Published June 12, 2026 | Version v1

Cuphodes Meyrick 1897

  • 1. Zoology Department, Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, Lungadige Porta Vittoria 9, 37129 Verona, Italy; caloptilia @ alice. it
  • 2. Forest Programme, NVT, Nature's Valley, South Africa; swartrudolph 90 @ gmail. com & Department of Conservation Management, Nelson Mandela University, George, South Africa
  • 3. Research and Exhibitions Department, South African Museum, Iziko Museums of South Africa, PO Box 61, Cape Town 8000, South Africa; svannoort @ iziko. org. za & Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Private Bag Rondebosch, 7701, Cape Town, South Africa
  • 4. INRAE, URZF, Orléans, France; carlos. lopezvaamonde @ inra. fr & IRBI, UMR 7261, CNRS-University of Tours, Tours, France & Natural History Museum Vienna, 2 nd Zoological Department, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria

Description

Genus

CuphodesMeyrick, 1897

Cuphodes Meyrick, 1897. Proc. Linnean Soc. New South Wales 22: 299 (key), 314. Type species: Cuphodes thysanota Meyrick, 1897, by monotypy.

Cyphosticha Meyrick, 1907. Proc. Linnean Soc. New South Wales 32: 49 (key), 61. Type species: Gracilaria (sic) pyrochroma Turner, 1894, by original designation.

Taxonomic history.

The genus was described by Meyrick in 1897 on the basis of a female, C. thysanota from Australia. It was compared with Stathmopoda Herrich-Schäffer, 1853, then included in the family Elachistidae, now included in the family Stathmopodidae (De Prins and De Prins 2011–2025). Meyrick probably confused Stathmopoda for the long and bristly scales on the mid and hindlegs and a similar peculiar posture of the adult. Subsequently Vári (1961) redescribed the genus, arguing that it should be included in the family Gracillariidae, near Cyphosticha Meyrick, 1907. For the description of the male characters, he used a species from India, Phrixosceles trochosticha Meyrick, 1908, the type genus of Phrixosceles Meyrick, 1908 which he considered as a synonym of Cuphodes (Fletcher 1929). For females he used both C. thysanota and P. trochosticha. This synonymy was proposed by Vári (1961) based on the similarity of the wing venation and the bristly hairs on the legs. De Prins et al. (2025), studying the Australian fauna, introduced new characters and considered Cyphosticha as a synonym of Cuphodes. They also moved all Australian species of Phrixosceles to the genus Cuphodes, but left the former genus valid with two species, P. trochosticha Meyrick, 1908 (type genus, India) and P. fibulatrix Meyrick, 1922 (Fiji) (De Prins et al. 2025).

Distribution and species richness.

The genus Cuphodes currently comprises 28 species distributed across Australia, Africa and southeastern Asia (De Prins et al. 2025). The nine species with known biology are leaf miners associated with Ebenaceae, Fabaceae, Putranjivaceae and Rhamnaceae. This total excludes Cuphodes paragrapta (Meyrick, 1915) from South America, which upon examination, does not appear to belong to Cuphodes but to an unknown genus. In addition to the described species, six putative species were reported by Kawakita et al. (2010), comprising leaf miners on Ebenaceae and Rhamnaceae from East Asia (Table 1), whose morphology has not yet been described.

DNA.

Cuphodes has frequently been included in molecular phylogenetic studies. Kawakita (2010) identified it as a putative sister taxon to Epicephala, concluding that it is probably one of the closest relatives of that genus. More recently, De Prins et al. (2025) found that mitochondrial data consistently support the monophyly of the Australian Cuphodes species, recovered as sister to Toowoomba De Prins, Sruoga & Zwick, 2025 + (Parectopa Clemens, 1860 + Polysoma Vári, 1961), albeit with low to moderate statistical support. In contrast, Cuphodes diospyrosella (Issiki, 1957) and C. wisteriella Kuroko, 1982, included in the analyses of Kawahara et al. (2016) and Li et al. (2022), were recovered as sister to all other Ornixolinae. In those studies, Parectopa was placed either very distantly (Kawahara et al. 2016) or was recovered as strongly polyphyletic (Li et al. 2022).

Australian Cuphodes.

The characters reported by De Prins et al. (2025) for Australian Cuphodes are a shining-white backround with a subtle yellow ochreous pattern on the forewing and exceptionally pilose hindlegs, equipped with erected sharply pointed spiniform scales. In male genitalia subscaphium + gnathos strongly developed; costa of valva very strongly sclerotised; subapical part of valva with a hanging semi-round flap or other sclerotisations of different sizes and shapes; transtilla complete but in case of absence the function of transtilla is taken by very long basal apodemes of valvae or sclerotised basal bow of vinculum. In female genitalia apophyses anteriores either absent or rather short; papillae anales strongly fused and deeply nested in the cuticle of segment VIII; antrum / colliculum sclerotised; signa small; bulla seminalis usually situated at anterior margin of segment VII or in segment VII, small with convoluted ductus seminalis.

South African Cuphodes.

Examination of African species treated by Vári (1961), specifically those with known males (C. melanostola (Meyrick, 1918), C. diospyri Vari, 1961, and C. dolichocera Vari, 1961), reveals important differences in the male genitalia compared with the characters reported by De Prins et al. (2025), particularly in the shape of the valva, which is simply rounded apically and lacks notable sclerotization. In the newly described C. spermotrophus sp. nov., two bristles are present at the apex of tegumen (Figs 1, 2). This feature is characteristic of several genera in other subfamilies of Gracillariidae, such as Spulerina (Acrocercopinae) and Spanioptila (Ornixolinae), and is particularly significant within Lithocolletinae. Among Australian Cuphodes, apical tegumen bristles are prominent in the pyrochroma clade, which includes C. pyrochroma (Turner, 1894), C. pandoxa (Turner, 1913), C. callimacha (Meyrick, 1920), but are apparently absent in the other groups. Notably, such bristles are not visible in the South African Cuphodes illustrated by Vári (1961) and are not mentioned in his descriptions. The wing venation does not differ from that of the type species C. thysanota Meyrick, 1897, in particular due to the absence of R 1 and R 2 in the forewing (Figs 4, 5).

Adults of the new South African species exhibit a typical resting posture for Cuphodes: the head is held downward, the abdomen raised and supported by the hindlegs, and the fore- and midlegs extended forward and held close together (Fig. 14) (Kawahara et al. 2016).

Based on these morphological and behavioural traits, we provisionally place spermotrophus sp. nov. in Cuphodes, following Vári’s interpretation, until further molecular or morphological data allow a more definitive placement.

Notes

Published as part of Triberti, Paolo, Swart, Rudi C., van Noort, Simon & Lopez-Vaamonde, Carlos, 2026, A new species of seed-feeding Cuphodes Meyrick, 1897 (Lepidoptera, Gracillariidae) from South Africa, pp. 117-135 in Nota Lepidopterologica 49 on pages 117-135, DOI: 10.3897/nl.49.189942

Files

Files (6.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:d9bfbe1248722fce380c9bb65a367657
6.8 kB Download

System files (38.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:052c7801341ced979d59e500df0edb6d
38.0 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Scientific name authorship
Meyrick
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Arthropoda
Order
Lepidoptera
Family
Gracillariidae
Genus
Cuphodes
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Cuphodes Meyrick, 1897 sec. Triberti, Swart, Noort & Lopez-Vaamonde, 2026

References

  • De Prins J, De Prins W (2011–2025) Afromoths, online database of Afrotropical moth species (Lepidoptera). World Wide Web electronic publication. https://www.afromoths.net [accessed 28. 03. 2025]
  • Vári L (1961) South African Lepidoptera. Vol. I. Lithocolletidae. Transvaal Museum Memoir 1961: 1–238.
  • Fletcher TB (1929) A list of the generic names used for Microlepidoptera. Memoirs of the Department of Agriculture in India. Entomological Series 11: 1–244.
  • De Prins J, Hartley D, Sruoga V, Nicholls J, Wallace J, Zwick A (2025) Diversity of Australian Ornixolinae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) with taxonomic and nomenclatural acts within the related taxa (Acrocercopinae and Gracillariinae) based on the evidence of museomics, bionomics, and mitogenomics. Zootaxa 5616 (1): 1–340. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5616.1.1
  • Kawakita A, Okamoto T, Goto R, Kato M (2010) Mutualism favours higher host specificity than does antagonism in plant-herbivore interaction. Proceedings of the Royal Society, series B Biological Sciences 277: 2765–2774. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0355
  • Kawakita A (2010) Evolution of obligate pollination mutualism in the tribe Phyllantheae (Phyllanthaceae). Plant Species Biology 25: 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.2009.00266.1
  • Kawahara AY, Plotkin D, Ohshima I, Lopez-Vaamonde C, Houlihan PR, Breinholt JW, Kawakita A, Xiao L, Regier JC, Davis DR, Kumata T, Sohn JC, De Prins J, Mitter C (2016) A molecular phylogeny and revised higher-level classification for the leaf-mining moth family Gracillariidae and its implications for larval host-use evolution. Systematic Entomology 42: 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12210
  • Li X, St Laurent R, Earl C, Doorenweerd C, van Nieukerken E, Davis DR, Johns CA, Kawakita A, Kobayashi S, Zwick A, Lopez-Vaamonde C, Ohshima I, Kawahara A (2022) Phylogeny of gracillariid leaf-mining moths: evolution of larval behaviour inferred from phylogenomic and Sanger data. Cladistics 38 (3): 277–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12490