EMIRE simulators, respectively.

Conclusion. For a one-hour irradiation at 100 μA beam current, the activity was approximately estimated 31.5 GBq of 177Lu at 14 MeV. The EMPIRE code's Fermi Gas Model offers computational efficiency and predictive capability for unknown nuclei, though its limitations at low excitation energies and for deformed nuclei introduce systematic uncertainties. Further experimental validation of the calculated cross-sections and development of efficient targetry and separation chemistry are recommended for practical implementation of this cyclotron-based production route.

Files

NUCET_article_170769.pdf

Files (1.1 MB)

Name Size
md5:6a25c7d52232488e6231c8e01107814b
1.1 MB Preview Download
md5:892a90e0f64f5c0d91f0a1f2d0526404
73.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • An H, Cai C (2006) Global deuteron optical model potential for the energy range up to 183 MeV. Physical Review C 73: 054605. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.73.054605
  • Chakraborty S, Vimalnath KV, Lohar SP, Shetty P, Dash A (2014) On the practical aspects of large-scale production of 177Lu for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using direct neutron activation of 176Lu in a medium flux research reactor: The Indian experience. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 302: 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3169-z
  • Dash A, Pillai MR, Knapp Jr FF (2015) Production of (177) Lu for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: Available Options. Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 49(2): 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-014-0315-z
  • Hanaoka H, Hashimoto K, Watanabe S, Matsumoto S, Sakashita T, Watanabe S, Ishioka NS, Endo K (2022) Comparative evaluation of radionuclide therapy using 90Y and 177Lu. Annals of Nuclear Medicine 37: 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-022-01803-y
  • Herman M, Capote R, Carlson B, Obložinský P, Sin M, Trkov A, Wienke H, Zerkin V (2007) EMPIRE: Nuclear reaction model code system for data evaluation. Nuclear Data Sheets 108(12): 2655–2715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2007.11.003
  • Hermanne A, Takacs S, Goldberg MB, Lavie E, Shubin YN, Kovalev S (2006) Deuteron-induced reactions on Yb: Measured cross sections and rationale for production pathways of carrier-free, medically relevant radionuclides, Nuclear Instruments and Methods B 247(2): 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2006.03.008
  • Khandaker MU, Haba H, Otuka N, Usman AR (2014) Investigation of (d,x) nuclear reactions on natural ytterbium up to 24 MeV. Nuclear Instruments and Methods B 335(15): 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2014.05.020
  • Khorshidi A (2016) Gold nanoparticles production using reactor and cyclotron based methods in assessment of 196,198Au production yields by 197Au neutron absorption for therapeutic purposes. Materials Science and Engineering: C 68: 449–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.018
  • Khorshidi A (2023) Nano Yttrium-90 and Rhenium-188 production through medium medical cyclotron and research reactor for therapeutic usages: A Simulation study. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 55(5): 1871–1877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.02.013
  • Manenti S, Groppi F, Gandini A, Gini L, Abbas K, Holzwarth U, Simonelli F, Bonardi MM (2011) Excitation function for deuteron induced nuclear reactions on natural ytterbium for production of high specific activity 177gLu in no-carrier-added form for metabolic radiotherapy. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 69(1): 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.08.008
  • Qaim SM (2017) Nuclear data for production and medical application of radionuclides: Present status and future needs. Nuclear Medicine and Biology 44: 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2016.08.016
  • Qaim SM, Tárkányi F, Capote R [eds] (2011) Nuclear Data for the Production of Therapeutic Radionuclides, Technical Reports Series No. 473. International Atomic Energy Agency, Division of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Vienna.
  • Shao L (2023) Optimization of Deuteron Irradiation of 176Yb for Producing 177Lu of High Specific Activity Exceeding 3000 GBq/mg. Molecules 28(16): 6053. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28166053
  • Tárkányi F, Ditrói F, Takács S, Hermanne A, Ignatyuk AV (2014) New data on activation cross section for deuteron induced reactions on ytterbium up to 50 MeV. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 336: 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2014.06.011
  • Tárkányi F, Ditrói F, Takács S, Hermanne A, Yamazaki H, Baba M, Mohammadi A, Ignatyuk AV (2013) Activation cross-sections of longer lived products of deuteron induced nuclear reactions on ytterbium up to 40 MeV. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 304: 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2013.03.056
  • Vogel WV, van der Marck SC, Versleijen MWJ (2021) Challenges and future options for the production of lutetium-177. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 48(8): 2329–2335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05392-2
  • Zhernosekov KP, Perego RC, Dvorakova Z, Henkelmann R, Türler A (2008) Target burn-up corrected specific activity of 177Lu produced via 176Lu(n, gamma) 177Lu nuclear reactions. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 66: 1218–1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.02.058
  • Ziegler JF (2013) SRIM-2013 software, The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter, Annapolis, MD, USA. http://www.srim.org/